Clubs Compare

Fenerbahce vs Lask Linz

Real strength. Different football profiles.

Fenerbahce

Süper Lig · 2026-2027

Rating as of 20 Oct 2026
Power63.6

Lask Linz

UEFA Champions League · 2026-2027

Rating as of 20 Oct 2026
Power39.4
The football profile

Club DNA

FenerbahceLask Linz

Strength Profile · Current

Fixed 0–100 ratings. Power is the Elo baseline; Attack and Defence use a common reference opponent. Form is opponent-adjusted.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability Fenerbahce · Power 63.6 ptsFenerbahce · Attack 74.6 ptsFenerbahce · Defence 53.2 ptsFenerbahce · Form 64.7 ptsFenerbahce · Consistency 59.0 ptsFenerbahce · Squad Availability 92.2 % Lask Linz · Power 39.4 ptsLask Linz · Attack 48.1 ptsLask Linz · Defence 34.0 ptsLask Linz · Squad Availability 84.0 % Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability Fenerbahce · Power 63.6 ptsFenerbahce · Attack 74.6 ptsFenerbahce · Defence 53.2 ptsFenerbahce · Form 64.7 ptsFenerbahce · Consistency 59.0 ptsFenerbahce · Squad Availability 92.2 % Lask Linz · Power 39.4 ptsLask Linz · Attack 48.1 ptsLask Linz · Defence 34.0 ptsLask Linz · Squad Availability 84.0 %
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

63.6Power39.4
Fenerbahce +24.2 pts
74.6Attack48.1
Fenerbahce +26.5 pts
53.2Defence34.0
Fenerbahce +19.2 pts
64.7Form—
Shared data unavailable
59.0Consistency—
Shared data unavailable
92.2%Squad Availability84.0%
Fenerbahce +8.2 pp

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

  • Fenerbahce has the stronger attacking profile.
  • Fenerbahce has the higher Power rating.
  • Fenerbahce holds the defensive advantage.
  • Fenerbahce had more of its weighted squad available for its last completed match.
Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

Fenerbahce · Form 5/5 · Consistency 20/20 covered matches · 2 pre-match / 18 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 17 Oct 2026

Lask Linz · Form 2/5 · Consistency 2/2 covered matches · 1 pre-match / 1 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 14 Oct 2026

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

Fenerbahce · Current gap SD 1.23 points · mean gap -0.02 · Full window

Lask Linz · Current gap SD 0.06 points · mean gap -0.98 · Insufficient sample

Playing Style · Current

Observed profile · last 10 matches before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 Fenerbahce · Possession 48.9 %Fenerbahce · Pass accuracy 86.1 %Fenerbahce · Shots in the box 68.9 %Fenerbahce · On target share 40.7 %Fenerbahce · Shot Frequency 3.8 shots/100 passesFenerbahce · Corner Pressure 5.2 corners/90 Lask Linz · Possession 42.7 %Lask Linz · Pass accuracy 79.4 %Lask Linz · Shots in the box 63.0 %Lask Linz · On target share 32.2 %Lask Linz · Shot Frequency 4.4 shots/100 passesLask Linz · Corner Pressure 4.0 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 Fenerbahce · Possession 48.9 %Fenerbahce · Pass accuracy 86.1 %Fenerbahce · Shots in the box 68.9 %Fenerbahce · On target share 40.7 %Fenerbahce · Shot Frequency 3.8 shots/100 passesFenerbahce · Corner Pressure 5.2 corners/90 Lask Linz · Possession 42.7 %Lask Linz · Pass accuracy 79.4 %Lask Linz · Shots in the box 63.0 %Lask Linz · On target share 32.2 %Lask Linz · Shot Frequency 4.4 shots/100 passesLask Linz · Corner Pressure 4.0 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

48.9%Possession42.7%
Fenerbahce +6.2 pp
86.1%Pass accuracy79.4%
Fenerbahce +6.7 pp
68.9%Shots in the box63.0%
Fenerbahce +5.9 pp
40.7%On target share32.2%
Fenerbahce +8.5 pp
3.8Shot Frequency4.4
Lask Linz +0.7 shots/100 passes
5.2Corner Pressure4.0
Fenerbahce +1.2 corners/90

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

Fenerbahce · Window 10 matches · before 26 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 9/10 · Corner Pressure 9/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Lask Linz · Window 10 matches · before 21 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 9/10 · Corner Pressure 9/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Strength Profile · Season Average

Match-sampled averages of available ratings this season, across tracked competitions. These are not time-weighted averages or a measure of consistency.

Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency Squad Availability Fenerbahce · Power 63.5 ptsFenerbahce · Form 47.4 ptsFenerbahce · Consistency 54.9 pts Strength profile radarCommon axes run from zero at the centre to 100 at the edge. Exact values appear alongside. A missing metric leaves the shape incomplete. 255075100 Power Attack Defence Form Consistency SquadAvailability Fenerbahce · Power 63.5 ptsFenerbahce · Form 47.4 ptsFenerbahce · Consistency 54.9 pts
Ratings · 0–100 · Availability is a percentage

Strength comparison

Point gaps · Availability in percentage points

63.5Power—
Shared data unavailable
—Attack—
Shared data unavailable
—Defence—
Shared data unavailable
47.4Form—
Shared data unavailable
54.9Consistency—
Shared data unavailable
—Squad Availability—
Shared data unavailable

Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.

What separates them

The Difference

There is not enough shared rating data to explain an advantage yet.

Descriptive rating gaps, not a match forecast. Small gaps are left out; missing ratings are not compared.

Fenerbahce · Power 10 · Attack 2 · Defence 2 · Form 7 · Consistency 10 · Squad Availability 2 · 2 pre-match / 8 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

Lask Linz · Power 2 · Attack 1 · Defence 1 · Form 0 · Consistency 0 · Squad Availability 1 · 1 pre-match / 1 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.

How Consistency works

For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.

Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.

Fenerbahce · Current gap SD 1.23 points · mean gap -0.02 · Full window

Lask Linz · Current gap SD 0.06 points · mean gap -0.98 · Insufficient sample

Playing Style · Season Average

Observed profile · league season before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.

Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Pass accuracy 0–100 % Shots in the box 0–100 % On target share 0–100 % Shot Frequency 0–6 shots/100 passes Corner Pressure 0–12 corners/90 Fenerbahce · Possession 53.3 %Fenerbahce · Pass accuracy 87.3 %Fenerbahce · Shots in the box 70.1 %Fenerbahce · On target share 41.5 %Fenerbahce · Shot Frequency 3.9 shots/100 passesFenerbahce · Corner Pressure 6.3 corners/90 Playing style radarEach axis has its own labelled native range, shared by both clubs and both periods. Grid rings mark quarters of those ranges. Exact values appear alongside; missing data leaves the shape incomplete. Possession 0–100 % Passaccuracy 0–100 % Shots inthe box 0–100 % On targetshare 0–100 % ShotFrequency 0–6 shots/100 passes CornerPressure 0–12 corners/90 Fenerbahce · Possession 53.3 %Fenerbahce · Pass accuracy 87.3 %Fenerbahce · Shots in the box 70.1 %Fenerbahce · On target share 41.5 %Fenerbahce · Shot Frequency 3.9 shots/100 passesFenerbahce · Corner Pressure 6.3 corners/90
Native units · axis ranges shown · larger is not better

How they play

Differences in each metric’s native units

53.3%Possession—
Shared data unavailable
87.3%Pass accuracy—
Shared data unavailable
70.1%Shots in the box—
Shared data unavailable
41.5%On target share—
Shared data unavailable
3.9Shot Frequency—
Shared data unavailable
6.3Corner Pressure—
Shared data unavailable

Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.

These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.

Fenerbahce · Window 8 matches · before 26 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 7/8 · Corner Pressure 7/8 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

Lask Linz · Window 2 matches · before 21 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 2/2 · Corner Pressure 2/2 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.

The season so far

Historical Trend

Power · 0–100

Base Power at recorded match dates. Solid lines join saved pre-match ratings; dashed segments include historical Elo backfills. The same fixed scale is used for both clubs.

