Clubs Compare

Lask Linz vs Sporting CP

Real strength. Different football profiles.

Lask Linz

UEFA Champions League · 2026-2027

Rating as of 20 Oct 2026
Power39.4

Sporting CP

Primeira Liga · 2026-2027

Rating as of 20 Oct 2026
Power83.5
The football profile

Club DNA

Lask LinzSporting CP

Strength Profile · Current

Fixed 0–100 ratings. Power is the Elo baseline; Attack and Defence use a common reference opponent. Form is opponent-adjusted.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability Lask Linz · Power 39.4 ptsLask Linz · Attack 48.1 ptsLask Linz · Defence 34.0 ptsLask Linz · Squad Availability 84.0 % Sporting CP · Power 83.5 ptsSporting CP · Attack 75.3 ptsSporting CP · Defence 80.9 ptsSporting CP · Form 83.4 ptsSporting CP · Consistency 64.1 ptsSporting CP · Squad Availability 91.2 % Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability Lask Linz · Power 39.4 ptsLask Linz · Attack 48.1 ptsLask Linz · Defence 34.0 ptsLask Linz · Squad Availability 84.0 % Sporting CP · Power 83.5 ptsSporting CP · Attack 75.3 ptsSporting CP · Defence 80.9 ptsSporting CP · Form 83.4 ptsSporting CP · Consistency 64.1 ptsSporting CP · Squad Availability 91.2 %
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

39.4Power83.5
Sporting CP +44.1 pts
48.1Attack75.3
Sporting CP +27.2 pts
34.0Defence80.9
Sporting CP +46.9 pts
—Form83.4
Shared data unavailable
—Consistency64.1
Shared data unavailable
84.0%Squad Availability91.2%
Sporting CP +7.2 pp

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

  • Sporting CP holds the defensive advantage.
  • Sporting CP has the higher Power rating.
  • Sporting CP has the stronger attacking profile.
  • Sporting CP had more of its weighted squad available for its last completed match.
Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

Lask Linz · Form 2/5 · Consistency 2/2 covered matches · 1 pre-match / 1 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 14 Oct 2026

Sporting CP · Form 5/5 · Consistency 20/20 covered matches · 1 pre-match / 19 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 13 Oct 2026

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

Lask Linz · Current gap SD 0.06 points · mean gap -0.98 · Insufficient sample

Sporting CP · Current gap SD 1.08 points · mean gap 0.10 · Full window

Playing Style · Current

Observed profile · last 10 matches before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 Lask Linz · Possession 42.7 %Lask Linz · Pass accuracy 79.4 %Lask Linz · Shots in the box 63.0 %Lask Linz · On target share 32.2 %Lask Linz · Shot Frequency 4.4 shots/100 passesLask Linz · Corner Pressure 4.0 corners/90 Sporting CP · Possession 55.4 %Sporting CP · Pass accuracy 87.8 %Sporting CP · Shots in the box 66.1 %Sporting CP · On target share 45.4 %Sporting CP · Shot Frequency 2.3 shots/100 passesSporting CP · Corner Pressure 4.1 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 Lask Linz · Possession 42.7 %Lask Linz · Pass accuracy 79.4 %Lask Linz · Shots in the box 63.0 %Lask Linz · On target share 32.2 %Lask Linz · Shot Frequency 4.4 shots/100 passesLask Linz · Corner Pressure 4.0 corners/90 Sporting CP · Possession 55.4 %Sporting CP · Pass accuracy 87.8 %Sporting CP · Shots in the box 66.1 %Sporting CP · On target share 45.4 %Sporting CP · Shot Frequency 2.3 shots/100 passesSporting CP · Corner Pressure 4.1 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

42.7%Possession55.4%
Sporting CP +12.7 pp
79.4%Pass accuracy87.8%
Sporting CP +8.4 pp
63.0%Shots in the box66.1%
Sporting CP +3.1 pp
32.2%On target share45.4%
Sporting CP +13.2 pp
4.4Shot Frequency2.3
Lask Linz +2.2 shots/100 passes
4.0Corner Pressure4.1
Sporting CP +0.1 corners/90

