3rd · Belgian Pro League · 21 points · Matches played: 8
1 point behind Gent · Table & Fixtures →
WLWWW+8.1 is current form. We look at the goals the team scores and concedes and at the quality of its chances (expected goals, xG) over recent matches. If attack and defence are playing above what the Elo rating predicts, L90 Strength goes up for the forecast; if below, it goes down.
Base L90 Strength changed +5.2 over the last 5 matches; that is already inside the number. 37.8+8.1
Mid-table strength, top-table form.
Charleroi build on a top-third attack and back it with a top-third defence. Across the 8 league matches with forecasts, they have collected around 9 more points than our pre-match forecasts predicted. The squad is fully fit, and The toughest of the next 3 matches is the trip to KVC Westerlo.
They dominate the ball, with 57% possession, 3rd in the league. They allow very few chances (11 shots a game against). Their results hold up much the same at home and away.
- Top 4 55% · Relegation 0%Likely 4th · 60 projected points
-
Next 3: about 5 of 9 points Toughest at
KVC Westerlo · , 35% to win
- Full squadNobody reported missing
- 21 pts vs 12.4 expected+8.6 vs pre-match expectations · 8 matches with forecasts
Key insights
Automatic descriptive highlights for Charleroi. Each metric is ordered within its own type; types alternate to keep the selection varied. Up to six distinct signals for this club in each category.Result statistics require at least five known completed matches. They use the last ten recorded results across all competitions, or the last eight away results. Future, special and invalid results are excluded; missing results can interrupt real-world sequences, so streaks refer to recorded results. 10+ means at least ten within the window.
Bars run oldest to newest. Height shows goals scored, or goals conceded in conceding cards, on the same 0–6 scale. Six or more goals use maximum height; zero retains a small marker. Colour shows the result: teal = win, amber = draw, red = loss. In event and streak cards, solid bars mark the event and faded bars mark its absence. Hover for the date, full score and event. xG and points cards compare their two inputs, not a fabricated history.
xG Difference uses observed Playing style averages; window size is not xG coverage and the two metrics can have different denominators. Points minus xPts uses the same covered current-league matches and stored forecasts as Club strength, including labelled historical reconstructions.
Headlines
-
Insight
Charleroi
+1.13
xG difference per match
Underlying performance · 10-match window
xG for1.84xG against0.71
-
Insight
Charleroi
4
Clean sheets
Last 8 recorded matches · all competitions
Goals scored · W/D/L colours
Solid = Clean sheet -
Insight
Charleroi
+8.5
Points above expected
8/8 covered matches · current leagues
Points21.0xPts12.5
-
Streak
Charleroi
3
Wins in a row
Last 8 recorded matches · all competitions
Goals scored · W/D/L colours
Solid = Wins in a row -
Trend
Charleroi
2.0
Goals scored per match
Last 8 recorded matches · all competitions
Goals scored · W/D/L colours
-
Insight
Charleroi
0.9
Goals conceded per match
Last 8 recorded matches · all competitions
Goals conceded · W/D/L colours
Attack
-
Insight
Charleroi
+1.13
xG difference per match
Underlying performance · 10-match window
xG for1.84xG against0.71
-
Trend
Charleroi
2.0
Goals scored per match
Last 8 recorded matches · all competitions
Goals scored · W/D/L colours
-
Streak
Charleroi
8
Scoring in a row
Last 8 recorded matches · all competitions
Goals scored · W/D/L colours
Solid = Scoring in a row -
Insight
Charleroi
+8.5
Points above expected
8/8 covered matches · current leagues
Points21.0xPts12.5
Defence
Streaks
Season
League position and season results.
Overview
2026-2027Expected metrics · 4 of 8 matches covered
Expected metrics · 4 of 8 matches covered
Season totals cover all competitions and stages. Positions and points refer to each competition table.
League standings
Belgian Pro League · 2026-2027
Swipe to explore the league table →
| # | Club | Rating | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1▲ | 46 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | +11 | 22 | WWDWW | |
| 2▲ | 76 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | +15 | 21 | LWWWW | |
| 3▲ | 38 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | +9 | 21 | WLWWW | |
| 4▼ | 70 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | +18 | 20 | WWWWD | |
| 5– | 43 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | +3 | 16 | WDWWW | |
| 6▲ | 33 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | +3 | 13 | DWWWW | |
| 7▲ | 44 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | +4 | 12 | WDDLW | |
| 8▼ | 30 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | +1 | 11 | DWLLL | |
| 9▼ | 33 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | +0 | 11 | WWLLL | |
| 10▲ | 36 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | +0 | 11 | WLLDW | |
| 11▼ | 25 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -6 | 9 | LWWLL | |
| 12▼ | 35 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -1 | 8 | LWLLL | |
| 13– | 26 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -8 | 7 | LLLLL | |
| 14▲ | 23 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -8 | 6 | DLLDW | |
| 15– | 18 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -8 | 5 | LLDWD | |
| 16▼ | 17 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | -10 | 4 | DLWLL | |
| 17▼ | 21 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 5 | -7 | 3 | LLDLL | |
| 18– | 12 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | -16 | 3 | LLLWL |
18 clubs · ▲ Up · ▼ Down · – Unchanged · Since the start of the latest played matchweek.
League position over time
Position by matchweek
Higher is better. One point per matchweek; partial rounds are marked. Postponed games count when played. Hover, tap or focus a point for details.
