Clubs Compare

FC Augsburg vs FC Schalke 04

Real strength. Different football profiles.

FC Augsburg

Bundesliga · 2026-2027

Rating as of 20 Oct 2026
Power49.5

FC Schalke 04

Bundesliga · 2026-2027

Rating as of 20 Oct 2026
Power45.7
The football profile

Club DNA

FC AugsburgFC Schalke 04

Strength Profile · Current

Fixed 0–100 ratings. Power is the Elo baseline; Attack and Defence use a common reference opponent. Form is opponent-adjusted.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability FC Augsburg · Power 49.5 ptsFC Augsburg · Attack 72.3 ptsFC Augsburg · Defence 23.3 ptsFC Augsburg · Form 46.3 ptsFC Augsburg · Consistency 58.2 ptsFC Augsburg · Squad Availability 85.9 % FC Schalke 04 · Power 45.7 ptsFC Schalke 04 · Attack 33.2 ptsFC Schalke 04 · Defence 50.0 ptsFC Schalke 04 · Form 41.0 ptsFC Schalke 04 · Squad Availability 89.0 % Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability FC Augsburg · Power 49.5 ptsFC Augsburg · Attack 72.3 ptsFC Augsburg · Defence 23.3 ptsFC Augsburg · Form 46.3 ptsFC Augsburg · Consistency 58.2 ptsFC Augsburg · Squad Availability 85.9 % FC Schalke 04 · Power 45.7 ptsFC Schalke 04 · Attack 33.2 ptsFC Schalke 04 · Defence 50.0 ptsFC Schalke 04 · Form 41.0 ptsFC Schalke 04 · Squad Availability 89.0 %
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

49.5Power45.7
FC Augsburg +3.8 pts
72.3Attack33.2
FC Augsburg +39.1 pts
23.3Defence50.0
FC Schalke 04 +26.7 pts
46.3Form41.0
FC Augsburg +5.3 pts
58.2Consistency—
Shared data unavailable
85.9%Squad Availability89.0%
FC Schalke 04 +3.1 pp

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

  • FC Augsburg has the stronger attacking profile.
  • FC Schalke 04 holds the defensive advantage.
  • FC Augsburg shows better recent form.
  • FC Schalke 04 had more of its weighted squad available for its last completed match.
Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

FC Augsburg · Form 5/5 · Consistency 20/20 covered matches · 2 pre-match / 18 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 17 Oct 2026

FC Schalke 04 · Form 5/5 · Consistency 6/6 covered matches · 2 pre-match / 4 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 17 Oct 2026

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

FC Augsburg · Current gap SD 1.25 points · mean gap 0.21 · Full window

FC Schalke 04 · Current gap SD 1.16 points · mean gap -0.26 · Insufficient sample

Playing Style · Current

Observed profile · last 10 matches before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 FC Augsburg · Possession 41.0 %FC Augsburg · Pass accuracy 77.1 %FC Augsburg · Shots in the box 71.7 %FC Augsburg · On target share 41.7 %FC Augsburg · Shot Frequency 4.2 shots/100 passesFC Augsburg · Corner Pressure 5.8 corners/90 FC Schalke 04 · Possession 45.1 %FC Schalke 04 · Pass accuracy 73.2 %FC Schalke 04 · Shots in the box 75.5 %FC Schalke 04 · On target share 35.5 %FC Schalke 04 · Shot Frequency 2.9 shots/100 passesFC Schalke 04 · Corner Pressure 3.4 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 FC Augsburg · Possession 41.0 %FC Augsburg · Pass accuracy 77.1 %FC Augsburg · Shots in the box 71.7 %FC Augsburg · On target share 41.7 %FC Augsburg · Shot Frequency 4.2 shots/100 passesFC Augsburg · Corner Pressure 5.8 corners/90 FC Schalke 04 · Possession 45.1 %FC Schalke 04 · Pass accuracy 73.2 %FC Schalke 04 · Shots in the box 75.5 %FC Schalke 04 · On target share 35.5 %FC Schalke 04 · Shot Frequency 2.9 shots/100 passesFC Schalke 04 · Corner Pressure 3.4 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

41.0%Possession45.1%
FC Schalke 04 +4.1 pp
77.1%Pass accuracy73.2%
FC Augsburg +3.9 pp
71.7%Shots in the box75.5%
FC Schalke 04 +3.8 pp
41.7%On target share35.5%
FC Augsburg +6.2 pp
4.2Shot Frequency2.9
FC Augsburg +1.4 shots/100 passes
5.8Corner Pressure3.4
FC Augsburg +2.4 corners/90

