Clubs Compare

KVC Westerlo vs Union St. Gilloise

Real strength. Different football profiles.

KVC Westerlo

Belgian Pro League · 2026-2027

Rating as of 20 Oct 2026
Power32.5
The football profile

Club DNA

KVC WesterloUnion St. Gilloise

Strength Profile · Current

Fixed 0–100 ratings. Power is the Elo baseline; Attack and Defence use a common reference opponent. Form is opponent-adjusted.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability KVC Westerlo · Power 32.5 ptsKVC Westerlo · Attack 41.5 ptsKVC Westerlo · Defence 32.2 ptsKVC Westerlo · Form 82.9 ptsKVC Westerlo · Consistency 56.9 pts Union St. Gilloise · Power 69.9 ptsUnion St. Gilloise · Attack 62.1 ptsUnion St. Gilloise · Defence 74.1 ptsUnion St. Gilloise · Form 73.1 ptsUnion St. Gilloise · Consistency 64.7 ptsUnion St. Gilloise · Squad Availability 57.3 % Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability KVC Westerlo · Power 32.5 ptsKVC Westerlo · Attack 41.5 ptsKVC Westerlo · Defence 32.2 ptsKVC Westerlo · Form 82.9 ptsKVC Westerlo · Consistency 56.9 pts Union St. Gilloise · Power 69.9 ptsUnion St. Gilloise · Attack 62.1 ptsUnion St. Gilloise · Defence 74.1 ptsUnion St. Gilloise · Form 73.1 ptsUnion St. Gilloise · Consistency 64.7 ptsUnion St. Gilloise · Squad Availability 57.3 %
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

32.5Power69.9
Union St. Gilloise +37.4 pts
41.5Attack62.1
Union St. Gilloise +20.6 pts
32.2Defence74.1
Union St. Gilloise +41.9 pts
82.9Form73.1
KVC Westerlo +9.8 pts
56.9Consistency64.7
Union St. Gilloise +7.8 pts
—Squad Availability57.3%
Shared data unavailable

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

  • Union St. Gilloise holds the defensive advantage.
  • Union St. Gilloise has the higher Power rating.
  • Union St. Gilloise has the stronger attacking profile.
Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

KVC Westerlo · Form 5/5 · Consistency 20/20 covered matches · 0 pre-match / 20 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 11 Oct 2026

Union St. Gilloise · Form 5/5 · Consistency 20/20 covered matches · 1 pre-match / 19 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 15 Oct 2026

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

KVC Westerlo · Current gap SD 1.29 points · mean gap 0.41 · Full window

Union St. Gilloise · Current gap SD 1.06 points · mean gap 0.53 · Full window

Playing Style · Current

Observed profile · last 10 matches before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 KVC Westerlo · Possession 52.1 %KVC Westerlo · Pass accuracy 83.7 %KVC Westerlo · Shots in the box 67.9 %KVC Westerlo · On target share 32.0 %KVC Westerlo · Shot Frequency 3.3 shots/100 passesKVC Westerlo · Corner Pressure 3.9 corners/90 Union St. Gilloise · Possession 50.6 %Union St. Gilloise · Pass accuracy 82.3 %Union St. Gilloise · Shots in the box 75.3 %Union St. Gilloise · On target share 40.5 %Union St. Gilloise · Shot Frequency 3.7 shots/100 passesUnion St. Gilloise · Corner Pressure 5.2 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 KVC Westerlo · Possession 52.1 %KVC Westerlo · Pass accuracy 83.7 %KVC Westerlo · Shots in the box 67.9 %KVC Westerlo · On target share 32.0 %KVC Westerlo · Shot Frequency 3.3 shots/100 passesKVC Westerlo · Corner Pressure 3.9 corners/90 Union St. Gilloise · Possession 50.6 %Union St. Gilloise · Pass accuracy 82.3 %Union St. Gilloise · Shots in the box 75.3 %Union St. Gilloise · On target share 40.5 %Union St. Gilloise · Shot Frequency 3.7 shots/100 passesUnion St. Gilloise · Corner Pressure 5.2 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

52.1%Possession50.6%
KVC Westerlo +1.5 pp
83.7%Pass accuracy82.3%
KVC Westerlo +1.4 pp
67.9%Shots in the box75.3%
Union St. Gilloise +7.3 pp
32.0%On target share40.5%
Union St. Gilloise +8.5 pp
3.3Shot Frequency3.7
Union St. Gilloise +0.4 shots/100 passes
3.9Corner Pressure5.2
Union St. Gilloise +1.3 corners/90

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

KVC Westerlo · Window 10 matches · before 24 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 10/10 · Corner Pressure 10/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Union St. Gilloise · Window 10 matches · before 25 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 9/10 · Corner Pressure 9/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Strength Profile · Season Average

