L90 Strength L90 Strength is LOAD90’s own club strength rating on a fixed 0–100 scale, built from its Elo rating. League Strength uses the mean Elo of a league's clubs and a separate league calibration, so the two scores are not directly comparable.
+3.6 is current form. We look at the goals the team scores and concedes and at the quality of its chances (expected goals, xG) over recent matches. If attack and defence are playing above what the Elo rating predicts, L90 Strength goes up for the forecast; if below, it goes down.
Base L90 Strength changed -3.0 over the last 5 matches; that is already inside the number. 62.7+3.6
+3.6 is current form. We look at the goals the team scores and concedes and at the quality of its chances (expected goals, xG) over recent matches. If attack and defence are playing above what the Elo rating predicts, L90 Strength goes up for the forecast; if below, it goes down.
Base L90 Strength changed -3.0 over the last 5 matches; that is already inside the number. 62.7+3.6
World Rank
48th
Global, by Elo
Serie A Rank
6th
L90 Strength
A solid mid-table side.
Napoli build on a top-third defence and back it with a top-third attack. Across the 7 league matches with forecasts, their points total is close to our pre-match expectations. A. Buongiorno is out, and The toughest of the next 5 matches is the trip to FC Porto, in a congested stretch.
Home is where they earn their points: 2.0 per game there against 1.0 away.
- Top 4 20% · Relegation 0%Likely 6th · 64 projected points
-
Next 5: about 7 of 15 points Toughest at
FC Porto · , 22% to win · congested stretch
- 1 key player outA. Buongiorno · 11% of squad weight missing
- 10 pts vs 11.7 expected-1.7 vs pre-match expectations · 7 matches with forecasts
Key insights
Automatic descriptive highlights for Napoli. Each metric is ordered within its own type; types alternate to keep the selection varied. Up to six distinct signals for this club in each category.Result statistics require at least five known completed matches. They use the last ten recorded results across all competitions, or the last eight away results. Future, special and invalid results are excluded; missing results can interrupt real-world sequences, so streaks refer to recorded results. 10+ means at least ten within the window.
Bars run oldest to newest. Height shows goals scored, or goals conceded in conceding cards, on the same 0–6 scale. Six or more goals use maximum height; zero retains a small marker. Colour shows the result: teal = win, amber = draw, red = loss. In event and streak cards, solid bars mark the event and faded bars mark its absence. Hover for the date, full score and event. xG and points cards compare their two inputs, not a fabricated history.
xG Difference uses observed Playing style averages; window size is not xG coverage and the two metrics can have different denominators. Points minus xPts uses the same covered current-league matches and stored forecasts as Club strength, including labelled historical reconstructions.
Headlines
-
Insight
Napoli
+1.02
xG difference per match
Underlying performance · 10-match window
xG for1.81xG against0.79
-
Insight
Napoli
3
Clean sheets
Last 9 recorded matches · all competitions
Goals scored · W/D/L colours
Solid = Clean sheet -
Alert
Napoli
1.6
Goals conceded away per match
Last 5 recorded away matches
Goals conceded · W/D/L colours
-
Insight
Napoli
−1.7
Points below expected
7/7 covered matches · current leagues
Points10.0xPts11.7
Defence
Streaks
Not enough recorded data for this category yet.
The full picture, with the evidence behind every signal.View all Club insights →
Season
League position and season results.
Overview
2026-2027Serie AView table →
Position
9th/ 20
Points
101.43 PPG
Played
7
League gap
9pts behind leader
42.9%Win %
Wins3
Draws1
Losses3
Expected metrics · 6 of 7 matches covered
Goals For
101.43 / game
xG
10.75
2.75 fewer goals than expected.
vs 8 goals
Goals Against
71.00 / game
xGA
4.59
0.59 fewer conceded than expected.
vs 4 conceded
Goal Difference
+3+0.43 / game
xGD
+6.16
Goal difference is 2.16 lower than expected.
