Football / The bigger picture

Insights.

Go beyond the result. Follow the patterns. See the evidence.

How to read the signals →

Explore insights

Explore competitions →

Competition selects current clubs. Result windows include all recorded competitions; points comparisons use covered current-league matches.

League insights

UEFA Europa League · 5 signals · 1 clubs in this view

Explore all signals ↓

No supported compound story in this view yet. Individual signals remain available below.

Each signal belongs to one category. Categories sum to All signals; stories combine related evidence across categories.

All signals5 signals · 1 clubs

Select a row to explore the evidence. Scroll to see all columns →

Jagiellonia Both teams scored 83% Last 6 recorded matches · all competitions Scores56

Both teams have scored regularly in this recorded window. It describes past scorelines, rather than the probability for the next match.

Recorded scores · all competitions · Last 6 recorded matches · 2026-08-06 → 2026-10-15 UTC. UEFA Europa League 2026-2027: 1.43 goals per team/match, 36 matches · 2026-09-16 → 2026-10-15 UTC. Reference only: the club window spans all recorded competitions; no opponent adjustment.

Insight Score 56/100 Experimental · editorial interest
Deviation
50.0
Recency
87.6
Context
40.0
Quality
43.2

Uncalibrated selection heuristic. Not team strength, win probability or statistical significance. Sources keep their own windows; overlapping scorelines and forecast gaps receive reduced context credit.

Last 6 recorded matches · all competitions

Oldest → newest · scores from Jagiellonia’s perspective. Event: Both teams scored.

Date (UTC)OpponentGF–GAEvent
2026-08-06RangersH2–1WYes
2026-08-13RangersA1–1DYes
2026-08-20SaburtaloH4–0WNo
2026-08-27SaburtaloA2–1WYes
2026-09-16Olympiakos PiraeusA1–2LYes
2026-10-15Ararat-ArmeniaH3–1WYes
Full club analysis →
Jagiellonia Goals scored per match 2.2 Last 6 recorded matches · all competitions Scores47

This scoring average meets the descriptive signal threshold and includes games without a goal. Compare it with the league reference before treating it as exceptional; opposition is not adjusted.

Recorded scores · all competitions · Last 6 recorded matches · 2026-08-06 → 2026-10-15 UTC. UEFA Europa League 2026-2027: 1.43 goals per team/match, 36 matches · 2026-09-16 → 2026-10-15 UTC. Reference only: the club window spans all recorded competitions; no opponent adjustment.

Insight Score 47/100 Experimental · editorial interest
Deviation
23.6
Recency
87.6
Context
40.0
Quality
43.2

Uncalibrated selection heuristic. Not team strength, win probability or statistical significance. Sources keep their own windows; overlapping scorelines and forecast gaps receive reduced context credit.

Last 6 recorded matches · all competitions

Oldest → newest · scores from Jagiellonia’s perspective.

Date (UTC)OpponentGF–GA
2026-08-06RangersH2–1W
2026-08-13RangersA1–1D
2026-08-20SaburtaloH4–0W
2026-08-27SaburtaloA2–1W
2026-09-16Olympiakos PiraeusA1–2L
2026-10-15Ararat-ArmeniaH3–1W
Full club analysis →
Jagiellonia Goals conceded per match 1.0 Last 6 recorded matches · all competitions Scores43

This conceding average meets the low-goals signal threshold. Compare it with the league reference; opponent strength and chance quality are not adjusted.

Recorded scores · all competitions · Last 6 recorded matches · 2026-08-06 → 2026-10-15 UTC. UEFA Europa League 2026-2027: 1.43 goals per team/match, 36 matches · 2026-09-16 → 2026-10-15 UTC. Reference only: the club window spans all recorded competitions; no opponent adjustment.

Insight Score 43/100 Experimental · editorial interest
Deviation
13.8
Recency
87.6
Context
40.0
Quality
43.2

Uncalibrated selection heuristic. Not team strength, win probability or statistical significance. Sources keep their own windows; overlapping scorelines and forecast gaps receive reduced context credit.

