Clubs Compare

Stade Brestois 29 vs Toulouse

Real strength. Different football profiles.

Toulouse

Ligue 1 · 2026-2027

Rating as of 20 Oct 2026
Power38.9
The football profile

Club DNA

Stade Brestois 29Toulouse

Strength Profile · Current

Fixed 0–100 ratings. Power is the Elo baseline; Attack and Defence use a common reference opponent. Form is opponent-adjusted.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability Stade Brestois 29 · Power 33.8 ptsStade Brestois 29 · Attack 47.0 ptsStade Brestois 29 · Defence 36.3 ptsStade Brestois 29 · Form 48.5 ptsStade Brestois 29 · Consistency 67.0 ptsStade Brestois 29 · Squad Availability 87.0 % Toulouse · Power 38.9 ptsToulouse · Attack 44.6 ptsToulouse · Defence 48.9 ptsToulouse · Form 54.4 ptsToulouse · Consistency 61.9 ptsToulouse · Squad Availability 99.4 % Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability Stade Brestois 29 · Power 33.8 ptsStade Brestois 29 · Attack 47.0 ptsStade Brestois 29 · Defence 36.3 ptsStade Brestois 29 · Form 48.5 ptsStade Brestois 29 · Consistency 67.0 ptsStade Brestois 29 · Squad Availability 87.0 % Toulouse · Power 38.9 ptsToulouse · Attack 44.6 ptsToulouse · Defence 48.9 ptsToulouse · Form 54.4 ptsToulouse · Consistency 61.9 ptsToulouse · Squad Availability 99.4 %
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

33.8Power38.9
Toulouse +5.1 pts
47.0Attack44.6
Stade Brestois 29 +2.4 pts
36.3Defence48.9
Toulouse +12.6 pts
48.5Form54.4
Toulouse +5.9 pts
67.0Consistency61.9
Stade Brestois 29 +5.1 pts
87.0%Squad Availability99.4%
Toulouse +12.4 pp

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

  • Toulouse holds the defensive advantage.
  • Toulouse shows better recent form.
  • Toulouse has the higher Power rating.
  • Toulouse had more of its weighted squad available for its last completed match.
Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

Stade Brestois 29 · Form 5/5 · Consistency 20/20 covered matches · 2 pre-match / 18 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 17 Oct 2026

Toulouse · Form 5/5 · Consistency 20/20 covered matches · 2 pre-match / 18 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 16 Oct 2026

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

Stade Brestois 29 · Current gap SD 0.99 points · mean gap -0.15 · Full window

Toulouse · Current gap SD 1.14 points · mean gap -0.01 · Full window

Playing Style · Current

Observed profile · last 10 matches before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 Stade Brestois 29 · Possession 45.8 %Stade Brestois 29 · Pass accuracy 82.3 %Stade Brestois 29 · Shots in the box 64.2 %Stade Brestois 29 · On target share 32.9 %Stade Brestois 29 · Shot Frequency 3.9 shots/100 passesStade Brestois 29 · Corner Pressure 4.7 corners/90 Toulouse · Possession 48.0 %Toulouse · Pass accuracy 85.6 %Toulouse · Shots in the box 62.2 %Toulouse · On target share 35.4 %Toulouse · Shot Frequency 3.0 shots/100 passesToulouse · Corner Pressure 4.1 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 Stade Brestois 29 · Possession 45.8 %Stade Brestois 29 · Pass accuracy 82.3 %Stade Brestois 29 · Shots in the box 64.2 %Stade Brestois 29 · On target share 32.9 %Stade Brestois 29 · Shot Frequency 3.9 shots/100 passesStade Brestois 29 · Corner Pressure 4.7 corners/90 Toulouse · Possession 48.0 %Toulouse · Pass accuracy 85.6 %Toulouse · Shots in the box 62.2 %Toulouse · On target share 35.4 %Toulouse · Shot Frequency 3.0 shots/100 passesToulouse · Corner Pressure 4.1 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

45.8%Possession48.0%
Toulouse +2.2 pp
82.3%Pass accuracy85.6%
Toulouse +3.3 pp
64.2%Shots in the box62.2%
Stade Brestois 29 +2.1 pp
32.9%On target share35.4%
Toulouse +2.5 pp
3.9Shot Frequency3.0
Stade Brestois 29 +0.9 shots/100 passes
4.7Corner Pressure4.1
Stade Brestois 29 +0.6 corners/90

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

Stade Brestois 29 · Window 10 matches · before 23 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 10/10 · Corner Pressure 10/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Toulouse · Window 10 matches · before 24 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 10/10 · Corner Pressure 10/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Strength Profile · Season Average