vs +4 GD
Clean Sheets
343% of games
UEFA Champions League · League phaseView table →
Position
32nd/ 36
Points
00.00 PPG
Played
2
League gap
6pts behind leader
0.0%Win %
Wins0
Draws0
Losses2
Expected metrics · 1 of 2 matches covered
Goals For
10.50 / game
xG
1.94
0.94 fewer goals than expected.
vs 1 goals
Goals Against
42.00 / game
xGA
1.38
1.62 more conceded than expected.
vs 3 conceded
Goal Difference
-3-1.50 / game
xGD
+0.56
Goal difference is 2.56 lower than expected.
vs -2 GD
Clean Sheets
00% of games
All competitions9 Played
33.3%Win %
Wins3
Draws1
Losses5
Expected metrics · 7 of 9 matches covered
Goals For
111.22 / game
xG
12.69
3.69 fewer goals than expected.
vs 9 goals
Goals Against
111.22 / game
xGA
5.97
1.03 more conceded than expected.
vs 7 conceded
Goal Difference
+0+0.00 / game
xGD
+6.72
Goal difference is 4.72 lower than expected.
vs +2 GD
Clean Sheets
333% of games
Season totals cover all competitions and stages. Positions and points refer to each competition table.
League standings
Serie A · 2026-2027
Swipe to explore the league table →
| # | Club | Rating | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1– |  Inter |
84 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | +12 | 19 | WWDWW |
| 2– |  Lazio |
62 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | +10 | 19 | WDWWW |
| 3– |  AS Roma |
74 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | +13 | 17 | WWDDW |
| 4▲ |  AC Milan |
66 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | +7 | 15 | DDWDW |
| 5▲ |  Como |
67 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | +5 | 14 | WWLDW |
| 6▲ |  Frosinone |
30 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | +4 | 13 | WDWLW |
| 7▼ |  Cagliari |
33 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 13 | WWWDL |
| 8▼ |  Juventus |
67 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | +1 | 11 | DLWDL |
| 9▼ | Napoli |
63 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | +3 | 10 | LWDWL |
| 10▲ |  Torino |
39 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | +1 | 10 | WLDWW |
| 11▼ |  Atalanta |
59 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -1 | 9 | LLLWL |
| 12▲ |  Lecce |
28 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -3 | 9 | LWLLW |
| 13▼ |  Sassuolo |
33 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -2 | 8 | DWLDL |
| 14▲ |  Monza |
18 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -2 | 7 | DLWLW |
| 15▼ |  Bologna |
47 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -4 | 5 | DLDWL |
| 16▼ |  Udinese |
32 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -7 | 4 | LLLLL |
| 17– |  Genoa |
29 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -8 | 4 | LDLWL |
| 18▲ |  Fiorentina |
39 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -9 | 4 | LWDLL |
| 19▼ |  Parma |
28 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -9 | 4 | DLWLL |
| 20– |  Venezia |
15 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -10 | 3 | LLLLW |
20 clubs · ▲ Up · ▼ Down · – Unchanged · Since the start of the latest played matchweek.
League position over time
Position by matchweek
Higher is better. One point per matchweek; partial rounds are marked. Postponed games count when played. Hover, tap or focus a point for details.