Match-sampled averages of available ratings this season, across tracked competitions. These are not time-weighted averages or a measure of consistency.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability KVC Westerlo · Power 25.6 ptsKVC Westerlo · Form 32.7 ptsKVC Westerlo · Consistency 58.8 pts Union St. Gilloise · Power 66.9 ptsUnion St. Gilloise · Form 84.0 ptsUnion St. Gilloise · Consistency 66.2 pts Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability KVC Westerlo · Power 25.6 ptsKVC Westerlo · Form 32.7 ptsKVC Westerlo · Consistency 58.8 pts Union St. Gilloise · Power 66.9 ptsUnion St. Gilloise · Form 84.0 ptsUnion St. Gilloise · Consistency 66.2 pts
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

25.6Power66.9
Union St. Gilloise +41.3 pts
—Attack—
Shared data unavailable
—Defence—
Shared data unavailable
32.7Form84.0
Union St. Gilloise +51.3 pts
58.8Consistency66.2
Union St. Gilloise +7.4 pts
—Squad Availability—
Shared data unavailable

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

  • Union St. Gilloise has the higher average Form value.
  • Union St. Gilloise has the higher average Power value.
  • Union St. Gilloise has the higher average Consistency value.
Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

KVC Westerlo · Power 8 · Attack 0 · Defence 0 · Form 5 · Consistency 8 · Squad Availability 0 · 0 pre-match / 8 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

Union St. Gilloise · Power 10 · Attack 1 · Defence 1 · Form 7 · Consistency 10 · Squad Availability 1 · 1 pre-match / 9 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

KVC Westerlo · Current gap SD 1.29 points · mean gap 0.41 · Full window

Union St. Gilloise · Current gap SD 1.06 points · mean gap 0.53 · Full window

Playing Style · Season Average

Observed profile · league season before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 KVC Westerlo · Possession 50.8 %KVC Westerlo · Pass accuracy 83.2 %KVC Westerlo · Shots in the box 71.6 %KVC Westerlo · On target share 36.1 %KVC Westerlo · Shot Frequency 3.3 shots/100 passesKVC Westerlo · Corner Pressure 3.5 corners/90 Union St. Gilloise · Possession 53.3 %Union St. Gilloise · Pass accuracy 82.2 %Union St. Gilloise · Shots in the box 78.3 %Union St. Gilloise · On target share 42.2 %Union St. Gilloise · Shot Frequency 3.7 shots/100 passesUnion St. Gilloise · Corner Pressure 5.9 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 KVC Westerlo · Possession 50.8 %KVC Westerlo · Pass accuracy 83.2 %KVC Westerlo · Shots in the box 71.6 %KVC Westerlo · On target share 36.1 %KVC Westerlo · Shot Frequency 3.3 shots/100 passesKVC Westerlo · Corner Pressure 3.5 corners/90 Union St. Gilloise · Possession 53.3 %Union St. Gilloise · Pass accuracy 82.2 %Union St. Gilloise · Shots in the box 78.3 %Union St. Gilloise · On target share 42.2 %Union St. Gilloise · Shot Frequency 3.7 shots/100 passesUnion St. Gilloise · Corner Pressure 5.9 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

50.8%Possession53.3%
Union St. Gilloise +2.5 pp
83.2%Pass accuracy82.2%
KVC Westerlo +1.0 pp
71.6%Shots in the box78.3%
Union St. Gilloise +6.7 pp
36.1%On target share42.2%
Union St. Gilloise +6.1 pp
3.3Shot Frequency3.7
Union St. Gilloise +0.4 shots/100 passes
3.5Corner Pressure5.9
Union St. Gilloise +2.4 corners/90

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

KVC Westerlo · Window 8 matches · before 24 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 8/8 · Corner Pressure 8/8 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Union St. Gilloise · Window 8 matches · before 25 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 8/8 · Corner Pressure 8/8 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

The season so far

Historical Trend

Power · 0–100

Base Power at recorded match dates. Solid lines join saved pre-match ratings; dashed segments include historical Elo backfills. The same fixed scale is used for both clubs.

