Clubs Compare

Sabah FA vs Viking

Real strength. Different football profiles.

Sabah FA

UEFA Champions League · 2026-2027

Rating as of 20 Oct 2026
Power26.3

Viking

UEFA Champions League · 2026-2027

Rating as of 20 Oct 2026
Power15.7
The football profile

Club DNA

Sabah FAViking

Strength Profile · Current

Fixed 0–100 ratings. Power is the Elo baseline; Attack and Defence use a common reference opponent. Form is opponent-adjusted.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability Sabah FA · Power 26.3 ptsSabah FA · Attack 30.1 ptsSabah FA · Defence 26.8 pts Viking · Power 15.7 ptsViking · Attack 18.2 ptsViking · Defence 22.7 ptsViking · Squad Availability 99.3 % Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability Sabah FA · Power 26.3 ptsSabah FA · Attack 30.1 ptsSabah FA · Defence 26.8 pts Viking · Power 15.7 ptsViking · Attack 18.2 ptsViking · Defence 22.7 ptsViking · Squad Availability 99.3 %
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

26.3Power15.7
Sabah FA +10.6 pts
30.1Attack18.2
Sabah FA +11.9 pts
26.8Defence22.7
Sabah FA +4.1 pts
—Form—
Shared data unavailable
—Consistency—
Shared data unavailable
—Squad Availability99.3%
Shared data unavailable

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

  • Sabah FA has the stronger attacking profile.
  • Sabah FA has the higher Power rating.
  • Sabah FA holds the defensive advantage.
Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

Sabah FA · Form 2/5 · Consistency 2/2 covered matches · 0 pre-match / 2 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 13 Oct 2026

Viking · Form 2/5 · Consistency 2/2 covered matches · 1 pre-match / 1 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 13 Oct 2026

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

Sabah FA · Current gap SD 0.99 points · mean gap 0.68 · Insufficient sample

Viking · Current gap SD 0.61 points · mean gap 0.28 · Insufficient sample

Playing Style · Current

Observed profile · last 10 matches before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 Sabah FA · Possession 47.7 %Sabah FA · Pass accuracy 82.5 %Sabah FA · Shots in the box 64.5 %Sabah FA · On target share 35.8 %Sabah FA · Shot Frequency 3.9 shots/100 passesSabah FA · Corner Pressure 3.8 corners/90 Viking · Possession 43.5 %Viking · Pass accuracy 74.9 %Viking · Shots in the box 70.2 %Viking · On target share 40.6 %Viking · Shot Frequency 3.0 shots/100 passesViking · Corner Pressure 4.7 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 Sabah FA · Possession 47.7 %Sabah FA · Pass accuracy 82.5 %Sabah FA · Shots in the box 64.5 %Sabah FA · On target share 35.8 %Sabah FA · Shot Frequency 3.9 shots/100 passesSabah FA · Corner Pressure 3.8 corners/90 Viking · Possession 43.5 %Viking · Pass accuracy 74.9 %Viking · Shots in the box 70.2 %Viking · On target share 40.6 %Viking · Shot Frequency 3.0 shots/100 passesViking · Corner Pressure 4.7 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

47.7%Possession43.5%
Sabah FA +4.2 pp
82.5%Pass accuracy74.9%
Sabah FA +7.6 pp
64.5%Shots in the box70.2%
Viking +5.7 pp
35.8%On target share40.6%
Viking +4.8 pp
3.9Shot Frequency3.0
Sabah FA +1.0 shots/100 passes
3.8Corner Pressure4.7
Viking +0.8 corners/90

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

Sabah FA · Window 10 matches · before 20 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 5/10 · Corner Pressure 6/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Viking · Window 6 matches · before 21 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 6/6 · Corner Pressure 6/6 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Strength Profile · Season Average

Match-sampled averages of available ratings this season, across tracked competitions. These are not time-weighted averages or a measure of consistency.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

—Power—
Shared data unavailable
—Attack—
Shared data unavailable
—Defence—
Shared data unavailable
—Form—
Shared data unavailable
—Consistency—
Shared data unavailable
—Squad Availability—
Shared data unavailable

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

There is not enough shared rating data to explain an advantage yet.

Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

Sabah FA · Power 2 · Attack 0 · Defence 0 · Form 0 · Consistency 0 · Squad Availability 0 · 0 pre-match / 2 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

Viking · Power 2 · Attack 1 · Defence 1 · Form 0 · Consistency 0 · Squad Availability 1 · 1 pre-match / 1 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

Sabah FA · Current gap SD 0.99 points · mean gap 0.68 · Insufficient sample

Viking · Current gap SD 0.61 points · mean gap 0.28 · Insufficient sample

Playing Style · Season Average

Observed profile · league season before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

—Possession—
Shared data unavailable
—Pass accuracy—
Shared data unavailable
—Shots in the box—
Shared data unavailable
—On target share—
Shared data unavailable
—Shot Frequency—
Shared data unavailable
—Corner Pressure—
Shared data unavailable

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

Sabah FA · Window 2 matches · before 20 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 2/2 · Corner Pressure 2/2 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Viking · Window 2 matches · before 21 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 2/2 · Corner Pressure 2/2 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

The season so far

Historical Trend

Power · 0–100

Base Power at recorded match dates. Solid lines join saved pre-match ratings; dashed segments include historical Elo backfills. The same fixed scale is used for both clubs.

Season Power historyAvailable pre-match Power observations and historical Elo backfills. Lines connect observations, not daily measurements. Exact dates and values are available in the table below. 0255075100 Sabah FA · 2026-09-10 19:00:00 UTC · 24.6 · backfill Sabah FA · 2026-10-13 16:45:00 UTC · 24.4 · backfill Viking · 2026-09-09 16:45:00 UTC · 15.1 · backfill Viking · 2026-10-13 19:00:00 UTC · 14.9 · pre 9 Sep 202613 Oct 2026
Sabah FAViking
View history data and coverage
ClubDate (UTC)PowerSource
Sabah FA2026-09-10 19:00:0024.6Historical Elo backfill
Sabah FA2026-10-13 16:45:0024.4Historical Elo backfill
Viking2026-09-09 16:45:0015.1Historical Elo backfill
Viking2026-10-13 19:00:0014.9Saved pre-match
Chances, finishing & results

Efficiency

From chances to results. Exact values share a scale within each row; colours identify the clubs.

Last 10

Sabah FA
Viking
ConversionGoals / shots · %
11.5% 6/10 covered
17.2% 6/6 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
63.6% 5/10 covered
68.4% 4/6 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
— 1/10 covered
— 1/6 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
— 1/10 covered
— 1/6 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
— 1/10 covered
— 1/6 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
14.5 6/10 covered
10.7 6/6 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
— 1/2 covered
— 1/2 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
— 1/2 covered
— 1/2 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
— 2/2 league matches
— 2/2 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
— 2/5 Form window
— 2/5 Form window

Sabah FA · Statistics before 20 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · L

Viking · Statistics before 21 Oct 2026 · Recent results D · L

League season

Sabah FA
Viking
ConversionGoals / shots · %
— 2/2 covered
— 2/2 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
— 2/2 covered
— 1/2 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
— 1/2 covered
— 1/2 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
— 1/2 covered
— 1/2 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
— 1/2 covered
— 1/2 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
— 2/2 covered
— 2/2 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
— 1/2 covered
— 1/2 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
— 1/2 covered
— 1/2 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
— 2/2 league matches
— 2/2 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
— 2/5 Form window
— 2/5 Form window

Sabah FA · Statistics before 20 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · L

Viking · Statistics before 21 Oct 2026 · Recent results D · L

Positive Goals − xG means more goals scored than the observed chances predicted. Positive xGA − GA means fewer goals conceded than those chances predicted; it reflects defence and goalkeeping together. Gaps are per covered match and pair goals and xG on the same matches. Shot Quality pairs total xG and total shots. Minimum three known matches per metric; missing data stays unavailable.

Butterfly bars grow from the centre towards each club. Length shows magnitude, not superiority; negative gaps use stripes and a minus sign. Percentages use 0–100%, PPG uses 0–3; other rows share the larger absolute value as their limit. xG, xGA and PPG retain their league-season window. Points vs expected retains the latest up to five completed matches with stored pure forecasts across tracked competitions; results are newest first. These observed metrics are not adjusted for league or opponent strength.

About this comparison

Strength ratings share LOAD90’s fixed scales across leagues. Elo reflects opponent quality; Attack and Defence describe performance against the same reference club on a neutral pitch. Form adjusts for opponents and venue. League Strength is not added a second time. Cross-league ratings remain model estimates; sparse connections between leagues and incomplete data limit precision. Explore the methodology →