Sabah FA

22nd · UEFA Champions League · 3 points · Matches played: 2

3 points behind Paris Saint Germain · Table & Fixtures →

L90 Strength L90 Strength is LOAD90’s own club strength rating on a fixed 0–100 scale, built from its Elo rating. League Strength uses the mean Elo of a league's clubs and a separate league calibration, so the two scores are not directly comparable.

+1.4 is current form. We look at the goals the team scores and concedes and at the quality of its chances (expected goals, xG) over recent matches. If attack and defence are playing above what the Elo rating predicts, L90 Strength goes up for the forecast; if below, it goes down. 26.3+1.4
World Rank 272nd Global, by Elo
UEFA Champions League Rank 34th L90 Strength
Last Slavia PrahaH xG 1.2–1.7 2–0 Next Borussia DortmundH 17%

Compare clubs

Choose a second club to explore what separates them.
Our take

Short on strength, fighting for points.

Sabah FA are short of quality at both ends, with one of the weaker attack in the league and one of the weaker defence in the league. The squad is fully fit, and The toughest of the next 2 matches is the visit of Borussia Dortmund.

  • Relegation 20%Likely 31st · 7 projected points
  • Next 2: about 2 of 6 points Toughest vs Borussia Dortmund · , 17% to win
  • Full squadNobody reported missing

Key insights

Automatic descriptive highlights for Sabah FA. Each metric is ordered within its own type; types alternate to keep the selection varied. Up to six distinct signals for this club in each category.

Result statistics require at least five known completed matches. They use the last ten recorded results across all competitions, or the last eight away results. Future, special and invalid results are excluded; missing results can interrupt real-world sequences, so streaks refer to recorded results. 10+ means at least ten within the window.

Bars run oldest to newest. Height shows goals scored, or goals conceded in conceding cards, on the same 0–6 scale. Six or more goals use maximum height; zero retains a small marker. Colour shows the result: teal = win, amber = draw, red = loss. In event and streak cards, solid bars mark the event and faded bars mark its absence. Hover for the date, full score and event. xG and points cards compare their two inputs, not a fabricated history.

xG Difference uses observed Playing style averages; window size is not xG coverage and the two metrics can have different denominators. Points minus xPts uses the same covered current-league matches and stored forecasts as Club strength, including labelled historical reconstructions.

Headlines

Headlines insights

All qualifying highlights · metric types alternate, not a combined ranking

Attack

Attack insights

All qualifying highlights · metric types alternate, not a combined ranking

Defence

Defence insights

All qualifying highlights · metric types alternate, not a combined ranking

Streaks

Not enough recorded data for this category yet.

The full picture, with the evidence behind every signal.View all Club insights →

Season

League position and season results.

Overview

2026-2027
UEFA Champions League · League phaseView table →
Position
22nd/ 36
Points
31.50 PPG
Played
2
League gap
3pts behind leader
50.0%Win %
Wins1
Draws0
Losses1

Expected metrics · 1 of 2 matches covered

Goals For
21.00 / game
xG 1.24 0.76 more goals than expected. vs 2 goals
Goals Against
42.00 / game
xGA 1.74 1.74 fewer conceded than expected. vs 0 conceded
Goal Difference
-2-1.00 / game
xGD -0.50 Goal difference is 2.50 higher than expected. vs +2 GD
Clean Sheets
150% of games