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

Lask Linz · Window 10 matches · before 21 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 9/10 · Corner Pressure 9/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Sporting CP · Window 10 matches · before 25 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 10/10 · Corner Pressure 10/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Strength Profile · Season Average

Match-sampled averages of available ratings this season, across tracked competitions. These are not time-weighted averages or a measure of consistency.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability Sporting CP · Power 81.7 ptsSporting CP · Form 76.1 ptsSporting CP · Consistency 68.8 pts Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability Sporting CP · Power 81.7 ptsSporting CP · Form 76.1 ptsSporting CP · Consistency 68.8 pts
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

—Power81.7
Shared data unavailable
—Attack—
Shared data unavailable
—Defence—
Shared data unavailable
—Form76.1
Shared data unavailable
—Consistency68.8
Shared data unavailable
—Squad Availability—
Shared data unavailable

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

There is not enough shared rating data to explain an advantage yet.

Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

Lask Linz · Power 2 · Attack 1 · Defence 1 · Form 0 · Consistency 0 · Squad Availability 1 · 1 pre-match / 1 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

Sporting CP · Power 10 · Attack 1 · Defence 1 · Form 7 · Consistency 10 · Squad Availability 1 · 1 pre-match / 9 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

Lask Linz · Current gap SD 0.06 points · mean gap -0.98 · Insufficient sample

Sporting CP · Current gap SD 1.08 points · mean gap 0.10 · Full window

Playing Style · Season Average

Observed profile · league season before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 Sporting CP · Possession 59.0 %Sporting CP · Pass accuracy 88.6 %Sporting CP · Shots in the box 67.2 %Sporting CP · On target share 44.0 %Sporting CP · Shot Frequency 2.3 shots/100 passesSporting CP · Corner Pressure 4.6 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 Sporting CP · Possession 59.0 %Sporting CP · Pass accuracy 88.6 %Sporting CP · Shots in the box 67.2 %Sporting CP · On target share 44.0 %Sporting CP · Shot Frequency 2.3 shots/100 passesSporting CP · Corner Pressure 4.6 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

—Possession59.0%
Shared data unavailable
—Pass accuracy88.6%
Shared data unavailable
—Shots in the box67.2%
Shared data unavailable
—On target share44.0%
Shared data unavailable
—Shot Frequency2.3
Shared data unavailable
—Corner Pressure4.6
Shared data unavailable

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

Lask Linz · Window 2 matches · before 21 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 2/2 · Corner Pressure 2/2 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Sporting CP · Window 8 matches · before 25 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 8/8 · Corner Pressure 8/8 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

The season so far

Historical Trend

Power · 0–100

Base Power at recorded match dates. Solid lines join saved pre-match ratings; dashed segments include historical Elo backfills. The same fixed scale is used for both clubs.

