Bundesliga Gameweek 29 Sat, Apr 11 2026 · 14:30 Voith-Arena, Heidenheim an der Brenz
3–1 Full time · HT 2–0 xG 1.85 – 0.94
  • M. Honsak 9’, 36’
  • B. Zivzivadze 79’
  • 75’ L. Querfeld
Full match report oneScoredOdds · Value · Detailed stats →
Match story · our forecast vs the result iModel is our forecast, published before the match and locked at kick-off: expected goals for each side and the probability of every outcome.

xG after the match measures the quality of the chances each side actually created. It is known only after the final whistle, so it is not a forecast.

1. FC Heidenheim beat Union Berlin

1. FC Heidenheim won 3–1 through goals from Honsak and Zivzivadze. Union Berlin replied through a Querfeld goal. 1. FC Heidenheim finished with the higher xG (1.85 vs 0.94). On the chances created, Union Berlin deserved more: 0.8 expected points against the 0 points they took.

1. FC Heidenheim ✓38%
Draw27%
Union Berlin36%

Model vs reality

1. FC Heidenheim goals
3
Model 1.41 · xG 1.85
Union Berlin goals
1
Model 1.37 · xG 0.94
Total goals
4
Model 2.79 · xG 2.79
Score 3–1
4%
Most likely 1–1 (13%)
Over 2.5
Yes
Model 53%
Both scored
Yes
Model 57%
Match facts
★ Player of the matchB. Zivzivadze1. FC Heidenheim · 1 goal
8.5
  • RefereeChristian Dingert
  • CoachesF. Schmidt · —
  • VenueVoith-Arena
  • Table before kick-off1. FC Heidenheim 18th · Union Berlin 11th

Timeline

  1. M. Honsak 1–0Assist M. Pieringer
    9’
  2. O. BurkeYellow card · Roughing
    31’
  3. M. Honsak 2–0Assist P. Mainka
    36’
  4. Half time · 2–0
  5. ⇄ T. SkarkeFor O. Burke
    62’
  6. ⇄ T. RotheFor D. Köhn
    62’
  7. ⇄ Ilyas AnsahFor A. Schäfer
    70’
  8. ⇄ Livan BurcuFor Diogo Leite
    70’
  9. ⇄ B. ZivzivadzeFor S. Schimmer
    70’
  10. L. Querfeld 2–1Assist R. Khedira
    75’
  11. ⇄ A. IbrahimovićFor M. Honsak
    77’
  12. ⇄ N. DorschFor M. Pieringer
    78’
  13. B. Zivzivadze 3–1Assist J. Schöppner
    79’
  14. ⇄ L. KerberFor J. Schöppner
    88’
  15. ⇄ A. BeckFor E. Dinkçi
    88’
  16. VAR B. ZivzivadzeGoal Disallowed - offside
    90+4’
  17. Full time · 3–1

Team stats

1. FC Heidenheim7 shots · 6 in box, 1 outside
Union Berlin10 shots · 10 in box
1. FC HeidenheimUnion Berlin
45% Possession 55%
1.85 Expected goals (xG) 0.94
1.99 Expected points (xPts) 0.79
7 Shots 10
4 Shots on target 3
3 Shots off target 5
0 Blocked shots 2
6 Shots inside the box 10
1 Shots outside the box 0
315 Passes 394
71% Pass accuracy 70%
3 Corners 5
2 Goalkeeper saves 0
7 Fouls 13
1 Offsides 1
0 Yellow cards 1
0 Red cards 0
7.18 Team rating 6.28

Line-ups

1. FC Heidenheim 4-4-2

416.9 D. Ramaj(G)
266.9 Hennes Behrens 196.9 J. Föhrenbach 67.9 P. Mainka A 27.5 M. Busch
177.7 M. Honsak ↓77’ 37.0 J. Schöppner A↓88’ 166.6 J. Niehues 87.0 E. Dinkçi ↓88’
96.2 S. Schimmer ↓70’ 188.2 M. Pieringer A↓78’
  • 41D. Ramaj (G)6.9
  • 26Hennes Behrens6.9
  • 19J. Föhrenbach6.9
  • 6P. MainkaA7.9
  • 2M. Busch7.5
  • 17M. Honsak↓77’7.7
  • 3J. SchöppnerA↓88’7.0
  • 16J. Niehues6.6
  • 8E. Dinkçi↓88’7.0
  • 9S. Schimmer↓70’6.2
  • 18M. PieringerA↓78’8.2

Substitutes used

  • 30N. Dorsch↑78’6.6
  • 20L. Kerber↑88’
  • 21A. Beck↑88’
  • 22A. Ibrahimović↑77’6.9
  • 11B. Zivzivadze ★↑70’8.5

Unused: O. Traoré, F. Feller, T. Siersleben, C. Conteh

Coach: F. Schmidt

Union Berlin 3-1-4-2

16.7 F. Rønnow(G)
46.2 Diogo Leite ↓70’ 147.3 L. Querfeld 55.6 D. Doekhi
86.3 R. Khedira A
395.9 D. Köhn ↓62’ 136.0 A. Schäfer ↓70’ 336.7 A. Král 195.9 J. Haberer
235.9 A. Ilić 76.2 O. Burke ↓62’
  • 1F. Rønnow (G)6.7
  • 4Diogo Leite↓70’6.2
  • 14L. Querfeld7.3
  • 5D. Doekhi5.6
  • 8R. KhediraA6.3
  • 39D. Köhn↓62’5.9
  • 13A. Schäfer↓70’6.0
  • 33A. Král6.7
  • 19J. Haberer5.9
  • 23A. Ilić5.9
  • 7O. Burke↓62’6.2

Substitutes used

  • 10Ilyas Ansah↑70’6.3
  • 15T. Rothe↑62’6.2
  • 21T. Skarke↑62’6.6
  • 9Livan Burcu↑70’6.6

Unused: A. Kemlein, C. Klaus, J. Juranović, C. Trimmel

Player stats

Top rated
B. Zivzivadze1. FC Heidenheim8.5
2nd
M. Pieringer1. FC Heidenheim8.2
3rd
P. Mainka1. FC Heidenheim7.9

1. FC Heidenheim

Union Berlin

Match data from eScored. Ratings are the data provider's 0–10 match ratings; 7.2 and above is a strong game, 8+ is rare.