Clubs Compare

Eintracht Frankfurt vs SV Elversberg

Real strength. Different football profiles.

SV Elversberg

Bundesliga · 2026-2027

Rating as of 20 Oct 2026
Power41.5
The football profile

Club DNA

Eintracht FrankfurtSV Elversberg

Strength Profile · Current

Fixed 0–100 ratings. Power is the Elo baseline; Attack and Defence use a common reference opponent. Form is opponent-adjusted.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability Eintracht Frankfurt · Power 48.4 ptsEintracht Frankfurt · Attack 54.3 ptsEintracht Frankfurt · Defence 37.3 ptsEintracht Frankfurt · Form 52.2 ptsEintracht Frankfurt · Consistency 63.8 ptsEintracht Frankfurt · Squad Availability 94.6 % SV Elversberg · Power 41.5 ptsSV Elversberg · Attack 44.1 ptsSV Elversberg · Defence 36.9 ptsSV Elversberg · Form 59.9 ptsSV Elversberg · Squad Availability 90.7 % Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability Eintracht Frankfurt · Power 48.4 ptsEintracht Frankfurt · Attack 54.3 ptsEintracht Frankfurt · Defence 37.3 ptsEintracht Frankfurt · Form 52.2 ptsEintracht Frankfurt · Consistency 63.8 ptsEintracht Frankfurt · Squad Availability 94.6 % SV Elversberg · Power 41.5 ptsSV Elversberg · Attack 44.1 ptsSV Elversberg · Defence 36.9 ptsSV Elversberg · Form 59.9 ptsSV Elversberg · Squad Availability 90.7 %
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

48.4Power41.5
Eintracht Frankfurt +6.9 pts
54.3Attack44.1
Eintracht Frankfurt +10.2 pts
37.3Defence36.9
Eintracht Frankfurt +0.4 pts
52.2Form59.9
SV Elversberg +7.7 pts
63.8Consistency—
Shared data unavailable
94.6%Squad Availability90.7%
Eintracht Frankfurt +3.9 pp

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

  • Eintracht Frankfurt has the stronger attacking profile.
  • SV Elversberg shows better recent form.
  • Eintracht Frankfurt has the higher Power rating.
  • Eintracht Frankfurt had more of its weighted squad available for its last completed match.
Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

Eintracht Frankfurt · Form 5/5 · Consistency 20/20 covered matches · 2 pre-match / 18 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 16 Oct 2026

SV Elversberg · Form 5/5 · Consistency 6/6 covered matches · 2 pre-match / 4 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 17 Oct 2026

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

Eintracht Frankfurt · Current gap SD 1.09 points · mean gap -0.09 · Full window

SV Elversberg · Current gap SD 1.29 points · mean gap 0.61 · Insufficient sample

Playing Style · Current

Observed profile · last 10 matches before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 Eintracht Frankfurt · Possession 53.2 %Eintracht Frankfurt · Pass accuracy 82.4 %Eintracht Frankfurt · Shots in the box 67.7 %Eintracht Frankfurt · On target share 41.1 %Eintracht Frankfurt · Shot Frequency 3.1 shots/100 passesEintracht Frankfurt · Corner Pressure 5.6 corners/90 SV Elversberg · Possession 48.0 %SV Elversberg · Pass accuracy 80.0 %SV Elversberg · Shots in the box 65.5 %SV Elversberg · On target share 37.5 %SV Elversberg · Shot Frequency 2.9 shots/100 passesSV Elversberg · Corner Pressure 4.0 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 Eintracht Frankfurt · Possession 53.2 %Eintracht Frankfurt · Pass accuracy 82.4 %Eintracht Frankfurt · Shots in the box 67.7 %Eintracht Frankfurt · On target share 41.1 %Eintracht Frankfurt · Shot Frequency 3.1 shots/100 passesEintracht Frankfurt · Corner Pressure 5.6 corners/90 SV Elversberg · Possession 48.0 %SV Elversberg · Pass accuracy 80.0 %SV Elversberg · Shots in the box 65.5 %SV Elversberg · On target share 37.5 %SV Elversberg · Shot Frequency 2.9 shots/100 passesSV Elversberg · Corner Pressure 4.0 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

53.2%Possession48.0%
Eintracht Frankfurt +5.2 pp
82.4%Pass accuracy80.0%
Eintracht Frankfurt +2.4 pp
67.7%Shots in the box65.5%
Eintracht Frankfurt +2.1 pp
41.1%On target share37.5%
Eintracht Frankfurt +3.6 pp
3.1Shot Frequency2.9
Eintracht Frankfurt +0.2 shots/100 passes
5.6Corner Pressure4.0
Eintracht Frankfurt +1.6 corners/90

