Clubs Compare

SK Beveren vs Zulte Waregem

Real strength. Different football profiles.

SK Beveren

Belgian Pro League · 2026-2027

Rating as of 20 Oct 2026
Power24.5

Zulte Waregem

Belgian Pro League · 2026-2027

Rating as of 20 Oct 2026
Power29.5
The football profile

Club DNA

SK BeverenZulte Waregem

Strength Profile · Current

Fixed 0–100 ratings. Power is the Elo baseline; Attack and Defence use a common reference opponent. Form is opponent-adjusted.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability SK Beveren · Power 24.5 ptsSK Beveren · Attack 17.5 ptsSK Beveren · Defence 19.7 ptsSK Beveren · Form 24.9 pts Zulte Waregem · Power 29.5 ptsZulte Waregem · Attack 27.0 ptsZulte Waregem · Defence 30.7 ptsZulte Waregem · Form 16.7 ptsZulte Waregem · Consistency 60.2 pts Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability SK Beveren · Power 24.5 ptsSK Beveren · Attack 17.5 ptsSK Beveren · Defence 19.7 ptsSK Beveren · Form 24.9 pts Zulte Waregem · Power 29.5 ptsZulte Waregem · Attack 27.0 ptsZulte Waregem · Defence 30.7 ptsZulte Waregem · Form 16.7 ptsZulte Waregem · Consistency 60.2 pts
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

24.5Power29.5
Zulte Waregem +5.0 pts
17.5Attack27.0
Zulte Waregem +9.5 pts
19.7Defence30.7
Zulte Waregem +11.0 pts
24.9Form16.7
SK Beveren +8.2 pts
—Consistency60.2
Shared data unavailable
—Squad Availability—
Shared data unavailable

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

  • Zulte Waregem holds the defensive advantage.
  • Zulte Waregem has the stronger attacking profile.
  • SK Beveren shows better recent form.
Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

SK Beveren · Form 5/5 · Consistency 8/8 covered matches · 0 pre-match / 8 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 9 Oct 2026

Zulte Waregem · Form 5/5 · Consistency 20/20 covered matches · 0 pre-match / 20 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 10 Oct 2026

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

SK Beveren · Current gap SD 1.39 points · mean gap -0.08 · Insufficient sample

Zulte Waregem · Current gap SD 1.19 points · mean gap -0.25 · Full window

Playing Style · Current

Observed profile · last 10 matches before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 SK Beveren · Possession 51.3 %SK Beveren · Pass accuracy 81.4 %SK Beveren · Shots in the box 69.4 %SK Beveren · On target share 31.7 %SK Beveren · Shot Frequency 2.2 shots/100 passesSK Beveren · Corner Pressure 5.0 corners/90 Zulte Waregem · Possession 44.9 %Zulte Waregem · Pass accuracy 80.1 %Zulte Waregem · Shots in the box 63.5 %Zulte Waregem · On target share 35.1 %Zulte Waregem · Shot Frequency 3.4 shots/100 passesZulte Waregem · Corner Pressure 5.2 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 SK Beveren · Possession 51.3 %SK Beveren · Pass accuracy 81.4 %SK Beveren · Shots in the box 69.4 %SK Beveren · On target share 31.7 %SK Beveren · Shot Frequency 2.2 shots/100 passesSK Beveren · Corner Pressure 5.0 corners/90 Zulte Waregem · Possession 44.9 %Zulte Waregem · Pass accuracy 80.1 %Zulte Waregem · Shots in the box 63.5 %Zulte Waregem · On target share 35.1 %Zulte Waregem · Shot Frequency 3.4 shots/100 passesZulte Waregem · Corner Pressure 5.2 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

51.3%Possession44.9%
SK Beveren +6.4 pp
81.4%Pass accuracy80.1%
SK Beveren +1.3 pp
69.4%Shots in the box63.5%
SK Beveren +5.9 pp
31.7%On target share35.1%
Zulte Waregem +3.4 pp
2.2Shot Frequency3.4
Zulte Waregem +1.2 shots/100 passes
5.0Corner Pressure5.2
Zulte Waregem +0.2 corners/90

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

SK Beveren · Window 8 matches · before 24 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 8/8 · Corner Pressure 8/8 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Zulte Waregem · Window 10 matches · before 24 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 10/10 · Corner Pressure 10/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Strength Profile · Season Average