Season Power historyAvailable pre-match Power observations and historical Elo backfills. Lines connect observations, not daily measurements. Exact dates and values are available in the table below. 0255075100 KVC Westerlo · 2026-08-08 18:45:00 UTC · 26.2 · backfill KVC Westerlo · 2026-08-15 18:45:00 UTC · 24.6 · backfill KVC Westerlo · 2026-08-23 14:00:00 UTC · 24 · backfill KVC Westerlo · 2026-08-30 17:15:00 UTC · 22.7 · backfill KVC Westerlo · 2026-09-05 16:15:00 UTC · 22.7 · backfill KVC Westerlo · 2026-09-12 16:15:00 UTC · 26 · backfill KVC Westerlo · 2026-09-20 14:00:00 UTC · 27.7 · backfill KVC Westerlo · 2026-10-11 16:30:00 UTC · 30.6 · backfill Union St. Gilloise · 2026-08-08 18:45:00 UTC · 63.3 · backfill Union St. Gilloise · 2026-08-15 14:00:00 UTC · 63.8 · backfill Union St. Gilloise · 2026-08-30 16:30:00 UTC · 62.7 · backfill Union St. Gilloise · 2026-09-02 18:30:00 UTC · 63.8 · backfill Union St. Gilloise · 2026-09-05 14:00:00 UTC · 66.3 · backfill Union St. Gilloise · 2026-09-12 18:45:00 UTC · 67.3 · backfill Union St. Gilloise · 2026-09-17 19:00:00 UTC · 68.4 · backfill Union St. Gilloise · 2026-09-20 11:30:00 UTC · 70.8 · backfill Union St. Gilloise · 2026-10-11 14:00:00 UTC · 71.8 · backfill Union St. Gilloise · 2026-10-15 16:45:00 UTC · 70.7 · pre 8 Aug 202615 Oct 2026
KVC WesterloUnion St. Gilloise
View history data and coverage
ClubDate (UTC)PowerSource
KVC Westerlo2026-08-08 18:45:0026.2Historical Elo backfill
KVC Westerlo2026-08-15 18:45:0024.6Historical Elo backfill
KVC Westerlo2026-08-23 14:00:0024.0Historical Elo backfill
KVC Westerlo2026-08-30 17:15:0022.7Historical Elo backfill
KVC Westerlo2026-09-05 16:15:0022.7Historical Elo backfill
KVC Westerlo2026-09-12 16:15:0026.0Historical Elo backfill
KVC Westerlo2026-09-20 14:00:0027.7Historical Elo backfill
KVC Westerlo2026-10-11 16:30:0030.6Historical Elo backfill
Union St. Gilloise2026-08-08 18:45:0063.3Historical Elo backfill
Union St. Gilloise2026-08-15 14:00:0063.8Historical Elo backfill
Union St. Gilloise2026-08-30 16:30:0062.7Historical Elo backfill
Union St. Gilloise2026-09-02 18:30:0063.8Historical Elo backfill
Union St. Gilloise2026-09-05 14:00:0066.3Historical Elo backfill
Union St. Gilloise2026-09-12 18:45:0067.3Historical Elo backfill
Union St. Gilloise2026-09-17 19:00:0068.4Historical Elo backfill
Union St. Gilloise2026-09-20 11:30:0070.8Historical Elo backfill
Union St. Gilloise2026-10-11 14:00:0071.8Historical Elo backfill
Union St. Gilloise2026-10-15 16:45:0070.7Saved pre-match
Chances, finishing & results

Efficiency

From chances to results. Exact values share a scale within each row; colours identify the clubs.

Last 10

KVC Westerlo
Union St. Gilloise
ConversionGoals / shots · %
14.0% 10/10 covered
13.6% 9/10 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
58.5% 9/10 covered
82.6% 7/10 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
+0.36 7/10 covered
-0.14 4/10 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
-0.76 7/10 covered
+0.46 4/10 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
0.084 7/10 covered
0.101 4/10 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
15.0 10/10 covered
17.1 9/10 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
1.37 5/8 covered
1.32 4/8 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
1.93 5/8 covered
0.98 4/8 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
1.63 8/8 league matches
2.50 8/8 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
+6.89 5/5 Form window
+0.75 5/5 Form window

KVC Westerlo · Statistics before 24 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · W · W · W · D

Union St. Gilloise · Statistics before 25 Oct 2026 · Recent results D · D · W · W · W

League season

KVC Westerlo
Union St. Gilloise
ConversionGoals / shots · %
16.8% 8/8 covered
16.3% 8/8 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
55.0% 7/8 covered
81.0% 7/8 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
+0.63 5/8 covered
+0.93 4/8 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
-1.07 5/8 covered
+0.48 4/8 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
0.098 5/8 covered
0.091 4/8 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
14.9 8/8 covered
16.9 8/8 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
1.37 5/8 covered
1.32 4/8 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
1.93 5/8 covered
0.98 4/8 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
1.63 8/8 league matches
2.50 8/8 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
+6.89 5/5 Form window
+0.75 5/5 Form window

KVC Westerlo · Statistics before 24 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · W · W · W · D

Union St. Gilloise · Statistics before 25 Oct 2026 · Recent results D · D · W · W · W

Positive Goals − xG means more goals scored than the observed chances predicted. Positive xGA − GA means fewer goals conceded than those chances predicted; it reflects defence and goalkeeping together. Gaps are per covered match and pair goals and xG on the same matches. Shot Quality pairs total xG and total shots. Minimum three known matches per metric; missing data stays unavailable.

Butterfly bars grow from the centre towards each club. Length shows magnitude, not superiority; negative gaps use stripes and a minus sign. Percentages use 0–100%, PPG uses 0–3; other rows share the larger absolute value as their limit. xG, xGA and PPG retain their league-season window. Points vs expected retains the latest up to five completed matches with stored pure forecasts across tracked competitions; results are newest first. These observed metrics are not adjusted for league or opponent strength.

About this comparison

Strength ratings share LOAD90’s fixed scales across leagues. Elo reflects opponent quality; Attack and Defence describe performance against the same reference club on a neutral pitch. Form adjusts for opponents and venue. League Strength is not added a second time. Cross-league ratings remain model estimates; sparse connections between leagues and incomplete data limit precision. Explore the methodology →