Nottingham Forest
— No complete reference snapshot for this forecast.
Nottingham Forest
16th · 5 pts · 5 played
WDLLD
0–1Full time
Sunderland
8th · 8 pts · 5 played
WLWDD
Nottingham Forest64.6%fair odds 1.55
Draw20.4%fair odds 4.89
Sunderland15.0%fair odds 6.67
Expected goals2.17 – 0.96total 3.12
Likeliest score2–010.3%
Everything on this tab comes from one score matrix: the LOAD90 forecast (EloLambda with attack and defence, availability, playing style and High Congestion) turned into a probability for every scoreline with the Dixon–Coles low-score correction. Fair odds are 1 ÷ probability, with no bookmaker margin. This is a probability model, not betting advice; for odds and value see eScored.
Match Opportunity
How this opponent changes expected goals compared with an average opponent from each team's domestic league.
Sunderland
— No complete reference snapshot for this forecast.
About this comparison
The same LOAD90 model is run against a virtual opponent with the league's average Elo, raw attack and defence parameters and standardised possession, with no extra absences or high congestion. Your team's strength, squad availability, congestion and the match's venue context are kept. This measures opponent opportunity, not a change in your team's form. Positive attack change is favorable; negative conceding change is favorable. Clean-sheet changes are percentage points. Values are locked at kick-off.
Score matrix
| Nottingham Forest ↓ · Sunderland → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4.9 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 | 9.1 | 9.6 | 4.4 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 2 | 10.3 | 9.9 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 3 | 7.5 | 7.1 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 4 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 5 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 6+ | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Chance of each exact score, in %. Rows are Nottingham Forest goals, columns Sunderland goals; 6+ adds up six goals or more.
Most likely scores
- 2–010.3%9.67
- 2–19.9%10.12
- 1–19.6%10.42
- 1–09.1%11.04
- 3–07.5%13.38
- 3–17.1%14.01
- 0–04.9%20.47
- 2–24.7%21.19
- 1–24.4%22.97
- 4–04.1%24.68
Winning margin
21.9%
Nottingham Forest by 3+
fair 4.56
19.6%
Nottingham Forest by 2
fair 5.10
23.0%
Nottingham Forest by 1
fair 4.35
20.4%
Draw
fair 4.89
9.9%
Sunderland by 1
fair 10.13
3.8%
Sunderland by 2
fair 26.26
1.3%
Sunderland by 3+
fair 75.55
Goal distribution
Total goals
5%0
13%1
22%2
22%3
17%4
21%5+
Nottingham Forest goals
11%0
25%1
27%2
19%3
17%4+
Sunderland goals
38%0
37%1
18%2
6%3
2%4+
LOAD90 vs pure EloLambda
| LOAD90 | EloLambda | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nottingham Forest win | 64.6% | 63.4% | +1.2 pp |
| Draw | 20.4% | 21.4% | -0.9 pp |
| Sunderland win | 15.0% | 15.3% | -0.3 pp |
| Over 2.5 | 60.4% | 57.0% | +3.3 pp |
| Both teams score | 55.0% | 52.7% | +2.2 pp |
| Expected goals Nottingham Forest | 2.17 | 2.06 | +0.11 |
| Expected goals Sunderland | 0.96 | 0.91 | +0.04 |
EloLambda is the stable eScored model without the LOAD90 factors. The change column is what playing style and High Congestion add for this match; see the methodology.
All markets model probability and fair odds
Result
- Nottingham Forest win64.6%1.55
- Draw20.4%4.89
- Sunderland win15.0%6.67
- Double chance Nottingham Forest or draw85.0%1.18
- Double chance Nottingham Forest or Sunderland79.6%1.26
- Double chance Sunderland or draw35.4%2.82
- Draw no bet Nottingham Forest81.1%1.23
- Draw no bet Sunderland18.9%5.30
Goals
- Over 0.595.1%1.05
- Over 1.582.3%1.21
- Over 2.560.4%1.66
- Over 3.538.0%2.63
- Over 4.520.6%4.86
- Under 1.517.7%5.66
- Under 2.539.6%2.52
- Under 3.562.0%1.61
Both teams to score
- Yes55.0%1.82
- No45.0%2.22
- Yes and over 2.545.4%2.20
- Nottingham Forest win and yes31.0%3.23
- Draw and yes15.6%6.43
- Sunderland win and yes8.4%11.85
Team goals
- Nottingham Forest over 0.588.6%1.13
- Nottingham Forest over 1.563.8%1.57
- Nottingham Forest over 2.536.9%2.71
- Sunderland over 0.561.5%1.63
- Sunderland over 1.524.8%4.04
- Sunderland over 2.57.2%13.84
- Nottingham Forest clean sheet38.5%2.60
- Sunderland clean sheet11.4%8.74
- Nottingham Forest win to nil33.6%2.98
- Sunderland win to nil6.6%15.25
Handicap
- Nottingham Forest −1.541.6%2.41
- Nottingham Forest −2.521.9%4.56
- Sunderland +1.558.4%1.71
- Sunderland +2.578.1%1.28
- Sunderland −1.55.1%19.49
- Nottingham Forest +1.594.9%1.05
Corners, cards and shots are not forecast by LOAD90; their actual averages are on the Overview tab.
Model track record Premier League 2025-2026
All LOAD90 forecasts before this match.
Matches scored55
Favourite won50.9%
Avg chance given to result39.3%
1X2 Brier0.608
Over 2.5 called right54.5%
BTTS called right49.1%
Calibration · when the favourite was given…
| Favourite chance | Matches | Predicted | Actually won |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30–40% | 7 | 38.0% | 42.9% |
| 40–50% | 23 | 44.2% | 47.8% |
| 50–60% | 13 | 53.6% | 30.8% |
| 60–70% | 9 | 64.5% | 88.9% |
| 70–80% | 3 | 71.9% | 66.7% |
LOAD90 vs Bookmaker
Compared on the same 25 of 55 scored matches.
| LOAD90 | Bookmaker | |
|---|---|---|
| 1X2 Brier (lower is better) | 0.6142 | 0.5804 |
| Avg chance given to result | 39.2% | 41.0% |
| Favourite won | 48.0% | 48.0% |
Bookmaker probabilities come from pre-match 1X2 odds supplied by eScored, with the margin removed. Prices may have been recorded at different times before kick-off. Bookmaker identity is unavailable for 25 archived lines; these prices may come from different bookmakers.
Latest results
- ✗Leeds 2–2 Bournemouth40·26·34
- ✗Crystal Palace 2–1 Liverpool24·25·51
- ✓Manchester City 5–1 Burnley67·20·14
- ✗Chelsea 1–3 Brighton55·23·22
- ✓Brentford 3–1 Manchester United43·26·31
- ✗Arsenal 1–1 Manchester City53·24·23
- ✗Sunderland 1–1 Aston Villa19·23·58
- ✗Bournemouth 0–0 Newcastle41·26·33
- ✓Fulham 3–1 Brentford44·26·30
- ✗Manchester United 2–1 Chelsea31·25·44
Pre-match forecasts only. 0 of 55 were published live before kick-off; the rest were rebuilt after the match from pre-match data, never using the result. Numbers are home · draw · away chances, the actual result in bold. A good model's favourites in the 60–70% row should win about 65% of the time.