Bodo/Glimt

24th · UEFA Champions League · 3 points · Matches played: 2

3 points behind Paris Saint Germain · Table & Fixtures →

L90 Strength L90 Strength is LOAD90’s own club strength rating on a fixed 0–100 scale, built from its Elo rating. League Strength uses the mean Elo of a league's clubs and a separate league calibration, so the two scores are not directly comparable.

+2.7 is current form. We look at the goals the team scores and concedes and at the quality of its chances (expected goals, xG) over recent matches. If attack and defence are playing above what the Elo rating predicts, L90 Strength goes up for the forecast; if below, it goes down.
60.4+2.7
World Rank 55th Global, by Elo
UEFA Champions League Rank 27th L90 Strength

Compare clubs

Choose a second club to explore what separates them.

Our take

A solid mid-table side.

Bodo/Glimt rely on a mid-table defence, but their attack is among the league's weakest and costs them. O. Didrik Blomberg and H. Evjen are out, and The toughest of the next 2 matches is the trip to Napoli.

  • Relegation 1%Likely 20th · 11 projected points
  • Next 2: about 3 of 6 points Toughest at Napoli · , 28% to win
  • 2 key players outO. Didrik Blomberg, H. Evjen · 13% of squad weight missing

Key insights

Automatic descriptive highlights for Bodo/Glimt. Each metric is ordered within its own type; types alternate to keep the selection varied. Up to six distinct signals for this club in each category.

Result statistics require at least five known completed matches. They use the last ten recorded results across all competitions, or the last eight away results. Future, special and invalid results are excluded; missing results can interrupt real-world sequences, so streaks refer to recorded results. 10+ means at least ten within the window.

Bars run oldest to newest. Height shows goals scored, or goals conceded in conceding cards, on the same 0–6 scale. Six or more goals use maximum height; zero retains a small marker. Colour shows the result: teal = win, amber = draw, red = loss. In event and streak cards, solid bars mark the event and faded bars mark its absence. Hover for the date, full score and event. xG and points cards compare their two inputs, not a fabricated history.

xG Difference uses observed Playing style averages; window size is not xG coverage and the two metrics can have different denominators. Points minus xPts uses the same covered current-league matches and stored forecasts as Club strength, including labelled historical reconstructions.

Headlines insights

All qualifying highlights · metric types alternate, not a combined ranking

Attack insights

All qualifying highlights · metric types alternate, not a combined ranking

Defence insights

All qualifying highlights · metric types alternate, not a combined ranking

Streaks

Not enough recorded data for this category yet.

The full picture, with the evidence behind every signal.View all Club insights →

Season

League position and season results.

Overview

2026-2027
All competitions2 Played
50.0%Win %
Wins1
Draws0
Losses1

Expected metrics · 1 of 2 matches covered

Goals For
10.50 / game
xG 1.20 0.20 fewer goals than expected. vs 1 goals
Goals Against
52.50 / game
xGA 0.78 0.78 fewer conceded than expected. vs 0 conceded
Goal Difference
-4-2.00 / game
xGD +0.42 Goal difference is 0.58 higher than expected. vs +1 GD
Clean Sheets
150% of games

Season totals cover all competitions and stages. Positions and points refer to each competition table.

Competition standings

There is no combined table across competitions. View each competition separately.

Squad 29 players · this season, all competitions · 5 out

Most minutes
M. L. Andersen0 min
Key to the model
N. HaikinCore · weight 3.00

Stats are this season in all competitions. Model role is how much the availability model weighs each player before the trip to Napoli: core, starter, rotation or depth, from several seasons of minutes and ratings.

Performance

Strength, recent form and playing style.

Strength UEFA Champions League · 36 clubs

L90 Strength27th of 36
60 Elo 1709 · World #55
Current Strength
58 With absences before 20 Oct: -13 Elo
Attack25th of 36
61 Scores 1.72 per match against an average top-five side
Defence19th of 36
64 Concedes 1.34 per match against an average top-five side

In forecast League average

L90 Strength comes from Elo; Attack and Defence from goals scored and conceded, expected goals (xG) and shots on target, all on fixed 0–100 scales shared by every league. These are the numbers the forecast uses.

Strong at both ends Defence first Attack first Struggling Attack → Defence → Paris Saint Germain: attack 91, defence 83, L90 Strength 90 Aston Villa: attack 83, defence 78, L90 Strength 84 Barcelona: attack 97, defence 92, L90 Strength 93 VfB Stuttgart: attack 70, defence 58, L90 Strength 68 Liverpool: attack 85, defence 84, L90 Strength 84 Sporting CP: attack 75, defence 81, L90 Strength 84 Arsenal: attack 86, defence 95, L90 Strength 94 Real Betis: attack 79, defence 59, L90 Strength 72 Real Madrid: attack 89, defence 85, L90 Strength 89 Bayern München: attack 96, defence 90, L90 Strength 94 Shakhtar Donetsk: attack 54, defence 62, L90 Strength 58 Como: attack 72, defence 67, L90 Strength 67 Manchester United: attack 72, defence 80, L90 Strength 79 Villarreal: attack 76, defence 73, L90 Strength 67 Atletico Madrid: attack 82, defence 87, L90 Strength 81 Club Brugge KV: attack 86, defence 58, L90 Strength 76 Manchester City: attack 92, defence 82, L90 Strength 91 Borussia Dortmund: attack 69, defence 80, L90 Strength 81 Lens: attack 63, defence 53, L90 Strength 58 AEK Athens FC: attack 50, defence 57, L90 Strength 53 RB Leipzig: attack 76, defence 53, L90 Strength 68 Sabah FA: attack 30, defence 27, L90 Strength 26 Feyenoord: attack 76, defence 61, L90 Strength 61 Bodo/Glimt: attack 61, defence 64, L90 Strength 60 AS Roma: attack 72, defence 75, L90 Strength 74 PSV Eindhoven: attack 60, defence 64, L90 Strength 74 Viking: attack 18, defence 23, L90 Strength 16 Fenerbahce: attack 75, defence 53, L90 Strength 64 Inter: attack 91, defence 73, L90 Strength 84 FC Porto: attack 74, defence 79, L90 Strength 80 Slavia Praha: attack 41, defence 40, L90 Strength 40 Napoli: attack 61, defence 70, L90 Strength 63 Lask Linz: attack 48, defence 34, L90 Strength 39 Lille: attack 42, defence 60, L90 Strength 56 Galatasaray: attack 57, defence 55, L90 Strength 64 Slovan Bratislava: attack 18, defence 22, L90 Strength 20
Every UEFA Champions League club on the Attack and Defence scales. Dashed lines are the league average. Tap a crest to open that club.

