Chelsea
— No complete reference snapshot for this forecast.
Chelsea
6th · 48 pts · 32 played
LWLLL
0–1Full time
Manchester United
3rd · 55 pts · 32 played
WLWDL
Chelsea44.8%fair odds 2.23
Draw23.2%fair odds 4.31
Manchester United32.0%fair odds 3.12
Expected goals1.88 – 1.57total 3.44
Likeliest score1–19.9%
Everything on this tab comes from one score matrix: the LOAD90 forecast (EloLambda with attack and defence, availability, playing style and High Congestion) turned into a probability for every scoreline with the Dixon–Coles low-score correction. Fair odds are 1 ÷ probability, with no bookmaker margin. This is a probability model, not betting advice; for odds and value see eScored.
Match Opportunity
How this opponent changes expected goals compared with an average opponent from each team's domestic league.
Manchester United
— No complete reference snapshot for this forecast.
About this comparison
The same LOAD90 model is run against a virtual opponent with the league's average Elo, raw attack and defence parameters and standardised possession, with no extra absences or high congestion. Your team's strength, squad availability, congestion and the match's venue context are kept. This measures opponent opportunity, not a change in your team's form. Positive attack change is favorable; negative conceding change is favorable. Clean-sheet changes are percentage points. Values are locked at kick-off.
Score matrix
| Chelsea ↓ · Manchester United → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 1 | 5.5 | 9.9 | 7.4 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| 2 | 5.6 | 8.8 | 6.9 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 3 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 4.3 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 4 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 5 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 6+ | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Chance of each exact score, in %. Rows are Chelsea goals, columns Manchester United goals; 6+ adds up six goals or more.
Most likely scores
- 1–19.9%10.11
- 2–18.8%11.34
- 1–27.4%13.58
- 2–26.9%14.48
- 2–05.6%17.78
- 3–15.5%18.14
- 1–05.5%18.19
- 0–14.5%22.17
- 3–24.3%23.15
- 0–23.9%25.48
Winning margin
11.3%
Chelsea by 3+
fair 8.87
13.6%
Chelsea by 2
fair 7.35
19.9%
Chelsea by 1
fair 5.03
23.2%
Draw
fair 4.31
16.5%
Manchester United by 1
fair 6.06
9.5%
Manchester United by 2
fair 10.53
6.0%
Manchester United by 3+
fair 16.61
Goal distribution
Total goals
4%0
10%1
19%2
22%3
19%4
26%5+
Chelsea goals
15%0
29%1
27%2
17%3
12%4+
Manchester United goals
21%0
33%1
26%2
13%3
7%4+
LOAD90 vs pure EloLambda
| LOAD90 | EloLambda | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chelsea win | 44.8% | 43.5% | +1.2 pp |
| Draw | 23.2% | 24.6% | -1.4 pp |
| Manchester United win | 32.0% | 31.9% | +0.1 pp |
| Over 2.5 | 66.9% | 60.7% | +6.1 pp |
| Both teams score | 67.5% | 62.9% | +4.6 pp |
| Expected goals Chelsea | 1.88 | 1.71 | +0.17 |
| Expected goals Manchester United | 1.57 | 1.43 | +0.13 |
EloLambda is the stable eScored model without the LOAD90 factors. The change column is what playing style and High Congestion add for this match; see the methodology.
All markets model probability and fair odds
Result
- Chelsea win44.8%2.23
- Draw23.2%4.31
- Manchester United win32.0%3.12
- Double chance Chelsea or draw68.0%1.47
- Double chance Chelsea or Manchester United76.8%1.30
- Double chance Manchester United or draw55.2%1.81
- Draw no bet Chelsea58.3%1.72
- Draw no bet Manchester United41.7%2.40
Goals
- Over 0.596.3%1.04
- Over 1.586.3%1.16
- Over 2.566.9%1.50
- Over 3.545.1%2.22
- Over 4.526.4%3.79
- Under 1.513.7%7.30
- Under 2.533.1%3.02
- Under 3.554.9%1.82
Both teams to score
- Yes67.5%1.48
- No32.5%3.08
- Yes and over 2.557.6%1.74
- Chelsea win and yes27.6%3.63
- Draw and yes19.5%5.12
- Manchester United win and yes20.4%4.90
Team goals
- Chelsea over 0.584.7%1.18
- Chelsea over 1.555.9%1.79
- Chelsea over 2.529.0%3.45
- Manchester United over 0.579.1%1.26
- Manchester United over 1.546.4%2.15
- Manchester United over 2.520.8%4.80
- Chelsea clean sheet20.9%4.79
- Manchester United clean sheet15.3%6.53
- Chelsea win to nil17.2%5.82
- Manchester United win to nil11.6%8.60
Handicap
- Chelsea −1.524.9%4.02
- Chelsea −2.511.3%8.87
- Manchester United +1.575.1%1.33
- Manchester United +2.588.7%1.13
- Manchester United −1.515.5%6.44
- Chelsea +1.584.5%1.18
Corners, cards and shots are not forecast by LOAD90; their actual averages are on the Overview tab.
Model track record Premier League 2025-2026
All LOAD90 forecasts before this match.
Matches scored323
Favourite won48.3%
Avg chance given to result38.8%
1X2 Brier0.628
Over 2.5 called right54.8%
BTTS called right55.1%
Calibration · when the favourite was given…
| Favourite chance | Matches | Predicted | Actually won |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30–40% | 47 | 38.3% | 36.2% |
| 40–50% | 117 | 45.0% | 44.4% |
| 50–60% | 89 | 54.9% | 52.8% |
| 60–70% | 43 | 64.2% | 55.8% |
| 70–80% | 24 | 73.7% | 54.2% |
| 80%+ | 3 | 82.8% | 100.0% |
LOAD90 vs Bookmaker
Compared on the same 264 of 323 scored matches.
| LOAD90 | Bookmaker | |
|---|---|---|
| 1X2 Brier (lower is better) | 0.6292 | 0.6179 |
| Avg chance given to result | 38.7% | 39.5% |
| Favourite won | 47.7% | 49.2% |
Bookmaker probabilities come from pre-match 1X2 odds supplied by eScored, with the margin removed. Prices may have been recorded at different times before kick-off. Bookmaker identity is unavailable for 264 archived lines; these prices may come from different bookmakers.
Latest results
- ✗Tottenham 2–2 Brighton27·24·49
- ✓Leeds 3–0 Wolves62·22·17
- ✗Newcastle 1–2 Bournemouth39·23·38
- ✗Brentford 0–0 Fulham47·25·28
- ✗Manchester United 1–2 Leeds58·23·19
- ✓Chelsea 0–3 Manchester City38·24·38
- ✓Sunderland 1–0 Tottenham46·25·29
- ✗Nottingham Forest 1–1 Aston Villa40·27·33
- ✓Crystal Palace 2–1 Newcastle47·24·29
- ✓Liverpool 2–0 Fulham58·21·21
Pre-match forecasts only. 0 of 323 were published live before kick-off; the rest were rebuilt after the match from pre-match data, never using the result. Numbers are home · draw · away chances, the actual result in bold. A good model's favourites in the 60–70% row should win about 65% of the time.