Match-sampled averages of available ratings this season, across tracked competitions. These are not time-weighted averages or a measure of consistency.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability SK Beveren · Power 26.7 ptsSK Beveren · Form 34.9 pts Zulte Waregem · Power 32.2 ptsZulte Waregem · Form 57.8 ptsZulte Waregem · Consistency 63.7 pts Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability SK Beveren · Power 26.7 ptsSK Beveren · Form 34.9 pts Zulte Waregem · Power 32.2 ptsZulte Waregem · Form 57.8 ptsZulte Waregem · Consistency 63.7 pts
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

26.7Power32.2
Zulte Waregem +5.5 pts
—Attack—
Shared data unavailable
—Defence—
Shared data unavailable
34.9Form57.8
Zulte Waregem +22.9 pts
—Consistency63.7
Shared data unavailable
—Squad Availability—
Shared data unavailable

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

  • Zulte Waregem has the higher average Form value.
  • Zulte Waregem has the higher average Power value.
Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

SK Beveren · Power 8 · Attack 0 · Defence 0 · Form 5 · Consistency 0 · Squad Availability 0 · 0 pre-match / 8 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

Zulte Waregem · Power 8 · Attack 0 · Defence 0 · Form 5 · Consistency 8 · Squad Availability 0 · 0 pre-match / 8 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

SK Beveren · Current gap SD 1.39 points · mean gap -0.08 · Insufficient sample

Zulte Waregem · Current gap SD 1.19 points · mean gap -0.25 · Full window

Playing Style · Season Average

Observed profile · league season before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 SK Beveren · Possession 51.3 %SK Beveren · Pass accuracy 81.4 %SK Beveren · Shots in the box 69.4 %SK Beveren · On target share 31.7 %SK Beveren · Shot Frequency 2.2 shots/100 passesSK Beveren · Corner Pressure 5.0 corners/90 Zulte Waregem · Possession 43.0 %Zulte Waregem · Pass accuracy 80.8 %Zulte Waregem · Shots in the box 65.1 %Zulte Waregem · On target share 33.7 %Zulte Waregem · Shot Frequency 3.4 shots/100 passesZulte Waregem · Corner Pressure 4.5 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 SK Beveren · Possession 51.3 %SK Beveren · Pass accuracy 81.4 %SK Beveren · Shots in the box 69.4 %SK Beveren · On target share 31.7 %SK Beveren · Shot Frequency 2.2 shots/100 passesSK Beveren · Corner Pressure 5.0 corners/90 Zulte Waregem · Possession 43.0 %Zulte Waregem · Pass accuracy 80.8 %Zulte Waregem · Shots in the box 65.1 %Zulte Waregem · On target share 33.7 %Zulte Waregem · Shot Frequency 3.4 shots/100 passesZulte Waregem · Corner Pressure 4.5 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

51.3%Possession43.0%
SK Beveren +8.3 pp
81.4%Pass accuracy80.8%
SK Beveren +0.6 pp
69.4%Shots in the box65.1%
SK Beveren +4.3 pp
31.7%On target share33.7%
Zulte Waregem +2.0 pp
2.2Shot Frequency3.4
Zulte Waregem +1.2 shots/100 passes
5.0Corner Pressure4.5
SK Beveren +0.5 corners/90

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

SK Beveren · Window 8 matches · before 24 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 8/8 · Corner Pressure 8/8 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Zulte Waregem · Window 8 matches · before 24 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 8/8 · Corner Pressure 8/8 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

The season so far

Historical Trend

Power · 0–100

Base Power at recorded match dates. Solid lines join saved pre-match ratings; dashed segments include historical Elo backfills. The same fixed scale is used for both clubs.