League phase standings

UEFA Champions League · 2026-2027

Full standings →

Swipe to explore the league table →

Full UEFA Champions League table, Sabah FA highlighted
#ClubRatingPWDLGDPtsForm
1– Paris Saint Germain 90 2200 +7 6
2▲ Aston Villa 84 2200 +7 6
3– Barcelona 93 2200 +7 6
4▲ VfB Stuttgart 68 2200 +5 6
5▲ Liverpool 84 2200 +4 6
6– Sporting CP 84 2200 +4 6
7▲ Arsenal 94 2200 +4 6
8▲ Real Betis 72 2200 +2 6
9▲ Real Madrid 89 2200 +2 6
10▼ Bayern München 94 2110 +5 4
11▲ Shakhtar Donetsk 58 2110 +2 4
12▼ Como 67 2101 +2 3
13▼ Manchester United 79 2101 +2 3
14▲ Villarreal 67 2101 +1 3
15▲ Atletico Madrid 81 2101 +1 3
16▲ Club Brugge KV 76 2101 +0 3
17▼ Manchester City 91 2101 +0 3
18▼ Borussia Dortmund 81 2101 +0 3
19▼ Lens 58 2101 -1 3
20▼ AEK Athens FC 53 2101 -1 3
21▲ RB Leipzig 68 2101 -2 3
22▲ Sabah FA 26 2101 -2 3
23▲ Feyenoord 61 2101 -3 3
24▲ Bodo/Glimt 60 2101 -4 3
25▼ AS Roma 74 2011 -1 1
26▼ PSV Eindhoven 74 2011 -1 1
27▲ Viking 16 2011 -2 1
28▼ Fenerbahce 64 2011 -6 1
29▼ Inter 84 2002 -2 0
30▲ FC Porto 80 2002 -3 0
31▼ Slavia Praha 40 2002 -3 0
32▼ Napoli 63 2002 -3 0
33▼ Lask Linz 39 2002 -4 0
34▼ Lille 56 2002 -4 0
35▼ Galatasaray 64 2002 -5 0
36▼ Slovan Bratislava 20 2002 -8 0

36 clubs · ▲ Up · ▼ Down · – Unchanged · Since the start of the latest played matchday.

League position over time

Position by matchday

Higher is better. One point per matchday; partial rounds are marked. Postponed games count when played. Hover, tap or focus a point for details.

View position history
Sabah FA league position by matchweek
MDResults through (UTC)PositionPtsP
110 Sep 20263401
214 Oct 20262232

Squad 29 players · this season, all competitions · 1 out

Absences reported for the last match: 13 Oct 2026

Most minutes
R. Əyyubov0 min
Key to the model
S. PokatilovStarter · weight 2.00
PlayerAgeAppsMinGARatingModel role
Goalkeepers
R. Əyyubov 17 0 (0) 0 0 0 — —
R. Mirzəmmədov 21 0 (0) 0 0 0 — —
S. Pokatilov 33 0 (0) 0 0 0 — starter
A. Ramazanov 23 0 (0) 0 0 0 — —
Defenders
G. Boakye — 0 (0) 0 0 0 — —
J. Bulus — 0 (0) 0 0 0 — —
R. Daşdəmirov 27 0 (0) 0 0 0 — starter
Erivaldo Almeida 26 0 (0) 0 0 0 — rotation
A. McCarthy — 0 (0) 0 0 0 — rotation
T. Mutallimov — 0 (0) 0 0 0 — depth
T. Puchacz 27 0 (0) 0 0 0 — starter
S. Solvet 30 0 (0) 0 0 0 — starter
A. Zedadka 31 0 (0) 0 0 0 — starter
Z. Ould Khaled 26 0 (0) 0 0 0 — —
Midfielders
Rodrigo Fernandes 25 0 (0) 0 0 0 — depth
A. Isaev 30 0 (0) 0 0 0 — starter
A. Xaybulayev 25 0 (0) 0 0 0 — depth
I. Lepinjica 27 0 (0) 0 0 0 — starter
Cafar Mukhtarov — 0 (0) 0 0 0 — —
U. Rahmonaliyev 23 0 (0) 0 0 0 — starter
R. Rüstəmli 23 0 (0) 0 0 0 — —
X. Əliyev injured 22 0 (0) 0 0 0 — —
J. Mickels 32 0 (0) 0 0 0 — starter
K. Parris 26 0 (0) 0 0 0 — starter
X. Severina 25 0 (0) 0 0 0 — rotation
Forwards
Y. Lachaab 21 0 (0) 0 0 0 — depth
P. Mbina 25 0 (0) 0 0 0 — rotation
C. Nwachukwu 20 0 (0) 0 0 0 — rotation
V. Simić 31 0 (0) 0 0 0 — starter

Stats are this season in all competitions. Model role is how much the availability model weighs each player before the game with Borussia Dortmund: core, starter, rotation or depth, from several seasons of minutes and ratings.