Match-sampled averages of available ratings this season, across tracked competitions. These are not time-weighted averages or a measure of consistency.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability Stade Brestois 29 · Power 32.1 ptsStade Brestois 29 · Form 40.9 ptsStade Brestois 29 · Consistency 66.0 pts Toulouse · Power 35.0 ptsToulouse · Form 26.8 ptsToulouse · Consistency 59.7 pts Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability Stade Brestois 29 · Power 32.1 ptsStade Brestois 29 · Form 40.9 ptsStade Brestois 29 · Consistency 66.0 pts Toulouse · Power 35.0 ptsToulouse · Form 26.8 ptsToulouse · Consistency 59.7 pts
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

32.1Power35.0
Toulouse +2.9 pts
—Attack—
Shared data unavailable
—Defence—
Shared data unavailable
40.9Form26.8
Stade Brestois 29 +14.1 pts
66.0Consistency59.7
Stade Brestois 29 +6.3 pts
—Squad Availability—
Shared data unavailable

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

  • Stade Brestois 29 has the higher average Form value.
  • Stade Brestois 29 has the higher average Consistency value.
Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

Stade Brestois 29 · Power 7 · Attack 2 · Defence 2 · Form 4 · Consistency 7 · Squad Availability 2 · 2 pre-match / 5 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

Toulouse · Power 7 · Attack 2 · Defence 2 · Form 4 · Consistency 7 · Squad Availability 2 · 2 pre-match / 5 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

Stade Brestois 29 · Current gap SD 0.99 points · mean gap -0.15 · Full window

Toulouse · Current gap SD 1.14 points · mean gap -0.01 · Full window

Playing Style · Season Average

Observed profile · league season before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 Stade Brestois 29 · Possession 45.7 %Stade Brestois 29 · Pass accuracy 81.7 %Stade Brestois 29 · Shots in the box 62.9 %Stade Brestois 29 · On target share 34.2 %Stade Brestois 29 · Shot Frequency 4.2 shots/100 passesStade Brestois 29 · Corner Pressure 4.9 corners/90 Toulouse · Possession 50.3 %Toulouse · Pass accuracy 86.1 %Toulouse · Shots in the box 64.7 %Toulouse · On target share 33.7 %Toulouse · Shot Frequency 2.7 shots/100 passesToulouse · Corner Pressure 4.1 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 Stade Brestois 29 · Possession 45.7 %Stade Brestois 29 · Pass accuracy 81.7 %Stade Brestois 29 · Shots in the box 62.9 %Stade Brestois 29 · On target share 34.2 %Stade Brestois 29 · Shot Frequency 4.2 shots/100 passesStade Brestois 29 · Corner Pressure 4.9 corners/90 Toulouse · Possession 50.3 %Toulouse · Pass accuracy 86.1 %Toulouse · Shots in the box 64.7 %Toulouse · On target share 33.7 %Toulouse · Shot Frequency 2.7 shots/100 passesToulouse · Corner Pressure 4.1 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

45.7%Possession50.3%
Toulouse +4.6 pp
81.7%Pass accuracy86.1%
Toulouse +4.4 pp
62.9%Shots in the box64.7%
Toulouse +1.7 pp
34.2%On target share33.7%
Stade Brestois 29 +0.5 pp
4.2Shot Frequency2.7
Stade Brestois 29 +1.5 shots/100 passes
4.9Corner Pressure4.1
Stade Brestois 29 +0.7 corners/90

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

Stade Brestois 29 · Window 7 matches · before 23 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 7/7 · Corner Pressure 7/7 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Toulouse · Window 7 matches · before 24 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 7/7 · Corner Pressure 7/7 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

The season so far

Historical Trend

Power · 0–100

Base Power at recorded match dates. Solid lines join saved pre-match ratings; dashed segments include historical Elo backfills. The same fixed scale is used for both clubs.