Season Power historyAvailable pre-match Power observations and historical Elo backfills. Lines connect observations, not daily measurements. Exact dates and values are available in the table below. 0255075100 SK Beveren · 2026-08-09 17:15:00 UTC · 27.4 · backfill SK Beveren · 2026-08-16 11:30:00 UTC · 26.5 · backfill SK Beveren · 2026-08-22 14:00:00 UTC · 27.9 · backfill SK Beveren · 2026-08-28 18:45:00 UTC · 26.1 · backfill SK Beveren · 2026-09-06 17:15:00 UTC · 25 · backfill SK Beveren · 2026-09-12 14:00:00 UTC · 26.2 · backfill SK Beveren · 2026-09-20 17:15:00 UTC · 28.1 · backfill SK Beveren · 2026-10-09 18:45:00 UTC · 26.5 · backfill Zulte Waregem · 2026-08-09 14:00:00 UTC · 29.1 · backfill Zulte Waregem · 2026-08-15 14:00:00 UTC · 30.4 · backfill Zulte Waregem · 2026-08-22 14:00:00 UTC · 31.5 · backfill Zulte Waregem · 2026-08-30 17:15:00 UTC · 33.4 · backfill Zulte Waregem · 2026-09-06 14:00:00 UTC · 33.5 · backfill Zulte Waregem · 2026-09-13 16:30:00 UTC · 35 · backfill Zulte Waregem · 2026-09-19 18:45:00 UTC · 33.1 · backfill Zulte Waregem · 2026-10-10 18:45:00 UTC · 31.6 · backfill 9 Aug 202610 Oct 2026
SK BeverenZulte Waregem
View history data and coverage
ClubDate (UTC)PowerSource
SK Beveren2026-08-09 17:15:0027.4Historical Elo backfill
SK Beveren2026-08-16 11:30:0026.5Historical Elo backfill
SK Beveren2026-08-22 14:00:0027.9Historical Elo backfill
SK Beveren2026-08-28 18:45:0026.1Historical Elo backfill
SK Beveren2026-09-06 17:15:0025.0Historical Elo backfill
SK Beveren2026-09-12 14:00:0026.2Historical Elo backfill
SK Beveren2026-09-20 17:15:0028.1Historical Elo backfill
SK Beveren2026-10-09 18:45:0026.5Historical Elo backfill
Zulte Waregem2026-08-09 14:00:0029.1Historical Elo backfill
Zulte Waregem2026-08-15 14:00:0030.4Historical Elo backfill
Zulte Waregem2026-08-22 14:00:0031.5Historical Elo backfill
Zulte Waregem2026-08-30 17:15:0033.4Historical Elo backfill
Zulte Waregem2026-09-06 14:00:0033.5Historical Elo backfill
Zulte Waregem2026-09-13 16:30:0035.0Historical Elo backfill
Zulte Waregem2026-09-19 18:45:0033.1Historical Elo backfill
Zulte Waregem2026-10-10 18:45:0031.6Historical Elo backfill
Chances, finishing & results

Efficiency

From chances to results. Exact values share a scale within each row; colours identify the clubs.

Last 10

SK Beveren
Zulte Waregem
ConversionGoals / shots · %
9.8% 8/8 covered
11.5% 10/10 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
61.1% 6/8 covered
72.0% 10/10 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
-0.13 5/8 covered
+0.51 7/10 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
-0.51 5/8 covered
+0.14 7/10 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
0.072 5/8 covered
0.099 7/10 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
10.3 8/8 covered
13.1 10/10 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
0.73 5/8 covered
1.25 5/8 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
2.09 5/8 covered
1.17 5/8 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
1.13 8/8 league matches
1.38 8/8 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
-0.40 5/5 Form window
-3.50 5/5 Form window

SK Beveren · Statistics before 24 Oct 2026 · Recent results L · L · W · W · L

Zulte Waregem · Statistics before 24 Oct 2026 · Recent results L · L · L · W · D

League season

SK Beveren
Zulte Waregem
ConversionGoals / shots · %
9.8% 8/8 covered
9.9% 8/8 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
61.1% 6/8 covered
74.4% 8/8 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
-0.13 5/8 covered
+0.35 5/8 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
-0.51 5/8 covered
+0.17 5/8 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
0.072 5/8 covered
0.096 5/8 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
10.3 8/8 covered
12.6 8/8 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
0.73 5/8 covered
1.25 5/8 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
2.09 5/8 covered
1.17 5/8 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
1.13 8/8 league matches
1.38 8/8 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
-0.40 5/5 Form window
-3.50 5/5 Form window

SK Beveren · Statistics before 24 Oct 2026 · Recent results L · L · W · W · L

Zulte Waregem · Statistics before 24 Oct 2026 · Recent results L · L · L · W · D

Positive Goals − xG means more goals scored than the observed chances predicted. Positive xGA − GA means fewer goals conceded than those chances predicted; it reflects defence and goalkeeping together. Gaps are per covered match and pair goals and xG on the same matches. Shot Quality pairs total xG and total shots. Minimum three known matches per metric; missing data stays unavailable.

Butterfly bars grow from the centre towards each club. Length shows magnitude, not superiority; negative gaps use stripes and a minus sign. Percentages use 0–100%, PPG uses 0–3; other rows share the larger absolute value as their limit. xG, xGA and PPG retain their league-season window. Points vs expected retains the latest up to five completed matches with stored pure forecasts across tracked competitions; results are newest first. These observed metrics are not adjusted for league or opponent strength.

About this comparison

Strength ratings share LOAD90’s fixed scales across leagues. Elo reflects opponent quality; Attack and Defence describe performance against the same reference club on a neutral pitch. Form adjusts for opponents and venue. League Strength is not added a second time. Cross-league ratings remain model estimates; sparse connections between leagues and incomplete data limit precision. Explore the methodology →