Performance

Strength, recent form and playing style.

Strength UEFA Champions League · 36 clubs

L90 Strength34th of 36
26 Elo 1491 · World #272
Current Strength
26 With absences before 20 Oct: +0 Elo
Attack34th of 36
30 Scores 1.26 per match against an average top-five side
Defence34th of 36
27 Concedes 1.95 per match against an average top-five side

In forecast League average

L90 Strength comes from Elo; Attack and Defence from goals scored and conceded, expected goals (xG) and shots on target, all on fixed 0–100 scales shared by every league. These are the numbers the forecast uses.

Strong at both ends Defence first Attack first Struggling Attack → Defence → Paris Saint Germain: attack 91, defence 83, L90 Strength 90 Aston Villa: attack 83, defence 78, L90 Strength 84 Barcelona: attack 97, defence 92, L90 Strength 93 VfB Stuttgart: attack 70, defence 58, L90 Strength 68 Liverpool: attack 85, defence 84, L90 Strength 84 Sporting CP: attack 75, defence 81, L90 Strength 84 Arsenal: attack 86, defence 95, L90 Strength 94 Real Betis: attack 79, defence 59, L90 Strength 72 Real Madrid: attack 89, defence 85, L90 Strength 89 Bayern München: attack 96, defence 90, L90 Strength 94 Shakhtar Donetsk: attack 54, defence 62, L90 Strength 58 Como: attack 72, defence 67, L90 Strength 67 Manchester United: attack 72, defence 80, L90 Strength 79 Villarreal: attack 76, defence 73, L90 Strength 67 Atletico Madrid: attack 82, defence 87, L90 Strength 81 Club Brugge KV: attack 86, defence 58, L90 Strength 76 Manchester City: attack 92, defence 82, L90 Strength 91 Borussia Dortmund: attack 69, defence 80, L90 Strength 81 Lens: attack 63, defence 53, L90 Strength 58 AEK Athens FC: attack 50, defence 57, L90 Strength 53 RB Leipzig: attack 76, defence 53, L90 Strength 68 Sabah FA: attack 30, defence 27, L90 Strength 26 Feyenoord: attack 76, defence 61, L90 Strength 61 Bodo/Glimt: attack 61, defence 64, L90 Strength 60 AS Roma: attack 72, defence 75, L90 Strength 74 PSV Eindhoven: attack 60, defence 64, L90 Strength 74 Viking: attack 18, defence 23, L90 Strength 16 Fenerbahce: attack 75, defence 53, L90 Strength 64 Inter: attack 91, defence 73, L90 Strength 84 FC Porto: attack 74, defence 79, L90 Strength 80 Slavia Praha: attack 41, defence 40, L90 Strength 40 Napoli: attack 61, defence 70, L90 Strength 63 Lask Linz: attack 48, defence 34, L90 Strength 39 Lille: attack 42, defence 60, L90 Strength 56 Galatasaray: attack 57, defence 55, L90 Strength 64 Slovan Bratislava: attack 18, defence 22, L90 Strength 20
Every UEFA Champions League club on the Attack and Defence scales. Dashed lines are the league average. Tap a crest to open that club.

Form last 2 for the index · last 2 listed

56
Form index
Points, last 2
3
Median top-5 club
2.3
Own forecasts
1.7 +1.3
Table22nd L90 Strength34th Form—

Too early in the season to compare table and strength.

Form compares points with what a median top-five club (L90 Strength 50) would take from the same fixtures, so wins over strong sides count for more; 50 is a typical run. "Own forecasts" is the gap to this club's pre-match expectations. Form is context: in our tests it did not improve the forecast.

