Clubs Compare

Inter vs Shakhtar Donetsk

Real strength. Different football profiles.

Inter

Serie A · 2026-2027

Rating as of 20 Oct 2026
Power83.6

Shakhtar Donetsk

UEFA Champions League · 2026-2027

Rating as of 20 Oct 2026
Power57.6
The football profile

Club DNA

InterShakhtar Donetsk

Strength Profile · Current

Fixed 0–100 ratings. Power is the Elo baseline; Attack and Defence use a common reference opponent. Form is opponent-adjusted.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability Inter · Power 83.6 ptsInter · Attack 90.9 ptsInter · Defence 72.7 ptsInter · Form 76.3 ptsInter · Consistency 65.3 ptsInter · Squad Availability 84.6 % Shakhtar Donetsk · Power 57.6 ptsShakhtar Donetsk · Attack 53.9 ptsShakhtar Donetsk · Defence 61.9 pts Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability Inter · Power 83.6 ptsInter · Attack 90.9 ptsInter · Defence 72.7 ptsInter · Form 76.3 ptsInter · Consistency 65.3 ptsInter · Squad Availability 84.6 % Shakhtar Donetsk · Power 57.6 ptsShakhtar Donetsk · Attack 53.9 ptsShakhtar Donetsk · Defence 61.9 pts
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

83.6Power57.6
Inter +26.0 pts
90.9Attack53.9
Inter +37.0 pts
72.7Defence61.9
Inter +10.8 pts
76.3Form—
Shared data unavailable
65.3Consistency—
Shared data unavailable
84.6%Squad Availability—
Shared data unavailable

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

  • Inter has the stronger attacking profile.
  • Inter has the higher Power rating.
  • Inter holds the defensive advantage.
Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

Inter · Form 5/5 · Consistency 20/20 covered matches · 3 pre-match / 17 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 17 Oct 2026

Shakhtar Donetsk · Form 2/5 · Consistency 2/2 covered matches · 0 pre-match / 2 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 14 Oct 2026

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

Inter · Current gap SD 1.04 points · mean gap 0.04 · Full window

Shakhtar Donetsk · Current gap SD 0.47 points · mean gap 0.90 · Insufficient sample

Playing Style · Current

Observed profile · last 10 matches before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 Inter · Possession 61.0 %Inter · Pass accuracy 90.3 %Inter · Shots in the box 70.4 %Inter · On target share 34.3 %Inter · Shot Frequency 3.6 shots/100 passesInter · Corner Pressure 6.0 corners/90 Shakhtar Donetsk · Possession 55.5 %Shakhtar Donetsk · Pass accuracy 87.9 %Shakhtar Donetsk · Shots in the box 62.1 %Shakhtar Donetsk · On target share 31.1 %Shakhtar Donetsk · Shot Frequency 2.8 shots/100 passesShakhtar Donetsk · Corner Pressure 4.8 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 Inter · Possession 61.0 %Inter · Pass accuracy 90.3 %Inter · Shots in the box 70.4 %Inter · On target share 34.3 %Inter · Shot Frequency 3.6 shots/100 passesInter · Corner Pressure 6.0 corners/90 Shakhtar Donetsk · Possession 55.5 %Shakhtar Donetsk · Pass accuracy 87.9 %Shakhtar Donetsk · Shots in the box 62.1 %Shakhtar Donetsk · On target share 31.1 %Shakhtar Donetsk · Shot Frequency 2.8 shots/100 passesShakhtar Donetsk · Corner Pressure 4.8 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

61.0%Possession55.5%
Inter +5.5 pp
90.3%Pass accuracy87.9%
Inter +2.4 pp
70.4%Shots in the box62.1%
Inter +8.3 pp
34.3%On target share31.1%
Inter +3.2 pp
3.6Shot Frequency2.8
Inter +0.8 shots/100 passes
6.0Corner Pressure4.8
Inter +1.3 corners/90

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

Inter · Window 10 matches · before 25 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 10/10 · Corner Pressure 10/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Shakhtar Donetsk · Window 10 matches · before 21 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 8/10 · Corner Pressure 8/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Strength Profile · Season Average

Match-sampled averages of available ratings this season, across tracked competitions. These are not time-weighted averages or a measure of consistency.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability Inter · Power 83.8 ptsInter · Attack 86.8 ptsInter · Defence 76.2 ptsInter · Form 77.3 ptsInter · Consistency 68.1 ptsInter · Squad Availability 89.7 % Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability Inter · Power 83.8 ptsInter · Attack 86.8 ptsInter · Defence 76.2 ptsInter · Form 77.3 ptsInter · Consistency 68.1 ptsInter · Squad Availability 89.7 %
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

83.8Power—
Shared data unavailable
86.8Attack—
Shared data unavailable
76.2Defence—
Shared data unavailable
77.3Form—
Shared data unavailable
68.1Consistency—
Shared data unavailable
89.7%Squad Availability—
Shared data unavailable

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

There is not enough shared rating data to explain an advantage yet.

Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

Inter · Power 9 · Attack 3 · Defence 3 · Form 6 · Consistency 9 · Squad Availability 3 · 3 pre-match / 6 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

Shakhtar Donetsk · Power 2 · Attack 0 · Defence 0 · Form 0 · Consistency 0 · Squad Availability 0 · 0 pre-match / 2 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

Inter · Current gap SD 1.04 points · mean gap 0.04 · Full window

Shakhtar Donetsk · Current gap SD 0.47 points · mean gap 0.90 · Insufficient sample

Playing Style · Season Average

Observed profile · league season before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 Inter · Possession 62.6 %Inter · Pass accuracy 90.2 %Inter · Shots in the box 70.1 %Inter · On target share 33.8 %Inter · Shot Frequency 3.5 shots/100 passesInter · Corner Pressure 5.9 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 Inter · Possession 62.6 %Inter · Pass accuracy 90.2 %Inter · Shots in the box 70.1 %Inter · On target share 33.8 %Inter · Shot Frequency 3.5 shots/100 passesInter · Corner Pressure 5.9 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

62.6%Possession—
Shared data unavailable
90.2%Pass accuracy—
Shared data unavailable
70.1%Shots in the box—
Shared data unavailable
33.8%On target share—
Shared data unavailable
3.5Shot Frequency—
Shared data unavailable
5.9Corner Pressure—
Shared data unavailable

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

Inter · Window 7 matches · before 25 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 7/7 · Corner Pressure 7/7 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Shakhtar Donetsk · Window 2 matches · before 21 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 2/2 · Corner Pressure 2/2 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

The season so far

Historical Trend

Power · 0–100

Base Power at recorded match dates. Solid lines join saved pre-match ratings; dashed segments include historical Elo backfills. The same fixed scale is used for both clubs.

Season Power historyAvailable pre-match Power observations and historical Elo backfills. Lines connect observations, not daily measurements. Exact dates and values are available in the table below. 0255075100 Inter · 2026-08-22 16:30:00 UTC · 83.5 · backfill Inter · 2026-08-30 18:45:00 UTC · 83.6 · backfill Inter · 2026-09-05 16:00:00 UTC · 83.9 · backfill Inter · 2026-09-08 19:00:00 UTC · 84.3 · backfill Inter · 2026-09-14 18:45:00 UTC · 83.7 · backfill Inter · 2026-09-19 16:00:00 UTC · 84 · backfill Inter · 2026-10-10 16:00:00 UTC · 84 · pre Inter · 2026-10-13 19:00:00 UTC · 84.2 · pre Inter · 2026-10-17 16:00:00 UTC · 82.8 · pre Shakhtar Donetsk · 2026-09-10 16:45:00 UTC · 54.9 · backfill Shakhtar Donetsk · 2026-10-14 19:00:00 UTC · 56 · backfill 22 Aug 202617 Oct 2026
InterShakhtar Donetsk
View history data and coverage
ClubDate (UTC)PowerSource
Inter2026-08-22 16:30:0083.5Historical Elo backfill
Inter2026-08-30 18:45:0083.6Historical Elo backfill
Inter2026-09-05 16:00:0083.9Historical Elo backfill
Inter2026-09-08 19:00:0084.3Historical Elo backfill
Inter2026-09-14 18:45:0083.7Historical Elo backfill
Inter2026-09-19 16:00:0084.0Historical Elo backfill
Inter2026-10-10 16:00:0084.0Saved pre-match
Inter2026-10-13 19:00:0084.2Saved pre-match
Inter2026-10-17 16:00:0082.8Saved pre-match
Shakhtar Donetsk2026-09-10 16:45:0054.9Historical Elo backfill
Shakhtar Donetsk2026-10-14 19:00:0056.0Historical Elo backfill
Chances, finishing & results

Efficiency

From chances to results. Exact values share a scale within each row; colours identify the clubs.

Last 10

Inter
Shakhtar Donetsk
ConversionGoals / shots · %
13.3% 10/10 covered
14.6% 8/10 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
64.1% 9/10 covered
59.4% 8/10 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
+0.27 8/10 covered
+0.96 7/10 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
-0.39 8/10 covered
-0.31 7/10 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
0.136 8/10 covered
0.076 7/10 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
21.0 10/10 covered
12.9 8/10 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
2.67 6/7 covered
— 1/2 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
0.92 6/7 covered
— 1/2 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
2.71 7/7 league matches
— 2/2 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
-0.01 5/5 Form window
— 2/5 Form window

Inter · Statistics before 25 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · L · W · D · W

Shakhtar Donetsk · Statistics before 21 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · D

League season

Inter
Shakhtar Donetsk
ConversionGoals / shots · %
13.9% 7/7 covered
— 2/2 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
68.0% 6/7 covered
— 2/2 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
+0.33 6/7 covered
— 1/2 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
-0.25 6/7 covered
— 1/2 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
0.131 6/7 covered
— 1/2 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
21.6 7/7 covered
— 2/2 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
2.67 6/7 covered
— 1/2 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
0.92 6/7 covered
— 1/2 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
2.71 7/7 league matches
— 2/2 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
-0.01 5/5 Form window
— 2/5 Form window

Inter · Statistics before 25 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · L · W · D · W

Shakhtar Donetsk · Statistics before 21 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · D

Positive Goals − xG means more goals scored than the observed chances predicted. Positive xGA − GA means fewer goals conceded than those chances predicted; it reflects defence and goalkeeping together. Gaps are per covered match and pair goals and xG on the same matches. Shot Quality pairs total xG and total shots. Minimum three known matches per metric; missing data stays unavailable.

Butterfly bars grow from the centre towards each club. Length shows magnitude, not superiority; negative gaps use stripes and a minus sign. Percentages use 0–100%, PPG uses 0–3; other rows share the larger absolute value as their limit. xG, xGA and PPG retain their league-season window. Points vs expected retains the latest up to five completed matches with stored pure forecasts across tracked competitions; results are newest first. These observed metrics are not adjusted for league or opponent strength.

About this comparison

Strength ratings share LOAD90’s fixed scales across leagues. Elo reflects opponent quality; Attack and Defence describe performance against the same reference club on a neutral pitch. Form adjusts for opponents and venue. League Strength is not added a second time. Cross-league ratings remain model estimates; sparse connections between leagues and incomplete data limit precision. Explore the methodology →