GO Ahead Eagles vs PSV Eindhoven
Real strength. Different football profiles.
Club DNA
Strength Profile · Current
Fixed 0–100 ratings. Power is the Elo baseline; Attack and Defence use a common reference opponent. Form is opponent-adjusted.
Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.
The Difference
- PSV Eindhoven has the higher Power rating.
- PSV Eindhoven holds the defensive advantage.
- PSV Eindhoven has the stronger attacking profile.
- GO Ahead Eagles had more of its weighted squad available for its last completed match.
GO Ahead Eagles · Form 5/5 · Consistency 20/20 covered matches · 1 pre-match / 19 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 18 Oct 2026
PSV Eindhoven · Form 5/5 · Consistency 20/20 covered matches · 2 pre-match / 18 historical forecast backfills · Availability · last completed match 17 Oct 2026
How Consistency works
For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.
Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.
GO Ahead Eagles · Current gap SD 0.95 points · mean gap 0.04 · Full window
PSV Eindhoven · Current gap SD 1.30 points · mean gap -0.16 · Full window
Playing Style · Current
Observed profile · last 10 matches before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.
Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.
These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.
GO Ahead Eagles · Window 10 matches · before 23 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 10/10 · Corner Pressure 10/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.
PSV Eindhoven · Window 10 matches · before 25 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 10/10 · Corner Pressure 10/10 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.
Strength Profile · Season Average
Match-sampled averages of available ratings this season, across tracked competitions. These are not time-weighted averages or a measure of consistency.
Consistency measures variation in points minus LOAD90 expected points, centred on the club’s average gap. Higher means less variation, not better results. Squad Availability is the percentage of model-weighted squad available for the last completed match, using its saved pre-match snapshot. It does not predict readiness for the next match. Missing historical data stays unavailable.
The Difference
- PSV Eindhoven has the higher average Power value.
- PSV Eindhoven has the higher average Form value.
- GO Ahead Eagles has the higher average Consistency value.
GO Ahead Eagles · Power 9 · Attack 1 · Defence 1 · Form 6 · Consistency 9 · Squad Availability 1 · 1 pre-match / 8 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.
PSV Eindhoven · Power 11 · Attack 2 · Defence 2 · Form 8 · Consistency 11 · Squad Availability 2 · 2 pre-match / 9 historical Elo backfills. Minimum 3 observations per average. Consistency averages eligible rolling windows, which overlap; availability uses genuine pre-match snapshots only. Historical Form is reconstructed using the current calibration.
How Consistency works
For each match, gap = points earned − LOAD90 expected points. Consistency = 100 × (1 − SD(gaps) / 3), with SD calculated around the window’s mean gap. The endpoints come from the mathematical bounds of point gaps; this is not a fitted percentile or a forecast factor. A constant positive or negative gap can be consistent.
Current uses the latest 20 completed tracked matches within one year. At least 15 usable forecasts and 75% coverage are required. A 15–19-match score is provisional; comparative Consistency insights require 20 each. Historical backfills are reconstructed expectations, not forecasts archived before kickoff. Result randomness and changes in model calibration can affect the score.
GO Ahead Eagles · Current gap SD 0.95 points · mean gap 0.04 · Full window
PSV Eindhoven · Current gap SD 1.30 points · mean gap -0.16 · Full window
Playing Style · Season Average
Observed profile · league season before each club’s reference fixture. Native units and coverage are shown below.
Shot Frequency = shots per 100 passes on the same covered matches: how quickly passing sequences turn into attempts. Corner Pressure = corners per completed 90-minute game. These describe attacking tendencies, not strength; extra time and custom-length games are excluded.
These are observed profiles. League and schedule differences can affect them. The radar uses native axis ranges shared by both clubs and both periods; a larger shape does not imply superiority.
GO Ahead Eagles · Window 9 matches · before 23 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 9/9 · Corner Pressure 9/9 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.
PSV Eindhoven · Window 9 matches · before 25 Oct 2026 · Shot Frequency 9/9 · Corner Pressure 9/9 covered regulation matches. Per-metric coverage of the four percentage shares is unavailable.
Historical Trend
Base Power at recorded match dates. Solid lines join saved pre-match ratings; dashed segments include historical Elo backfills. The same fixed scale is used for both clubs.