Last 6 recorded matches · all competitions

Oldest → newest · scores from Jagiellonia’s perspective.

Date (UTC)OpponentGF–GA
2026-08-06RangersH2–1W
2026-08-13RangersA1–1D
2026-08-20SaburtaloH4–0W
2026-08-27SaburtaloA2–1W
2026-09-16Olympiakos PiraeusA1–2L
2026-10-15Ararat-ArmeniaH3–1W
Full club analysis →
Jagiellonia Scoring in a row 6 Last 6 recorded matches · all competitions Streak59

The club has scored in consecutive recorded matches, starting with the latest result. One goal is enough to extend the run.

Recorded scores · all competitions · Last 6 recorded matches · 2026-08-06 → 2026-10-15 UTC. A run of 10 is a lower bound. Related result sequences share one evidence family.

Insight Score 59/100 Experimental · editorial interest
Deviation
49.1
Recency
87.6
Context
40.0
Quality
60.0

Uncalibrated selection heuristic. Not team strength, win probability or statistical significance. Sources keep their own windows; overlapping scorelines and forecast gaps receive reduced context credit.

Last 6 recorded matches · all competitions

Oldest → newest · scores from Jagiellonia’s perspective. Event: Scoring in a row.

Date (UTC)OpponentGF–GAEvent
2026-08-06RangersH2–1WYes
2026-08-13RangersA1–1DYes
2026-08-20SaburtaloH4–0WYes
2026-08-27SaburtaloA2–1WYes
2026-09-16Olympiakos PiraeusA1–2LYes
2026-10-15Ararat-ArmeniaH3–1WYes

Consecutive known results, starting with the latest recorded match. Missing or special results are excluded. A 10+ streak is a lower bound within this window.

Full club analysis →
Jagiellonia xG difference per match −0.23 Underlying performance · 10-match window Observed xG21

Chances allowed exceed chances created in the observed playing-style profile. The two averages can have different xG coverage.

Observed match xG · available averages · 10-match profile · exact dates unavailable. Before next/latest league fixture, not necessarily current UTC. xG for 1.55; xG against 1.78. Coverage counts are unavailable and denominators can differ. Recency receives zero for this undated source; quality is capped at 40.

Insight Score 21/100 Experimental · editorial interest
Deviation
15.3
Recency
0.0
Context
40.0
Quality
40.0

Uncalibrated selection heuristic. Not team strength, win probability or statistical significance. Sources keep their own windows; overlapping scorelines and forecast gaps receive reduced context credit.

Underlying performance · 10-match window

xG for
1.55
xG against
1.78

Difference of observed averages; xG coverage can differ between the two metrics. Profile is before the next or latest league fixture, not necessarily current UTC.

Full club analysis →

Showing 1–5 of 5 signals

About these insights
A little context goes a long way

Read the signal. Keep the context.

Insights describe what is recorded. Use club and match analysis to explore what comes next.

Insight Score · experimental editorial interest. This version uses 0.35D + 0.25R + 0.20C + 0.20Q. D measures heuristic deviation, R observation recency, C breadth of evidence families and Q data quality. These starting weights are uncalibrated. It is neither team strength, win probability, statistical significance nor forecast confidence. Related result signals share one family; different sources are not automatically statistically independent. Unknown dates receive zero recency; unknown xG coverage limits its quality component. League averages are context references, not opponent-adjusted estimates.

01

Check the window

Result signals use the last 10 recorded matches; away signals use the last 8 away matches. At least 5 are required. Missing and special results are excluded. A 10+ streak is a lower bound.

02

Read the chart

Bars run oldest to newest. Height shows goals scored or conceded, capped at 6; zero keeps a marker. Teal / amber / red means win / draw / loss. Faded bars mean the event did not happen. Open the evidence for full scores.

03

Separate the sources

xG uses observed Playing style averages before the next or latest league fixture; coverage can differ between inputs. xPts comes from stored LOAD90 forecasts on identical covered games, including labelled historical reconstructions.

Types alternate for variety. Values are ordered within their own metric, without a combined ranking. These descriptive signals do not change the LOAD90 forecast.

Explore methodology →