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

Eintracht Frankfurt · Window 10 matches · before 24 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 10/10 · Corner Pressure 10/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

SV Elversberg · Window 10 matches · before 24 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 10/10 · Corner Pressure 10/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Strength Profile · Season Average

Match-sampled averages of available ratings this season, across tracked competitions. These are not time-weighted averages or a measure of consistency.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability Eintracht Frankfurt · Power 48.7 ptsEintracht Frankfurt · Form 45.6 ptsEintracht Frankfurt · Consistency 66.2 pts SV Elversberg · Power 39.7 ptsSV Elversberg · Form 71.2 pts Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability Eintracht Frankfurt · Power 48.7 ptsEintracht Frankfurt · Form 45.6 ptsEintracht Frankfurt · Consistency 66.2 pts SV Elversberg · Power 39.7 ptsSV Elversberg · Form 71.2 pts
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

48.7Power39.7
Eintracht Frankfurt +9.0 pts
—Attack—
Shared data unavailable
—Defence—
Shared data unavailable
45.6Form71.2
SV Elversberg +25.6 pts
66.2Consistency—
Shared data unavailable
—Squad Availability—
Shared data unavailable

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

  • SV Elversberg has the higher average Form value.
  • Eintracht Frankfurt has the higher average Power value.
Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

Eintracht Frankfurt · Power 6 · Attack 2 · Defence 2 · Form 3 · Consistency 6 · Squad Availability 2 · 2 pre-match / 4 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

SV Elversberg · Power 6 · Attack 2 · Defence 2 · Form 3 · Consistency 0 · Squad Availability 2 · 2 pre-match / 4 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

Eintracht Frankfurt · Current gap SD 1.09 points · mean gap -0.09 · Full window

SV Elversberg · Current gap SD 1.29 points · mean gap 0.61 · Insufficient sample

Playing Style · Season Average

Observed profile · league season before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 Eintracht Frankfurt · Possession 51.3 %Eintracht Frankfurt · Pass accuracy 81.0 %Eintracht Frankfurt · Shots in the box 78.3 %Eintracht Frankfurt · On target share 39.8 %Eintracht Frankfurt · Shot Frequency 3.4 shots/100 passesEintracht Frankfurt · Corner Pressure 5.3 corners/90 SV Elversberg · Possession 44.3 %SV Elversberg · Pass accuracy 79.5 %SV Elversberg · Shots in the box 72.2 %SV Elversberg · On target share 41.8 %SV Elversberg · Shot Frequency 2.9 shots/100 passesSV Elversberg · Corner Pressure 3.7 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 Eintracht Frankfurt · Possession 51.3 %Eintracht Frankfurt · Pass accuracy 81.0 %Eintracht Frankfurt · Shots in the box 78.3 %Eintracht Frankfurt · On target share 39.8 %Eintracht Frankfurt · Shot Frequency 3.4 shots/100 passesEintracht Frankfurt · Corner Pressure 5.3 corners/90 SV Elversberg · Possession 44.3 %SV Elversberg · Pass accuracy 79.5 %SV Elversberg · Shots in the box 72.2 %SV Elversberg · On target share 41.8 %SV Elversberg · Shot Frequency 2.9 shots/100 passesSV Elversberg · Corner Pressure 3.7 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

51.3%Possession44.3%
Eintracht Frankfurt +7.0 pp
81.0%Pass accuracy79.5%
Eintracht Frankfurt +1.5 pp
78.3%Shots in the box72.2%
Eintracht Frankfurt +6.1 pp
39.8%On target share41.8%
SV Elversberg +2.0 pp
3.4Shot Frequency2.9
Eintracht Frankfurt +0.4 shots/100 passes
5.3Corner Pressure3.7
Eintracht Frankfurt +1.7 corners/90

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

Eintracht Frankfurt · Window 6 matches · before 24 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 6/6 · Corner Pressure 6/6 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

SV Elversberg · Window 6 matches · before 24 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 6/6 · Corner Pressure 6/6 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

The season so far

Historical Trend

Power · 0–100

Base Power at recorded match dates. Solid lines join saved pre-match ratings; dashed segments include historical Elo backfills. The same fixed scale is used for both clubs.