View history data and coverage
| Club | Date (UTC) | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| GO Ahead Eagles | 2026-08-08 16:45:00 | 23.9 | Historical Elo backfill |
| GO Ahead Eagles | 2026-08-16 12:30:00 | 24.9 | Historical Elo backfill |
| GO Ahead Eagles | 2026-08-23 10:15:00 | 25.7 | Historical Elo backfill |
| GO Ahead Eagles | 2026-08-29 16:45:00 | 26.5 | Historical Elo backfill |
| GO Ahead Eagles | 2026-09-08 12:00:00 | 25.6 | Historical Elo backfill |
| GO Ahead Eagles | 2026-09-12 16:45:00 | 26.1 | Historical Elo backfill |
| GO Ahead Eagles | 2026-09-20 14:45:00 | 25.8 | Historical Elo backfill |
| GO Ahead Eagles | 2026-10-10 14:30:00 | 26.3 | Historical Elo backfill |
| GO Ahead Eagles | 2026-10-18 10:15:00 | 25.7 | Saved pre-match |
| PSV Eindhoven | 2026-08-08 18:00:00 | 76.3 | Historical Elo backfill |
| PSV Eindhoven | 2026-08-15 18:00:00 | 75.2 | Historical Elo backfill |
| PSV Eindhoven | 2026-08-23 12:30:00 | 75.7 | Historical Elo backfill |
| PSV Eindhoven | 2026-08-30 10:15:00 | 76.1 | Historical Elo backfill |
| PSV Eindhoven | 2026-09-05 18:00:00 | 77.5 | Historical Elo backfill |
| PSV Eindhoven | 2026-09-10 16:45:00 | 78.8 | Historical Elo backfill |
| PSV Eindhoven | 2026-09-13 18:00:00 | 78.0 | Historical Elo backfill |
| PSV Eindhoven | 2026-09-20 12:30:00 | 78.3 | Historical Elo backfill |
| PSV Eindhoven | 2026-10-09 18:00:00 | 76.7 | Historical Elo backfill |
| PSV Eindhoven | 2026-10-13 19:00:00 | 77.0 | Saved pre-match |
| PSV Eindhoven | 2026-10-17 14:30:00 | 75.9 | Saved pre-match |
Efficiency
From chances to results. Exact values share a scale within each row; colours identify the clubs.
Last 10
GO Ahead Eagles · Statistics before 23 Oct 2026 · Recent results L · D · D · D · D
PSV Eindhoven · Statistics before 25 Oct 2026 · Recent results L · L · W · L · W
League season
GO Ahead Eagles · Statistics before 23 Oct 2026 · Recent results L · D · D · D · D
PSV Eindhoven · Statistics before 25 Oct 2026 · Recent results L · L · W · L · W
Positive Goals − xG means more goals scored than the observed chances predicted. Positive xGA − GA means fewer goals conceded than those chances predicted; it reflects defence and goalkeeping together. Gaps are per covered match and pair goals and xG on the same matches. Shot Quality pairs total xG and total shots. Minimum three known matches per metric; missing data stays unavailable.
Butterfly bars grow from the centre towards each club. Length shows magnitude, not superiority; negative gaps use stripes and a minus sign. Percentages use 0–100%, PPG uses 0–3; other rows share the larger absolute value as their limit. xG, xGA and PPG retain their league-season window. Points vs expected retains the latest up to five completed matches with stored pure forecasts across tracked competitions; results are newest first. These observed metrics are not adjusted for league or opponent strength.
GO Ahead Eagles
Next fixtures
- 23 Octvs Telstar
- 31 Octat Cambuur
- 7 Novat Excelsior
- 22 Novvs Fortuna Sittard
- 28 Novat PSV Eindhoven
Key player availability · last completed match
2 absent · 0 key. J. Dirksen, P. Saathof
PSV Eindhoven
Next fixtures
- 20 Octat FC Porto
- 25 Octvs Feyenoord
- 31 Octvs Willem II
- 4 Novvs Club Brugge KV
- 8 Novat Cambuur
Key player availability · last completed match
8 absent · 2 key. P. Wanner, J. Schouten
About this comparison
Strength ratings share LOAD90’s fixed scales across leagues. Elo reflects opponent quality; Attack and Defence describe performance against the same reference club on a neutral pitch. Form adjusts for opponents and venue. League Strength is not added a second time. Cross-league ratings remain model estimates; sparse connections between leagues and incomplete data limit precision. Explore the methodology →