  • W13 OctH · Slavia Praha2–01.3 xPts
  • L10 SepA · Manchester United0–40.3 xPts

Trends last 2, all competitions

Scored 1/2
Clean sheet 1/2
Conceded 2+ 1/2
Over 2.5 1/2
Both teams scored 0/2

Playing style vs UEFA Champions League average

Sabah FALeagueRank
Goals scored 1.00 2.04 25th
Goals conceded 2.00 2.04 14th
xG — 1.65 —
xG allowed — 1.78 —
Scored in 50% 82% 24th
Clean sheets 50% 18% 2nd
Sabah FALeagueRank
Shots 11.50 14.46 23rd
Shots on target — 5.83 —
On target share 26% 37% 32nd
Box share 62% 64% 23rd
Conversion 9% 14% 25th
Sabah FALeagueRank
Shots allowed 19.50 14.46 31st
On target allowed 9.00 5.77 30th
Blocks 5.50 3.99 5th
Save rate 61% 64% 21st
Sabah FALeagueRank
Possession 44% 50% 26th
Passes 398 469 29th
Pass accuracy 81% 86% 33rd
Sabah FALeagueRank
Fouls 14.00 11.49 31st
Fouls suffered 13.00 11.49 9th
Yellow cards 2.00 1.82 20th
Red cards 0.00 0.06 1st
This league season, per match · 2 games. Rank among 36 clubs; for conceded, allowed, fouls and cards the lowest ranks 1st.
Sabah FALeagueRank
Goals scored 2.00 2.13 20th
Goals conceded 1.10 1.34 9th
xG — 1.96 —
xG allowed — 1.31 —
Scored in 90% 86% 11th
Clean sheets 50% 31% 3rd
Sabah FALeagueRank
Shots 17.14 16.15 11th
Shots on target 7.17 6.07 7th
On target share 36% 37% 20th
Box share 64% 66% 24th
Conversion 13% 13% 22nd
Sabah FALeagueRank
Shots allowed 15.00 12.86 28th
On target allowed 6.00 4.54 30th
Blocks 4.67 3.54 5th
Save rate 63% 69% 32nd
Sabah FALeagueRank
Possession 48% 54% 30th
Passes 415 503 30th
Pass accuracy 83% 86% 32nd
Sabah FALeagueRank
Fouls 13.00 10.94 32nd
Fouls suffered 12.33 11.47 8th
Yellow cards 1.40 1.66 8th
Red cards 0.00 0.05 1st
Last 10 matches, all competitions, per match · 10 games. Rank among 36 clubs; for conceded, allowed, fouls and cards the lowest ranks 1st.

Home and away this league season

Home3.00pts per game1-0-0 · 2.0–0.0 goals · 1 games
Away0.00pts per game0-0-1 · 0.0–4.0 goals · 1 games

Goal timing this league season · 2 games

0-15
1 16-30
2 31-45
1 46-60
1 61-75
1 76-90

scored conceded, per 15 minutes

In forecastVia Att/DefContextLeague average

Possession adjusts the LOAD90 forecast directly. Goals, xG and shots on target feed the Attack and Defence ratings. The rest describes how the team plays and does not change the forecast.

Team rankings UEFA Champions League · 2 games · rank of 36

Attack

GF 2 25th / 36
GF/G 1.00 25th / 36
xG/G — —
G − xG — —

Defence

GA 4 14th / 36
GA/G 2.00 14th / 36
xGA/G — —
xGA − GA — —

Overall

Pts 3 12th / 36
xPts 1.7 32nd / 36
PPG 1.50 12th / 36
TR 6.73 21st / 36
GD -2 23rd / 36
xGD — —
W 1 10th / 36
L 1 12th / 36

Scorelines

  • 0–4×1
  • 2–0×1

Goals per game both teams

0% 0
0% 1
50% 2
0% 3
50% 4
0% 5+

Totals club · league

Over 1.5
100%89%
Over 2.5
50%72%
Over 3.5
50%61%
Both scored
0%64%
Clean sheet
50%18%
Failed to score
50%18%
ClubLeague average

This league season only. xPts adds up our pre-match win and draw chances (pure EloLambda, the same numbers as Form). xG and TR come from match data and describe the season so far; none of these rankings change the forecast directly.