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

FC Augsburg · Window 10 matches · before 24 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 10/10 · Corner Pressure 10/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

FC Schalke 04 · Window 10 matches · before 24 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 10/10 · Corner Pressure 9/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Strength Profile · Season Average

Match-sampled averages of available ratings this season, across tracked competitions. These are not time-weighted averages or a measure of consistency.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability FC Augsburg · Power 49.2 ptsFC Augsburg · Form 70.0 ptsFC Augsburg · Consistency 57.6 pts FC Schalke 04 · Power 47.4 ptsFC Schalke 04 · Form 51.1 pts Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability FC Augsburg · Power 49.2 ptsFC Augsburg · Form 70.0 ptsFC Augsburg · Consistency 57.6 pts FC Schalke 04 · Power 47.4 ptsFC Schalke 04 · Form 51.1 pts
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

49.2Power47.4
FC Augsburg +1.8 pts
—Attack—
Shared data unavailable
—Defence—
Shared data unavailable
70.0Form51.1
FC Augsburg +18.9 pts
57.6Consistency—
Shared data unavailable
—Squad Availability—
Shared data unavailable

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

  • FC Augsburg has the higher average Form value.
Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

FC Augsburg · Power 6 · Attack 2 · Defence 2 · Form 3 · Consistency 6 · Squad Availability 2 · 2 pre-match / 4 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

FC Schalke 04 · Power 6 · Attack 2 · Defence 2 · Form 3 · Consistency 0 · Squad Availability 2 · 2 pre-match / 4 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

FC Augsburg · Current gap SD 1.25 points · mean gap 0.21 · Full window

FC Schalke 04 · Current gap SD 1.16 points · mean gap -0.26 · Insufficient sample

Playing Style · Season Average

Observed profile · league season before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 FC Augsburg · Possession 41.5 %FC Augsburg · Pass accuracy 77.4 %FC Augsburg · Shots in the box 72.3 %FC Augsburg · On target share 44.7 %FC Augsburg · Shot Frequency 4.2 shots/100 passesFC Augsburg · Corner Pressure 6.0 corners/90 FC Schalke 04 · Possession 39.8 %FC Schalke 04 · Pass accuracy 69.5 %FC Schalke 04 · Shots in the box 71.8 %FC Schalke 04 · On target share 34.4 %FC Schalke 04 · Shot Frequency 2.9 shots/100 passesFC Schalke 04 · Corner Pressure 3.6 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 FC Augsburg · Possession 41.5 %FC Augsburg · Pass accuracy 77.4 %FC Augsburg · Shots in the box 72.3 %FC Augsburg · On target share 44.7 %FC Augsburg · Shot Frequency 4.2 shots/100 passesFC Augsburg · Corner Pressure 6.0 corners/90 FC Schalke 04 · Possession 39.8 %FC Schalke 04 · Pass accuracy 69.5 %FC Schalke 04 · Shots in the box 71.8 %FC Schalke 04 · On target share 34.4 %FC Schalke 04 · Shot Frequency 2.9 shots/100 passesFC Schalke 04 · Corner Pressure 3.6 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

41.5%Possession39.8%
FC Augsburg +1.7 pp
77.4%Pass accuracy69.5%
FC Augsburg +7.9 pp
72.3%Shots in the box71.8%
FC Augsburg +0.5 pp
44.7%On target share34.4%
FC Augsburg +10.3 pp
4.2Shot Frequency2.9
FC Augsburg +1.3 shots/100 passes
6.0Corner Pressure3.6
FC Augsburg +2.4 corners/90

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

FC Augsburg · Window 6 matches · before 24 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 6/6 · Corner Pressure 6/6 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

FC Schalke 04 · Window 6 matches · before 24 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 6/6 · Corner Pressure 5/6 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

The season so far

Historical Trend

Power · 0–100

Base Power at recorded match dates. Solid lines join saved pre-match ratings; dashed segments include historical Elo backfills. The same fixed scale is used for both clubs.