Season Power historyAvailable pre-match Power observations and historical Elo backfills. Lines connect observations, not daily measurements. Exact dates and values are available in the table below. 0255075100 Fenerbahce · 2026-08-15 18:30:00 UTC · 64.7 · backfill Fenerbahce · 2026-08-22 18:30:00 UTC · 61.5 · backfill Fenerbahce · 2026-08-30 18:30:00 UTC · 63.9 · backfill Fenerbahce · 2026-09-05 17:00:00 UTC · 65.6 · backfill Fenerbahce · 2026-09-10 16:45:00 UTC · 63.2 · backfill Fenerbahce · 2026-09-14 17:00:00 UTC · 63 · backfill Fenerbahce · 2026-09-20 14:00:00 UTC · 62.2 · backfill Fenerbahce · 2026-10-10 16:00:00 UTC · 62.9 · backfill Fenerbahce · 2026-10-14 19:00:00 UTC · 64.5 · pre Fenerbahce · 2026-10-17 16:00:00 UTC · 63 · pre Lask Linz · 2026-09-08 16:45:00 UTC · 41.7 · backfill Lask Linz · 2026-10-14 16:45:00 UTC · 40.8 · pre 15 Aug 202617 Oct 2026
FenerbahceLask Linz
View history data and coverage
ClubDate (UTC)PowerSource
Fenerbahce2026-08-15 18:30:0064.7Historical Elo backfill
Fenerbahce2026-08-22 18:30:0061.5Historical Elo backfill
Fenerbahce2026-08-30 18:30:0063.9Historical Elo backfill
Fenerbahce2026-09-05 17:00:0065.6Historical Elo backfill
Fenerbahce2026-09-10 16:45:0063.2Historical Elo backfill
Fenerbahce2026-09-14 17:00:0063.0Historical Elo backfill
Fenerbahce2026-09-20 14:00:0062.2Historical Elo backfill
Fenerbahce2026-10-10 16:00:0062.9Historical Elo backfill
Fenerbahce2026-10-14 19:00:0064.5Saved pre-match
Fenerbahce2026-10-17 16:00:0063.0Saved pre-match
Lask Linz2026-09-08 16:45:0041.7Historical Elo backfill
Lask Linz2026-10-14 16:45:0040.8Saved pre-match
Chances, finishing & results

Efficiency

From chances to results. Exact values share a scale within each row; colours identify the clubs.

Last 10

Fenerbahce
Lask Linz
ConversionGoals / shots · %
16.6% 9/10 covered
13.7% 9/10 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
74.0% 8/10 covered
46.4% 7/10 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
+0.76 6/10 covered
+0.53 8/10 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
+0.01 6/10 covered
-0.17 8/10 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
0.142 6/10 covered
0.124 8/10 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
16.1 9/10 covered
14.6 9/10 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
2.72 6/8 covered
— 2/2 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
1.16 6/8 covered
— 2/2 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
2.00 8/8 league matches
— 2/2 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
+0.52 5/5 Form window
— 2/5 Form window

Fenerbahce · Statistics before 26 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · L · W · W · D

Lask Linz · Statistics before 21 Oct 2026 · Recent results L · L

League season

Fenerbahce
Lask Linz
ConversionGoals / shots · %
16.9% 7/8 covered
— 2/2 covered
Save RateSaves / shots on target faced · %
78.8% 6/8 covered
— 2/2 covered
Goals − xGFinishing gap · per match
+0.79 6/8 covered
— 2/2 covered
xGA − GAGoals prevented · per match
+0.50 6/8 covered
— 2/2 covered
Shot QualityObserved xG / shot
0.135 6/8 covered
— 2/2 covered
Shot VolumeShots / 90
18.6 7/8 covered
— 2/2 covered
xG / matchLeague season · fixed window
2.72 6/8 covered
— 2/2 covered
xGA / matchLeague season · fixed window
1.16 6/8 covered
— 2/2 covered
Points / gameLeague season · fixed window
2.00 8/8 league matches
— 2/2 league matches
Points vs expected · Form windowUp to 5 matches · stored pure forecasts
+0.52 5/5 Form window
— 2/5 Form window

Fenerbahce · Statistics before 26 Oct 2026 · Recent results W · L · W · W · D

Lask Linz · Statistics before 21 Oct 2026 · Recent results L · L

Positive Goals − xG means more goals scored than the observed chances predicted. Positive xGA − GA means fewer goals conceded than those chances predicted; it reflects defence and goalkeeping together. Gaps are per covered match and pair goals and xG on the same matches. Shot Quality pairs total xG and total shots. Minimum three known matches per metric; missing data stays unavailable.

Butterfly bars grow from the centre towards each club. Length shows magnitude, not superiority; negative gaps use stripes and a minus sign. Percentages use 0–100%, PPG uses 0–3; other rows share the larger absolute value as their limit. xG, xGA and PPG retain their league-season window. Points vs expected retains the latest up to five completed matches with stored pure forecasts across tracked competitions; results are newest first. These observed metrics are not adjusted for league or opponent strength.

About this comparison

Strength ratings share LOAD90’s fixed scales across leagues. Elo reflects opponent quality; Attack and Defence describe performance against the same reference club on a neutral pitch. Form adjusts for opponents and venue. League Strength is not added a second time. Cross-league ratings remain model estimates; sparse connections between leagues and incomplete data limit precision. Explore the methodology →