View position history
| MW | Results through (UTC) | Position | Pts | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 Aug 2026 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| 2 | 31 Aug 2026 | 10 | 3 | 2 |
| 3 | 7 Sep 2026 | 12 | 3 | 3 |
| 4 | 14 Sep 2026 | 10 | 6 | 4 |
| 5 | 20 Sep 2026 | 9 | 7 | 5 |
| 6 | 12 Oct 2026 | 8 | 10 | 6 |
| 7 | 19 Oct 2026 | 9 | 10 | 7 |
League phase standings
UEFA Champions League · 2026-2027
Swipe to explore the league table →
| # | Club | Rating | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1– |  Paris Saint Germain |
90 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +7 | 6 | WW |
| 2▲ |  Aston Villa |
84 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +7 | 6 | WW |
| 3– |  Barcelona |
93 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +7 | 6 | WW |
| 4▲ |  VfB Stuttgart |
68 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +5 | 6 | WW |
| 5▲ |  Liverpool |
84 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +4 | 6 | WW |
| 6– |  Sporting CP |
84 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +4 | 6 | WW |
| 7▲ |  Arsenal |
94 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +4 | 6 | WW |
| 8▲ |  Real Betis |
72 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 6 | WW |
| 9▲ |  Real Madrid |
89 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 6 | WW |
| 10▼ |  Bayern München |
94 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +5 | 4 | WD |
| 11▲ |  Shakhtar Donetsk |
58 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 4 | DW |
| 12▼ | Como |
67 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 3 | WL |
| 13▼ |  Manchester United |
79 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 3 | WL |
| 14▲ |  Villarreal |
67 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 3 | LW |
| 15▲ |  Atletico Madrid |
81 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 3 | LW |
| 16▲ |  Club Brugge KV |
76 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +0 | 3 | LW |
| 17▼ |  Manchester City |
91 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +0 | 3 | WL |
| 18▼ |  Borussia Dortmund |
81 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +0 | 3 | WL |
| 19▼ |  Lens |
58 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 3 | WL |
| 20▼ |  AEK Athens FC |
53 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 3 | WL |
| 21▲ |  RB Leipzig |
68 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 3 | LW |
| 22▲ |  Sabah FA |
26 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 3 | LW |
| 23▲ |  Feyenoord |
61 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 3 | LW |
| 24▲ |  Bodo/Glimt |
60 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -4 | 3 | LW |
| 25▼ | AS Roma |
74 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | DL |
| 26▼ |  PSV Eindhoven |
74 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | DL |
| 27▲ |  Viking |
16 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 1 | LD |
| 28▼ |  Fenerbahce |
64 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -6 | 1 | DL |
| 29▼ | Inter |
84 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | LL |
| 30▲ | FC Porto |
80 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -3 | 0 | LL |
| 31▼ |  Slavia Praha |
40 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -3 | 0 | LL |
| 32▼ | Napoli |
63 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -3 | 0 | LL |
| 33▼ |  Lask Linz |
39 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 0 | LL |
| 34▼ |  Lille |
56 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 0 | LL |
| 35▼ |  Galatasaray |
64 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -5 | 0 | LL |
| 36▼ |  Slovan Bratislava |
20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -8 | 0 | LL |
36 clubs · ▲ Up · ▼ Down · – Unchanged · Since the start of the latest played matchday.
League position over time
Position by matchday
Higher is better. One point per matchday; partial rounds are marked. Postponed games count when played. Hover, tap or focus a point for details.
View position history
| MD | Results through (UTC) | Position | Pts | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 Sep 2026 | 28 | 0 | 1 |
| 2 | 14 Oct 2026 | 32 | 0 | 2 |
Competition standings
There is no combined table across competitions. View each competition separately.
