Premier League Gameweek 22 Sat, Jan 17 2026 · 15:00 Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, London
1–2 Full time · HT 0–1 xG 1.68 – 2.69
  • C. Romero 64’
  • 15’ C. Summerville
  • 90’ C. Wilson
Full match report oneScoredOdds · Value · Detailed stats →
Match story · our forecast vs the result iModel is our forecast, published before the match and locked at kick-off: expected goals for each side and the probability of every outcome.

xG after the match measures the quality of the chances each side actually created. It is known only after the final whistle, so it is not a forecast.

Wilson’s late goal settles it for West Ham

Tottenham entered as favourites, but West Ham won 2–1 through goals from Summerville and Wilson. Tottenham replied through a Romero goal. West Ham finished with the higher xG (2.69 vs 1.68). On the chances created, Tottenham deserved more: 0.9 expected points against the 0 points they took.

Tottenham58%
Draw23%
West Ham ✓19%

Model vs reality

Tottenham goals
1
Model 1.94 · xG 1.68
West Ham goals
2
Model 1.04 · xG 2.69
Total goals
3
Model 2.98 · xG 4.37
Score 1–2
5%
Most likely 1–1 (11%)
Over 2.5
Yes
Model 57%
Both scored
Yes
Model 56%
Match facts
★ Player of the matchC. RomeroTottenham · 1 goal
8.3
  • RefereeJarred Gillett
  • VenueTottenham Hotspur Stadium
  • Table before kick-offTottenham 14th · West Ham 18th

Timeline

  1. V. CastellanosYellow card · Argument
    1’
  2. C. Summerville 0–1Assist Mateus Fernandes
    15’
  3. B. DaviesYellow card · Foul
    19’
  4. ⇄ D. SpenceFor B. Davies
    19’
  5. A. GrayYellow card · Foul
    39’
  6. C. RomeroYellow card · Foul
    45+1’
  7. Half time · 0–1
  8. ⇄ Y. BissoumaFor A. Gray
    46’
  9. J. BowenYellow card · Foul
    52’
  10. M. van de VenYellow card · Foul
    57’
  11. ⇄ D. SolankeFor M. Tel
    62’
  12. C. Romero 1–1Assist Pedro Porro
    64’
  13. T. SoučekYellow card · Foul
    72’
  14. D. SpenceYellow card · Foul
    78’
  15. ⇄ G. RodríguezFor Pablo
    79’
  16. ⇄ L. BergvallFor W. Odobert
    90’
  17. C. Wilson 1–2
    90’
  18. ⇄ C. WilsonFor V. Castellanos
    90+1’
  19. ⇄ M. KilmanFor Mateus Fernandes
    90+6’
  20. Full time · 1–2

Team stats

Tottenham21 shots · 15 in box, 6 outside
West Ham17 shots · 17 in box
TottenhamWest Ham
62% Possession 38%
1.68 Expected goals (xG) 2.69
0.87 Expected points (xPts) 1.95
21 Shots 17
6 Shots on target 4
11 Shots off target 6
4 Blocked shots 7
15 Shots inside the box 17
6 Shots outside the box 0
482 Passes 302
83% Pass accuracy 75%
11 Corners 5
2 Goalkeeper saves 5
12 Fouls 17
1 Offsides 1
5 Yellow cards 3
0 Red cards 0
6.83 Team rating 7.04

Line-ups

Tottenham 4-2-3-1

17.2 G. Vicario(G)
336.5 B. Davies ↓19’ 376.9 M. van de Ven 178.3★ C. Romero 237.3 Pedro Porro A
146.5 A. Gray ↓46’ 226.3 C. Gallagher
117.2 M. Tel ↓62’ 76.7 X. Simons 286.2 W. Odobert ↓90’
396.3 R. Kolo Muani
  • 1G. Vicario (G)7.2
  • 33B. Davies↓19’6.5
  • 37M. van de Ven6.9
  • 17C. Romero ★8.3
  • 23Pedro PorroA7.3
  • 14A. Gray↓46’6.5
  • 22C. Gallagher6.3
  • 11M. Tel↓62’7.2
  • 7X. Simons6.7
  • 28W. Odobert↓90’6.2
  • 39R. Kolo Muani6.3

Substitutes used

  • 19D. Solanke↑62’6.7
  • 8Y. Bissouma↑46’6.6
  • 24D. Spence↑19’6.3
  • 15L. Bergvall↑90’6.9

Unused: A. Kinský, R. Drăgușin, D. Scarlett, K. Danso, I. Udogie

West Ham 4-4-1-1

237.6 A. Areola(G)
306.7 O. Scarles 257.2 J. Todibo 157.3 K. Mavropanos 296.9 A. Wan-Bissaka
78.3 C. Summerville 187.3 Mateus Fernandes A↓90’ 286.9 T. Souček 206.9 J. Bowen
196.3 Pablo ↓79’
116.0 V. Castellanos ↓90’
  • 23A. Areola (G)7.6
  • 30O. Scarles6.7
  • 25J. Todibo7.2
  • 15K. Mavropanos7.3
  • 29A. Wan-Bissaka6.9
  • 7C. Summerville8.3
  • 18Mateus FernandesA↓90’7.3
  • 28T. Souček6.9
  • 20J. Bowen6.9
  • 19Pablo↓79’6.3
  • 11V. Castellanos↓90’6.0

Substitutes used

  • 9C. Wilson↑90’7.7
  • 24G. Rodríguez↑79’6.9
  • 3M. Kilman↑90’

Unused: M. Hermansen, K. Walker-Peters, Igor Julio, E. Mayers, F. Potts, M. Kanté

Player stats

Top rated
C. RomeroTottenham8.3
2nd
C. SummervilleWest Ham8.3
3rd
A. AreolaWest Ham7.6

Tottenham

West Ham

Match data from eScored. Ratings are the data provider's 0–10 match ratings; 7.2 and above is a strong game, 8+ is rare.