View position history
| MW | Results through (UTC) | Position | Pts | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 Aug 2026 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| 2 | 16 Aug 2026 | 3 | 6 | 2 |
| 3 · Partial | 23 Aug 2026 | 2 | 9 | 3 |
| 4 · Partial | 30 Aug 2026 | 1 | 12 | 4 |
| 5 · Partial | 4 Sep 2026 | 1 | 12 | 4 |
| 6 · Partial | 6 Sep 2026 | 4 | 12 | 5 |
| 7 · Partial | 13 Sep 2026 | 4 | 15 | 6 |
| 8 | 20 Sep 2026 | 4 | 18 | 7 |
| 9 | 11 Oct 2026 | 3 | 21 | 8 |
Competition standings
There is no combined table across competitions. View each competition separately.
Squad 30 players · this season, all competitions
| Player | Age | Apps | Min | G | A | Rating | Model role |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goalkeepers | |||||||
| 24 | 7 (7) | 630 | 0 | 0 | 7.05 | starter | |
| — | 1 (1) | 90 | 0 | 0 | — | rotation | |
| — | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | |
| Defenders | |||||||
| 30 | 8 (8) | 716 | 2 | 2 | 7.41 | starter | |
| 26 | 8 (8) | 698 | 0 | 0 | 6.85 | starter | |
| 23 | 7 (7) | 630 | 2 | 0 | 7.38 | starter | |
| 26 | 7 (7) | 630 | 1 | 0 | 7.34 | starter | |
| 29 | 8 (8) | 540 | 1 | 3 | 7.09 | starter | |
| 22 | 6 (2) | 180 | 0 | 0 | 6.82 | rotation | |
| 20 | 2 (0) | 45 | 0 | 0 | 6.26 | rotation | |
| — | 2 (0) | 35 | 0 | 0 | 6.37 | rotation | |
| 23 | 2 (0) | 23 | 0 | 0 | 6.62 | depth | |
| — | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | |
| — | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | |
| Midfielders | |||||||
| 21 | 8 (8) | 697 | 0 | 0 | 6.92 | rotation | |
| 22 | 8 (7) | 642 | 1 | 3 | 7.42 | rotation | |
| 19 | 8 (8) | 559 | 1 | 0 | 6.89 | rotation | |
| — | 7 (0) | 154 | 0 | 1 | 6.58 | rotation | |
| 25 | 1 (1) | 74 | 1 | 0 | ★ 8.20 | — | |
| 21 | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | |
| — | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | |
| — | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | |
| — | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | |
| Forwards | |||||||
| 28 | 7 (7) | 558 | 3 | 1 | 6.92 | starter | |
| 23 | 8 (4) | 386 | 3 | 0 | 7.05 | starter | |
| 29 | 4 (4) | 314 | 0 | 0 | 6.75 | starter | |
| 22 | 7 (1) | 140 | 0 | 1 | 6.48 | rotation | |
| 25 | 5 (0) | 108 | 1 | 1 | 6.70 | rotation | |
| — | 4 (0) | 71 | 0 | 0 | 6.29 | rotation | |
| 21 | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | |
Stats are this season in all competitions. Model role is how much the availability model weighs each player before the trip to Antwerp: core, starter, rotation or depth, from several seasons of minutes and ratings.
Performance
Strength, recent form and playing style.
Strength Belgian Pro League · 18 clubs
In forecast League average
L90 Strength comes from Elo; Attack and Defence from goals scored and conceded, expected goals (xG) and shots on target, all on fixed 0–100 scales shared by every league. These are the numbers the forecast uses.
Form last 5 for the index · last 8 listed
- Points, last 5
- 12
- Median top-5 club
- 8.1
- Own forecasts
- 7.5 +4.5
Higher in the table than their strength suggests.
Form compares points with what a median top-five club (L90 Strength 50) would take from the same fixtures, so wins over strong sides count for more; 50 is a typical run. "Own forecasts" is the gap to this club's pre-match expectations. Form is context: in our tests it did not improve the forecast.
- W11 OctA · Standard Liege1–01.4 xPts
- W19 SepH · Cercle Brugge3–21.9 xPts
- W13 SepA · Zulte Waregem1–01.2 xPts
- L5 SepH · Union St. Gilloise2–31.2 xPts
- W29 AugA · Kortrijk3–11.8 xPts
- W22 AugH · KV Mechelen2–01.9 xPts
- W16 AugA · Lommel United1–01.2 xPts
- W9 AugH · OH Leuven3–11.8 xPts
Trends last 8, all competitions
Playing style vs Belgian Pro League average
Home and away this league season
Goal timing this league season · 8 games
scored conceded, per 15 minutes
Possession adjusts the LOAD90 forecast directly. Goals, xG and shots on target feed the Attack and Defence ratings. The rest describes how the team plays and does not change the forecast.
Team rankings Belgian Pro League · 8 games · rank of 18
Attack
Defence
Overall
Scorelines
- 1–0×3
- 3–1×2
- 2–0×1
- 2–3×1
- 3–2×1
Goals per game both teams
Totals club · league
- Over 1.5
- 63%79%
- Over 2.5
- 50%61%
- Over 3.5
- 50%35%
- Both scored
- 50%43%
- Clean sheet
- 50%31%
- Failed to score
- 0%31%
This league season only. xPts adds up our pre-match win and draw chances (pure EloLambda, the same numbers as Form). xG and TR come from match data and describe the season so far; none of these rankings change the forecast directly.