Squad 27 players · this season, all competitions · 5 out
Top scorer
K. De Bruyne3 goals (1 pen)
K. De Bruyne3 goals (1 pen)
Most assists
G. Di Lorenzo1 assists
G. Di Lorenzo1 assists
Best rated
A. Rrahmani7.26 avg rating
A. Rrahmani7.26 avg rating
Most minutes
G. Di Lorenzo810 min
G. Di Lorenzo810 min
Key to the model
R. HøjlundStarter · weight 1.78
R. HøjlundStarter · weight 1.78| Player | Age | Apps | Min | G | A | Rating | Model role |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goalkeepers | |||||||
 A. Meret |
29 | 6 (6) | 496 | 0 | 0 | 6.84 | rotation |
 V. Milinković-Savić |
29 | 4 (3) | 314 | 0 | 0 | 6.66 | starter |
 N. Contini |
30 | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | depth |
| Defenders | |||||||
| G. Di Lorenzo |
33 | 9 (9) | 810 | 0 | 1 | 6.47 | starter |
| A. Rrahmani |
32 | 9 (9) | 810 | 1 | 1 | 7.26 | starter |
 Rafa Marín |
24 | 8 (8) | 693 | 0 | 0 | 6.83 | starter |
 L. Spinazzola |
33 | 7 (5) | 497 | 0 | 0 | 6.68 | rotation |
 B. Badiashile |
25 | 4 (3) | 280 | 0 | 0 | 6.71 | rotation |
 M. Olivera |
28 | 6 (3) | 255 | 0 | 0 | 6.80 | rotation |
 S. Beukema |
27 | 1 (1) | 63 | 0 | 0 | 7.26 | rotation |
 A. Buongiorno injured |
27 | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | starter |
 L. Marianucci injured |
22 | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | depth |
| Midfielders | |||||||
 S. Lobotka |
31 | 9 (8) | 695 | 1 | 0 | 6.94 | starter |
| K. De Bruyne |
35 | 9 (5) | 569 | 3 | 1 | 6.93 | rotation |
 B. Gilmour |
25 | 7 (5) | 426 | 1 | 0 | 6.81 | rotation |
 S. McTominay |
29 | 5 (4) | 325 | 0 | 0 | 6.62 | starter |
 F. Anguissa |
30 | 4 (3) | 237 | 0 | 0 | 6.14 | rotation |
 A. Vergara injured |
23 | 4 (2) | 163 | 1 | 1 | 6.57 | rotation |
 C. Favasuli injured |
22 | 3 (0) | 93 | 0 | 1 | 6.77 | rotation |
 F. Barido |
— | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Forwards | |||||||
| R. Højlund |
23 | 9 (8) | 626 | 2 | 0 | 6.48 | starter |
 M. Politano |
33 | 9 (7) | 493 | 1 | 1 | 6.76 | starter |
 N. Lang |
27 | 6 (3) | 284 | 1 | 0 | 6.86 | rotation |
 Alisson Santos |
24 | 5 (3) | 274 | 0 | 0 | 6.53 | starter |
 L. Lucca |
26 | 9 (1) | 201 | 0 | 0 | 6.48 | rotation |
 David Neres injured |
29 | 6 (1) | 174 | 0 | 0 | 6.50 | rotation |
 Giovane |
22 | 3 (2) | 132 | 0 | 1 | 6.36 | rotation |
Stats are this season in all competitions. Model role is how much the availability model weighs each player before the game with Bodo/Glimt: core, starter, rotation or depth, from several seasons of minutes and ratings.
Performance
Strength, recent form and playing style.
Strength Serie A · 20 clubs
L90 Strength6th of 20
63
Elo 1724 · World #48
Current Strength
61
With absences before 20 Oct: -11 Elo
Attack5th of 20
61
Scores 1.71 per match against an average top-five side
Defence4th of 20
70
Concedes 1.26 per match against an average top-five side
In forecast League average
L90 Strength comes from Elo; Attack and Defence from goals scored and conceded, expected goals (xG) and shots on target, all on fixed 0–100 scales shared by every league. These are the numbers the forecast uses.
Form last 5 for the index · last 9 listed
44
WDWLL Form index · 10th of 20 in league
- Points, last 5
- 7
- Median top-5 club
- 7.7
- Own forecasts
- 8.7 -1.7
Table9th
L90 Strength6th
Form10th
Lower in the table than their strength suggests.
Form compares points with what a median top-five club (L90 Strength 50) would take from the same fixtures, so wins over strong sides count for more; 50 is a typical run. "Own forecasts" is the gap to this club's pre-match expectations. Form is context: in our tests it did not improve the forecast.