Season Power historyAvailable pre-match Power observations and historical Elo backfills. Lines connect observations, not daily measurements. Exact dates and values are available in the table below. 0255075100 FC Augsburg · 2026-08-30 15:30:00 UTC · 45 · backfill FC Augsburg · 2026-09-06 15:30:00 UTC · 47.1 · backfill FC Augsburg · 2026-09-12 13:30:00 UTC · 50.9 · backfill FC Augsburg · 2026-09-19 13:30:00 UTC · 51.2 · backfill FC Augsburg · 2026-10-10 13:30:00 UTC · 49.8 · pre FC Augsburg · 2026-10-17 13:30:00 UTC · 51 · pre FC Schalke 04 · 2026-08-30 15:30:00 UTC · 47.4 · backfill FC Schalke 04 · 2026-09-05 16:30:00 UTC · 45.2 · backfill FC Schalke 04 · 2026-09-11 18:30:00 UTC · 46.5 · backfill FC Schalke 04 · 2026-09-20 15:30:00 UTC · 49.2 · backfill FC Schalke 04 · 2026-10-11 15:30:00 UTC · 48.5 · pre FC Schalke 04 · 2026-10-17 13:30:00 UTC · 47.7 · pre 30 Aug 202617 Oct 2026
FC AugsburgFC Schalke 04
View history data and coverage
ClubDate (UTC)PowerSource
FC Augsburg2026-08-30 15:30:0045.0Historical Elo backfill
FC Augsburg2026-09-06 15:30:0047.1Historical Elo backfill
FC Augsburg2026-09-12 13:30:0050.9Historical Elo backfill
FC Augsburg2026-09-19 13:30:0051.2Historical Elo backfill
FC Augsburg2026-10-10 13:30:0049.8Saved pre-match
FC Augsburg2026-10-17 13:30:0051.0Saved pre-match
FC Schalke 042026-08-30 15:30:0047.4Historical Elo backfill
FC Schalke 042026-09-05 16:30:0045.2Historical Elo backfill
FC Schalke 042026-09-11 18:30:0046.5Historical Elo backfill
FC Schalke 042026-09-20 15:30:0049.2Historical Elo backfill
FC Schalke 042026-10-11 15:30:0048.5Saved pre-match
FC Schalke 042026-10-17 13:30:0047.7Saved pre-match
Chances, finishing & results

Efficiency

From chances to results. Exact values share a scale within each row; colours identify the clubs.

Last 10

FC Augsburg
FC Schalke 04
ConversionGoals / shots · %
15.2% 10/10 covered
8.2% 10/10 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
70.6% 10/10 covered
79.2% 10/10 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
+0.28 10/10 covered
-0.41 10/10 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
+0.35 10/10 covered
+0.30 10/10 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
0.134 10/10 covered
0.120 10/10 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
15.1 10/10 covered
11.0 10/10 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
2.15 6/6 covered
1.08 6/6 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
2.95 6/6 covered
1.87 6/6 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
1.33 6/6 league matches
0.83 6/6 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
-0.95 5/5 Form window
-0.42 5/5 Form window

FC Augsburg · Statistics before 24 Oct 2026 · Recent results L · D · L · D · W

FC Schalke 04 · Statistics before 24 Oct 2026 · Recent results L · L · D · W · D

League season

FC Augsburg
FC Schalke 04
ConversionGoals / shots · %
17.0% 6/6 covered
6.6% 6/6 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
70.2% 6/6 covered
83.8% 6/6 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
+0.52 6/6 covered
-0.41 6/6 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
+0.95 6/6 covered
+0.70 6/6 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
0.137 6/6 covered
0.106 6/6 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
15.7 6/6 covered
10.2 6/6 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
2.15 6/6 covered
1.08 6/6 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
2.95 6/6 covered
1.87 6/6 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
1.33 6/6 league matches
0.83 6/6 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
-0.95 5/5 Form window
-0.42 5/5 Form window

FC Augsburg · Statistics before 24 Oct 2026 · Recent results L · D · L · D · W

FC Schalke 04 · Statistics before 24 Oct 2026 · Recent results L · L · D · W · D

Positive Goals − xG means more goals scored than the observed chances predicted. Positive xGA − GA means fewer goals conceded than those chances predicted; it reflects defence and goalkeeping together. Gaps are per covered match and pair goals and xG on the same matches. Shot Quality pairs total xG and total shots. Minimum three known matches per metric; missing data stays unavailable.

Butterfly bars grow from the centre towards each club. Length shows magnitude, not superiority; negative gaps use stripes and a minus sign. Percentages use 0–100%, PPG uses 0–3; other rows share the larger absolute value as their limit. xG, xGA and PPG retain their league-season window. Points vs expected retains the latest up to five completed matches with stored pure forecasts across tracked competitions; results are newest first. These observed metrics are not adjusted for league or opponent strength.

About this comparison

Strength ratings share LOAD90’s fixed scales across leagues. Elo reflects opponent quality; Attack and Defence describe performance against the same reference club on a neutral pitch. Form adjusts for opponents and venue. League Strength is not added a second time. Cross-league ratings remain model estimates; sparse connections between leagues and incomplete data limit precision. Explore the methodology →