Form last 2 for the index · last 2 listed

65
Form index
Points, last 2
3
Median top-5 club
1.2
Own forecasts
1.5 +1.5
Table24th L90 Strength27th Form—

Too early in the season to compare table and strength.

Form compares points with what a median top-five club (L90 Strength 50) would take from the same fixtures, so wins over strong sides count for more; 50 is a typical run. "Own forecasts" is the gap to this club's pre-match expectations. Form is context: in our tests it did not improve the forecast.

  • W14 OctH · Borussia Dortmund1–01.2 xPts
  • L10 SepA · Bayern München0–50.4 xPts

Trends last 2, all competitions

Scored 1/2
Clean sheet 1/2
Conceded 2+ 1/2
Over 2.5 1/2
Both teams scored 0/2

Playing style vs UEFA Champions League average

BODLeagueRank
Goals scored 0.50 2.04 32nd
Goals conceded 2.50 2.04 24th
xG — 1.65 —
xG allowed — 1.78 —
Scored in 50% 82% 24th
Clean sheets 50% 18% 2nd
BODLeagueRank
Shots 7.00 14.46 35th
Shots on target — 5.83 —
On target share 21% 37% 34th
Box share 65% 64% 16th
Conversion 7% 14% 28th
BODLeagueRank
Shots allowed 17.00 14.46 24th
On target allowed 8.00 5.77 27th
Blocks 5.00 3.99 10th
Save rate 63% 64% 18th
BODLeagueRank
Possession 41% 50% 29th
Passes 453 469 19th
Pass accuracy 83% 86% 29th
BODLeagueRank
Fouls 7.50 11.49 2nd
Fouls suffered 6.50 11.49 35th
Yellow cards 0.50 1.82 1st
Red cards 0.50 0.06 33rd
This league season, per match · 2 games. Rank among 36 clubs; for conceded, allowed, fouls and cards the lowest ranks 1st.
BODLeagueRank
Goals scored 2.10 2.13 16th
Goals conceded 1.80 1.34 30th
xG 1.42 1.96 30th
xG allowed 1.62 1.31 29th
Scored in 80% 86% 21st
Clean sheets 30% 31% 15th
BODLeagueRank
Shots 10.60 16.15 35th
Shots on target 5.22 6.07 29th
On target share 44% 37% 2nd
Box share 73% 66% 2nd
Conversion 20% 13% 2nd
BODLeagueRank
Shots allowed 18.70 12.86 36th
On target allowed 6.30 4.54 33rd
Blocks 5.88 3.54 1st
Save rate 68% 69% 24th
BODLeagueRank
Possession 47% 54% 31st
Passes 504 503 19th
Pass accuracy 84% 86% 31st
BODLeagueRank
Fouls 10.44 10.94 13th
Fouls suffered 9.22 11.47 33rd
Yellow cards 1.40 1.66 8th
Red cards 0.10 0.05 23rd
Last 10 matches, all competitions, per match · 10 games. Rank among 36 clubs; for conceded, allowed, fouls and cards the lowest ranks 1st.

Home and away this league season

Home3.00pts per game1-0-0 · 1.0–0.0 goals · 1 games
Away0.00pts per game0-0-1 · 0.0–5.0 goals · 1 games

Goal timing this league season · 2 games

0-15
16-30
31-45
1 1 46-60
1 61-75
3 76-90

scored conceded, per 15 minutes

In forecastVia Att/DefContextLeague average

Possession adjusts the LOAD90 forecast directly. Goals, xG and shots on target feed the Attack and Defence ratings. The rest describes how the team plays and does not change the forecast.

Team rankings UEFA Champions League · 2 games · rank of 36

Attack

GF 1 32nd / 36
GF/G 0.50 32nd / 36
xG/G — —
G − xG — —

Defence

GA 5 24th / 36
GA/G 2.50 24th / 36
xGA/G — —
xGA − GA — —

Overall

Pts 3 12th / 36
xPts 1.5 33rd / 36
PPG 1.50 12th / 36
TR 6.54 27th / 36
GD -4 31st / 36
xGD — —
W 1 10th / 36
L 1 12th / 36

Scorelines

  • 0–5×1
  • 1–0×1

Goals per game both teams

0% 0
50% 1
0% 2
0% 3
0% 4
50% 5+

Totals club · league

Over 1.5
50%89%
Over 2.5
50%72%
Over 3.5
50%61%
Both scored
0%64%
Clean sheet
50%18%
Failed to score
50%18%
ClubLeague average

This league season only. xPts adds up our pre-match win and draw chances (pure EloLambda, the same numbers as Form). xG and TR come from match data and describe the season so far; none of these rankings change the forecast directly.