- L17 OctA · Venezia0–12.3 xPts
- L13 OctA · Villarreal1–31.1 xPts
- W10 OctH · Frosinone3–02.1 xPts
- D20 SepA · Fiorentina1–11.6 xPts
- W13 SepH · Bologna1–01.7 xPts
- L9 SepH · Arsenal0–10.7 xPts
- L5 SepA · Inter2–30.8 xPts
- L30 AugH · Como1–21.6 xPts
- W22 AugA · Genoa2–01.7 xPts
Trends last 9, all competitions
Scored
7/9
Clean sheet
3/9
Conceded 2+
3/9
Over 2.5
4/9
Both teams scored
4/9
Playing style vs Serie A average
NAPLeagueRank
Goals scored
1.43
1.47
9th
Goals conceded
1.00
1.48
3rd
xG
1.79
1.47
6th
xG allowed
0.77
1.48
2nd
Scored in
86%
78%
6th
Clean sheets
43%
21%
3rd
NAPLeagueRank
Shots
16.71
14.36
5th
Shots on target
5.43
4.90
7th
On target share
33%
34%
14th
Box share
70%
64%
4th
Conversion
9%
10%
12th
NAPLeagueRank
Shots allowed
15.57
14.48
13th
On target allowed
3.86
4.92
5th
Blocks
4.40
3.76
8th
Save rate
74%
70%
7th
NAPLeagueRank
Possession
53%
50%
7th
Passes
510
459
6th
Pass accuracy
87%
85%
7th
NAPLeagueRank
Fouls
8.57
10.66
4th
Fouls suffered
8.86
10.73
16th
Yellow cards
0.86
1.64
2nd
Red cards
0.00
0.02
1st
NAPLeagueRank
Goals scored
1.20
1.45
13th
Goals conceded
1.10
1.50
3rd
xG
1.81
1.45
5th
xG allowed
0.79
1.46
2nd
Scored in
80%
75%
7th
Clean sheets
40%
21%
2nd
NAPLeagueRank
Shots
14.70
13.78
7th
Shots on target
5.00
4.77
8th
On target share
34%
34%
11th
Box share
67%
64%
8th
Conversion
8%
10%
15th
NAPLeagueRank
Shots allowed
16.20
14.16
15th
On target allowed
4.20
4.83
6th
Blocks
5.13
3.64
2nd
Save rate
69%
70%
10th
NAPLeagueRank
Possession
53%
50%
6th
Passes
516
453
6th
Pass accuracy
87%
85%
6th
NAPLeagueRank
Fouls
9.00
10.85
2nd
Fouls suffered
9.40
10.97
16th
Yellow cards
1.10
1.63
1st
Red cards
0.00
0.04
1st
Home and away this league season
Home2.00pts per game2-0-1 · 1.7–0.7 goals · 3 games
Away1.00pts per game1-1-2 · 1.2–1.2 goals · 4 games
Goal timing this league season · 7 games
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
3
46-60
1
61-75
3
2
76-90
scored conceded, per 15 minutes
In forecastVia Att/DefContextLeague average
Possession adjusts the LOAD90 forecast directly. Goals, xG and shots on target feed the Attack and Defence ratings. The rest describes how the team plays and does not change the forecast.
Team rankings Serie A · 7 games · rank of 20
Attack
GF
10
9th / 20
GF/G
1.43
9th / 20
xG/G
1.79
6th / 20
G − xG
-0.36
18th / 20
Defence
GA
7
3rd / 20
GA/G
1.00
3rd / 20
xGA/G
0.77
2nd / 20
xGA − GA
-0.23
14th / 20
Overall
Pts
10
9th / 20
xPts
11.7
6th / 20
PPG
1.43
9th / 20
TR
6.88
7th / 20
GD
+3
7th / 20
xGD
+7.1
3rd / 20
W
3
8th / 20
L
3
9th / 20
Scorelines
- 2–0×1
- 1–2×1
- 2–3×1
- 1–0×1
- 1–1×1
- 3–0×1
Goals per game both teams
0%
0
29%
1
29%
2
29%
3
0%
4
14%
5+
Totals club · league
- Over 1.5
- 71%84%
- Over 2.5
- 43%60%
- Over 3.5
- 14%30%
- Both scored
- 43%57%
- Clean sheet
- 43%22%
- Failed to score
- 14%22%
ClubLeague average
This league season only. xPts adds up our pre-match win and draw chances (pure EloLambda, the same numbers as Form). xG and TR come from match data and describe the season so far; none of these rankings change the forecast directly.