Season Power historyAvailable pre-match Power observations and historical Elo backfills. Lines connect observations, not daily measurements. Exact dates and values are available in the table below. 0255075100 Lask Linz · 2026-09-08 16:45:00 UTC · 41.7 · backfill Lask Linz · 2026-10-14 16:45:00 UTC · 40.8 · pre Sporting CP · 2026-08-08 19:30:00 UTC · 81.7 · backfill Sporting CP · 2026-08-14 19:15:00 UTC · 80.9 · backfill Sporting CP · 2026-08-22 19:30:00 UTC · 81.1 · backfill Sporting CP · 2026-08-28 19:15:00 UTC · 81.3 · backfill Sporting CP · 2026-09-05 19:30:00 UTC · 81.9 · backfill Sporting CP · 2026-09-09 19:00:00 UTC · 82 · backfill Sporting CP · 2026-09-13 19:30:00 UTC · 82.6 · backfill Sporting CP · 2026-09-19 19:30:00 UTC · 82.1 · backfill Sporting CP · 2026-10-09 19:15:00 UTC · 81.3 · backfill Sporting CP · 2026-10-13 16:45:00 UTC · 82.4 · pre 8 Aug 202614 Oct 2026
Lask LinzSporting CP
View history data and coverage
ClubDate (UTC)PowerSource
Lask Linz2026-09-08 16:45:0041.7Historical Elo backfill
Lask Linz2026-10-14 16:45:0040.8Saved pre-match
Sporting CP2026-08-08 19:30:0081.7Historical Elo backfill
Sporting CP2026-08-14 19:15:0080.9Historical Elo backfill
Sporting CP2026-08-22 19:30:0081.1Historical Elo backfill
Sporting CP2026-08-28 19:15:0081.3Historical Elo backfill
Sporting CP2026-09-05 19:30:0081.9Historical Elo backfill
Sporting CP2026-09-09 19:00:0082.0Historical Elo backfill
Sporting CP2026-09-13 19:30:0082.6Historical Elo backfill
Sporting CP2026-09-19 19:30:0082.1Historical Elo backfill
Sporting CP2026-10-09 19:15:0081.3Historical Elo backfill
Sporting CP2026-10-13 16:45:0082.4Saved pre-match
Chances, finishing & results

Efficiency

From chances to results. Exact values share a scale within each row; colours identify the clubs.

Last 10

Lask Linz
Sporting CP
ConversionGoals / shots · %
13.7% 9/10 covered
21.0% 10/10 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
46.4% 7/10 covered
80.6% 9/10 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
+0.53 8/10 covered
+1.14 7/10 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
-0.17 8/10 covered
+0.04 7/10 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
0.124 8/10 covered
0.156 7/10 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
14.6 9/10 covered
11.9 10/10 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
— 2/2 covered
1.70 5/8 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
— 2/2 covered
0.85 5/8 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
— 2/2 league matches
2.25 8/8 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
— 2/5 Form window
+1.83 5/5 Form window

Lask Linz · Statistics before 21 Oct 2026 · Recent results L · L

Sporting CP · Statistics before 25 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · W · D · D · W

League season

Lask Linz
Sporting CP
ConversionGoals / shots · %
— 2/2 covered
20.0% 8/8 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
— 2/2 covered
72.7% 7/8 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
— 2/2 covered
+1.30 5/8 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
— 2/2 covered
-0.35 5/8 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
— 2/2 covered
0.147 5/8 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
— 2/2 covered
12.5 8/8 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
— 2/2 covered
1.70 5/8 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
— 2/2 covered
0.85 5/8 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
— 2/2 league matches
2.25 8/8 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
— 2/5 Form window
+1.83 5/5 Form window

Lask Linz · Statistics before 21 Oct 2026 · Recent results L · L

Sporting CP · Statistics before 25 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · W · D · D · W

Positive Goals − xG means more goals scored than the observed chances predicted. Positive xGA − GA means fewer goals conceded than those chances predicted; it reflects defence and goalkeeping together. Gaps are per covered match and pair goals and xG on the same matches. Shot Quality pairs total xG and total shots. Minimum three known matches per metric; missing data stays unavailable.

Butterfly bars grow from the centre towards each club. Length shows magnitude, not superiority; negative gaps use stripes and a minus sign. Percentages use 0–100%, PPG uses 0–3; other rows share the larger absolute value as their limit. xG, xGA and PPG retain their league-season window. Points vs expected retains the latest up to five completed matches with stored pure forecasts across tracked competitions; results are newest first. These observed metrics are not adjusted for league or opponent strength.

About this comparison

Strength ratings share LOAD90’s fixed scales across leagues. Elo reflects opponent quality; Attack and Defence describe performance against the same reference club on a neutral pitch. Form adjusts for opponents and venue. League Strength is not added a second time. Cross-league ratings remain model estimates; sparse connections between leagues and incomplete data limit precision. Explore the methodology →