Season Power historyAvailable pre-match Power observations and historical Elo backfills. Lines connect observations, not daily measurements. Exact dates and values are available in the table below. 0255075100 Eintracht Frankfurt · 2026-08-29 13:30:00 UTC · 49.7 · backfill Eintracht Frankfurt · 2026-09-06 15:30:00 UTC · 49.9 · backfill Eintracht Frankfurt · 2026-09-12 13:30:00 UTC · 46.1 · backfill Eintracht Frankfurt · 2026-09-19 13:30:00 UTC · 49.5 · backfill Eintracht Frankfurt · 2026-10-10 16:30:00 UTC · 49.5 · pre Eintracht Frankfurt · 2026-10-16 18:30:00 UTC · 47.5 · pre SV Elversberg · 2026-08-29 13:30:00 UTC · 36.5 · backfill SV Elversberg · 2026-09-05 13:30:00 UTC · 38.7 · backfill SV Elversberg · 2026-09-13 15:30:00 UTC · 41 · backfill SV Elversberg · 2026-09-20 15:30:00 UTC · 40.6 · backfill SV Elversberg · 2026-10-10 13:30:00 UTC · 41.3 · pre SV Elversberg · 2026-10-17 13:30:00 UTC · 40 · pre 29 Aug 202617 Oct 2026
Eintracht FrankfurtSV Elversberg
View history data and coverage
ClubDate (UTC)PowerSource
Eintracht Frankfurt2026-08-29 13:30:0049.7Historical Elo backfill
Eintracht Frankfurt2026-09-06 15:30:0049.9Historical Elo backfill
Eintracht Frankfurt2026-09-12 13:30:0046.1Historical Elo backfill
Eintracht Frankfurt2026-09-19 13:30:0049.5Historical Elo backfill
Eintracht Frankfurt2026-10-10 16:30:0049.5Saved pre-match
Eintracht Frankfurt2026-10-16 18:30:0047.5Saved pre-match
SV Elversberg2026-08-29 13:30:0036.5Historical Elo backfill
SV Elversberg2026-09-05 13:30:0038.7Historical Elo backfill
SV Elversberg2026-09-13 15:30:0041.0Historical Elo backfill
SV Elversberg2026-09-20 15:30:0040.6Historical Elo backfill
SV Elversberg2026-10-10 13:30:0041.3Saved pre-match
SV Elversberg2026-10-17 13:30:0040.0Saved pre-match
Chances, finishing & results

Efficiency

From chances to results. Exact values share a scale within each row; colours identify the clubs.

Last 10

Eintracht Frankfurt
SV Elversberg
ConversionGoals / shots · %
11.3% 10/10 covered
21.4% 10/10 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
65.6% 10/10 covered
55.8% 8/10 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
+0.01 10/10 covered
+0.94 10/10 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
-0.65 10/10 covered
-0.17 10/10 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
0.113 10/10 covered
0.130 10/10 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
14.1 10/10 covered
11.2 10/10 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
1.77 6/6 covered
1.45 6/6 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
2.00 6/6 covered
2.17 6/6 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
1.33 6/6 league matches
1.67 6/6 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
+0.73 5/5 Form window
+1.56 5/5 Form window

Eintracht Frankfurt · Statistics before 24 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · L · D · W · L

SV Elversberg · Statistics before 24 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · L · D · L · W

League season

Eintracht Frankfurt
SV Elversberg
ConversionGoals / shots · %
11.4% 6/6 covered
17.9% 6/6 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
66.7% 6/6 covered
54.8% 5/6 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
-0.10 6/6 covered
+0.55 6/6 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
-0.67 6/6 covered
+0.34 6/6 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
0.120 6/6 covered
0.130 6/6 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
14.7 6/6 covered
11.2 6/6 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
1.77 6/6 covered
1.45 6/6 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
2.00 6/6 covered
2.17 6/6 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
1.33 6/6 league matches
1.67 6/6 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
+0.73 5/5 Form window
+1.56 5/5 Form window

Eintracht Frankfurt · Statistics before 24 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · L · D · W · L

SV Elversberg · Statistics before 24 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · L · D · L · W

Positive Goals − xG means more goals scored than the observed chances predicted. Positive xGA − GA means fewer goals conceded than those chances predicted; it reflects defence and goalkeeping together. Gaps are per covered match and pair goals and xG on the same matches. Shot Quality pairs total xG and total shots. Minimum three known matches per metric; missing data stays unavailable.

Butterfly bars grow from the centre towards each club. Length shows magnitude, not superiority; negative gaps use stripes and a minus sign. Percentages use 0–100%, PPG uses 0–3; other rows share the larger absolute value as their limit. xG, xGA and PPG retain their league-season window. Points vs expected retains the latest up to five completed matches with stored pure forecasts across tracked competitions; results are newest first. These observed metrics are not adjusted for league or opponent strength.

About this comparison

Strength ratings share LOAD90’s fixed scales across leagues. Elo reflects opponent quality; Attack and Defence describe performance against the same reference club on a neutral pitch. Form adjusts for opponents and venue. League Strength is not added a second time. Cross-league ratings remain model estimates; sparse connections between leagues and incomplete data limit precision. Explore the methodology →