Season Power historyAvailable pre-match Power observations and historical Elo backfills. Lines connect observations, not daily measurements. Exact dates and values are available in the table below. 0255075100 Stade Brestois 29 · 2026-08-22 18:45:00 UTC · 31.4 · backfill Stade Brestois 29 · 2026-08-29 18:45:00 UTC · 31.7 · backfill Stade Brestois 29 · 2026-09-05 18:45:00 UTC · 31.4 · backfill Stade Brestois 29 · 2026-09-13 18:45:00 UTC · 33 · backfill Stade Brestois 29 · 2026-09-20 13:00:00 UTC · 32.6 · backfill Stade Brestois 29 · 2026-10-10 18:45:00 UTC · 31.4 · pre Stade Brestois 29 · 2026-10-17 18:45:00 UTC · 32.9 · pre Toulouse · 2026-08-22 18:45:00 UTC · 36.8 · backfill Toulouse · 2026-08-29 18:45:00 UTC · 34.7 · backfill Toulouse · 2026-09-03 18:45:00 UTC · 35.1 · backfill Toulouse · 2026-09-12 18:45:00 UTC · 33.7 · backfill Toulouse · 2026-09-19 18:45:00 UTC · 34.1 · backfill Toulouse · 2026-10-10 18:45:00 UTC · 34.9 · pre Toulouse · 2026-10-16 18:45:00 UTC · 35.8 · pre 22 Aug 202617 Oct 2026
Stade Brestois 29Toulouse
View history data and coverage
ClubDate (UTC)PowerSource
Stade Brestois 292026-08-22 18:45:0031.4Historical Elo backfill
Stade Brestois 292026-08-29 18:45:0031.7Historical Elo backfill
Stade Brestois 292026-09-05 18:45:0031.4Historical Elo backfill
Stade Brestois 292026-09-13 18:45:0033.0Historical Elo backfill
Stade Brestois 292026-09-20 13:00:0032.6Historical Elo backfill
Stade Brestois 292026-10-10 18:45:0031.4Saved pre-match
Stade Brestois 292026-10-17 18:45:0032.9Saved pre-match
Toulouse2026-08-22 18:45:0036.8Historical Elo backfill
Toulouse2026-08-29 18:45:0034.7Historical Elo backfill
Toulouse2026-09-03 18:45:0035.1Historical Elo backfill
Toulouse2026-09-12 18:45:0033.7Historical Elo backfill
Toulouse2026-09-19 18:45:0034.1Historical Elo backfill
Toulouse2026-10-10 18:45:0034.9Saved pre-match
Toulouse2026-10-16 18:45:0035.8Saved pre-match
Chances, finishing & results

Efficiency

From chances to results. Exact values share a scale within each row; colours identify the clubs.

Last 10

Stade Brestois 29
Toulouse
ConversionGoals / shots · %
9.3% 10/10 covered
12.6% 10/10 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
71.4% 9/10 covered
66.7% 10/10 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
-0.31 7/10 covered
+0.18 7/10 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
-0.14 7/10 covered
-0.08 7/10 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
0.119 7/10 covered
0.128 7/10 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
16.1 10/10 covered
12.7 10/10 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
2.55 4/7 covered
1.80 4/7 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
1.29 4/7 covered
1.39 4/7 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
1.29 7/7 league matches
1.29 7/7 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
+0.62 5/5 Form window
+1.73 5/5 Form window

Stade Brestois 29 · Statistics before 23 Oct 2026 · Recent results D · W · L · L · W

Toulouse · Statistics before 24 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · D · W · D · L

League season

Stade Brestois 29
Toulouse
ConversionGoals / shots · %
10.8% 7/7 covered
12.6% 7/7 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
75.9% 6/7 covered
64.5% 7/7 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
-0.04 4/7 covered
-0.05 4/7 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
-0.21 4/7 covered
-0.12 4/7 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
0.131 4/7 covered
0.164 4/7 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
17.1 7/7 covered
13.6 7/7 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
2.55 4/7 covered
1.80 4/7 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
1.29 4/7 covered
1.39 4/7 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
1.29 7/7 league matches
1.29 7/7 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
+0.62 5/5 Form window
+1.73 5/5 Form window

Stade Brestois 29 · Statistics before 23 Oct 2026 · Recent results D · W · L · L · W

Toulouse · Statistics before 24 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · D · W · D · L

Positive Goals − xG means more goals scored than the observed chances predicted. Positive xGA − GA means fewer goals conceded than those chances predicted; it reflects defence and goalkeeping together. Gaps are per covered match and pair goals and xG on the same matches. Shot Quality pairs total xG and total shots. Minimum three known matches per metric; missing data stays unavailable.

Butterfly bars grow from the centre towards each club. Length shows magnitude, not superiority; negative gaps use stripes and a minus sign. Percentages use 0–100%, PPG uses 0–3; other rows share the larger absolute value as their limit. xG, xGA and PPG retain their league-season window. Points vs expected retains the latest up to five completed matches with stored pure forecasts across tracked competitions; results are newest first. These observed metrics are not adjusted for league or opponent strength.

About this comparison

Strength ratings share LOAD90’s fixed scales across leagues. Elo reflects opponent quality; Attack and Defence describe performance against the same reference club on a neutral pitch. Form adjusts for opponents and venue. League Strength is not added a second time. Cross-league ratings remain model estimates; sparse connections between leagues and incomplete data limit precision. Explore the methodology →